Products from limiting reactant

SAMPLE PROBLEM 9.5 Moles of Product from Limiting Reactant... 

Step 4 Calculate the number of moles of product from each reactant and select the smaller number of moles as the amount of product from the limiting reactant. 

Further, as the current density of the fuel cell increases, a point is inevitably reached where the transport of reactants to or products from the surface of the electrode becomes limited by diffusion. A concentration polarization is estabhshed at the elec trode, which diminishes the cell operating potential. The magnitude of this effect depends on many design and operating variables, and its value must be obtained empirically. 

Under these conditions, the theoretical yield of product is the amount produced if the limiting reactant is completely consumed. In the case just cited, the theoretical yield of Sbl3 is 2.00 mol, the amount formed from the limiting reactant, I2. 

The theoretical yield is the maximum amount of product that can be obtained. In calculating the theoretical yield, it is assumed that the limiting reactant is 100% converted to product. In the real world, that is unlikely to happen. Some of the limiting reactant may be consumed in competing reactions. Some of the product may be lost in separating it from the reaction mixture. For these and other reasons, the experimental yield is ordinarily less than the theoretical yield. Put another way, the percent yield is expected to be less than 100% ... 

Since the free energy of a molecule in the liquid phase is not markedly different from that of the same species volatilized, the variation in the intrinsic reactivity associated with the controlling step in a solid—liquid process is not expected to be very different from that of the solid—gas reaction. Interpretation of kinetic data for solid—liquid reactions must, however, always consider the possibility that mass transfer in the homogeneous phase of reactants to or products from, the reaction interface is rate-limiting [108,109], Kinetic aspects of solid—liquid reactions have been discussed by Taplin [110]. 

The limiting reactant is the reactant that will be completely used up. All other reactants are in excess. Because the limiting reactant is the one that limits the amounts of products that can be formed, the theoretical yield is calculated from the amount of the limiting reactant. 

Intelligent engineering can drastically improve process selectivity (see Sharma, 1988, 1990) as illustrated in Chapter 4 of this book. A combination of reaction with an appropriate separation operation is the first option if the reaction is limited by chemical equilibrium. In such combinations one product is removed from the reaction zone continuously, allowing for a higher conversion of raw materials. Extractive reactions involve the addition of a second liquid phase, in which the product is better soluble than the reactants, to the reaction zone. Thus, the product is withdrawn from the reactive phase shifting the reaction mixture to product(s). The same principle can be realized if an additive is introduced into the reaction zone that causes precipitation of the desired product. A combination of reaction with distillation in a single column allows the removal of volatile products from the reaction zone that is then realized in the (fractional) distillation zone. Finally, reaction can be combined with filtration. A typical example of the latter system is the application of catalytic membranes. In all these cases, withdrawal of the product shifts the equilibrium mixture to the product. 

Figure 5.60 displays a portion of the Diels-Alder reaction profile in the neighborhood of the TS complex. In this case the IRC profile is rather unsymmetric around s = 0, ascending slowly from the reactant side toward the TS summit, then plummeting rapidly toward the product cyclohexene limit, which lies about 29 kcal mol-1 below the reactants (and 54 kcal mol-1 below the TS). 

A second-order reaction may typically involve one reactant (A -> products, ( -rA) = kAc ) or two reactants ( pa A + vb B - products, ( rA) = kAcAcB). For one reactant, the integrated form for constant density, applicable to a BR or a PFR, is contained in equation 3.4-9, with n = 2. In contrast to a first-order reaction, the half-life of a reactant, f1/2 from equation 3.4-16, is proportional to cA (if there are two reactants, both ty2 and fractional conversion refer to the limiting reactant). For two reactants, the integrated form for constant density, applicable to a BR and a PFR, is given by equation 3.4-13 (see Example 3-5). In this case, the reaction stoichiometry must be taken into account in relating concentrations, or in switching rate or rate constant from one reactant to the other. 

The HTE characteristics that apply for gas-phase reactions (i.e., measurement under nondiffusion-limited conditions, equal distribution of gas flows and temperature, avoidance of crosscontamination, etc.) also apply for catalytic reactions in the liquid-phase. In addition, in liquid phase reactions mass-transport phenomena of the reactants are a vital point, especially if one of the reactants is a gas. It is worth spending some time to reflect on the topic of mass transfer related to liquid-gas-phase reactions. As we discussed before, for gas-phase catalysis, a crucial point is the measurement of catalysts under conditions where mass transport is not limiting the reaction and yields true microkinetic data. As an additional factor for mass transport in liquid-gas-phase reactions, the rate of reaction gas saturation of the liquid can also determine the kinetics of the reaction [81], In order to avoid mass-transport limitations with regard to gas/liquid mass transport, the transfer rate of the gas into the liquid (saturation of the liquid with gas) must be higher than the consumption of the reactant gas by the reaction. Otherwise, it is not possible to obtain true kinetic data of the catalytic reaction, which allow a comparison of the different catalyst candidates on a microkinetic basis, as only the gas uptake of the liquid will govern the result of the experiment (see Figure 11.32a). In three-phase reactions (gas-liquid-solid), the transport of the reactants to the surface of the solid (and the transport from the resulting products from this surface) will also... 

In the problem above, the amount of product calculated based upon the limiting reactant concept is the maximum amount of product that will form from the specified amounts of reactants. This maximum amount of product is the theoretical yield. However, rarely is the amount that is actually formed (the actual yield) the same as the theoretical yield. Normally it is less. There are many reasons for this, but the principal one is that most reactions do not go to completion they establish an equilibrium system (see Chapter 14 for a discussion on chemical equilibrium). For whatever reason, not as much product as expected is formed. We can judge the efficiency of the reaction by calculating the percent yield. The percent yield (% yield) is the actual yield divided by the theoretical yield and the resultant multiplied by 100 in order to generate a percentage ... 

In this problem, the actual yield is the amount of product found by the scientist (45.2 g IF5) therefore, we need the theoretical yield to finish the problem. Since our actual yield has the units g IF5, our theoretical yield must have identical units. To determine the grams of IF5 from the moles of limiting reactant, we need the molar mass of IF5 [126.9 g I/mol 1 + 5 (19.00 g F/mol F) = 221.9 g nymol]. 

---