Problems in quantification

Analysis is most frequently done qualitatively since there are problems in quantification (Reed, 1973). Although intensity is approximately proportional to mass concentration of a given element there are significant deviations, depending on which other elements are present. 

Principal air quality issues of local, national, and international concern are listed below in increasing order of difficulty based on the number of different types of pollutants and problems in quantification of the risks the pollutants pose (Cooper et al., 1997) ... 

Neuhoff, V., Stamm, R., Pardowitz, I., Arold, N., Ehrhardt, W., Taube, D. (1990). Essential problems in quantification of proteins following colloidal staining with coomassie brilliant blue dyes in polyacrylamide gels, and their solution. Electrophoresis 11,101-117. 

In EDS the production of extraneous radiation is a problem, especially in TEM. During the irradiation of the specimen, electrons are scattered, and both characteristic and continuum X-rays are produced from materials in the surrounding area, such as the grid, the specimen support, and the lens pole pieces. Such extraneous contributions may cause errors by masking elements present in the specimen and by production of excess continuum, which causes problems in quantification. 

Surface analysis by non-resonant (NR-) laser-SNMS [3.102-3.106] has been used to improve ionization efficiency while retaining the advantages of probing the neutral component. In NR-laser-SNMS, an intense laser beam is used to ionize, non-selec-tively, all atoms and molecules within the volume intersected by the laser beam (Eig. 3.40b). With sufficient laser power density it is possible to saturate the ionization process. Eor NR-laser-SNMS adequate power densities are typically achieved in a small volume only at the focus of the laser beam. This limits sensitivity and leads to problems with quantification, because of the differences between the effective ionization volumes of different elements. The non-resonant post-ionization technique provides rapid, multi-element, and molecular survey measurements with significantly improved ionization efficiency over SIMS, although it still suffers from isoba-ric interferences. 

The applications concern classification as well as quantification problems. In Table 44.3 some examples are given in both problem domains. 

There are special problems in bioequivalency determinations when conventional pharmacokinetic studies are not possible. For example, when drugs are administered intranasally for direct treatment of receptors in the nasal mucosa, the concentration of drug in plasma may be below the limit of quantification. In such cases we are forced to attempt measurement of clinical response. The subjectivity and/or low precision of this type of study can be a serious problem. 

A major problem in the quantification of air-water transport phenomena in terms of the rate expression [Equation (4.18)] is to find appropriate values for Kl. As far as sewer systems are concerned, the most well-established knowledge concerning air-water mass transfer is on reaeration (Section 4.4). 

Continuing with the mini-theme of computational materials chemistry is Chapter 3 by Professor Thomas M. Truskett and coworkers. As in the previous chapters, the authors quickly frame the problem in terms of mapping atomic (chemical) to macroscopic (physical) properties. The authors then focus our attention on condensed media phenomena, specifically those in glasses and liquids. In this chapter, three properties receive attention—structural order, free volume, and entropy. Order, whether it is in a man-made material or found in nature, may be considered by many as something that is easy to spot, but difficult to quantify yet quantifying order is indeed what Professor Truskett and his coauthors describe. Different types of order are presented, as are various metrics used for their quantification, all the while maintaining theoretical rigor but not at the expense of readability. The authors follow this section of their... 

Detector sensitivity is one of the most important properties of the detector. The problem is to distinguish between the actual component and artifact caused by the pressure fluctuation, bubble, compositional fluctuation, etc. If the peaks are fairly large, one has no problem in distinguishing them however, the smaller the peaks, the more important that the baseline be smooth, free of noise and drift. Baseline noise is the short time variation of the baseline from a straight line. Noise is normally measured "peak-to-peak" i.e., the distance from the top of one such small peak to the bottom of the next. Noise is the factor which limits detector sensitivity. In trace analysis, the operator must be able to distinguish between noise spikes and component peaks. For qualitative purposes, signal/noise ratio is limited by 3. For quantitative purposes, signal/noise ratio should be at least 10. This ensures correct quantification of the trace amounts with less than 2% variance. The baseline should deviate as little as possible from a horizontal line. It is usually measured for a specified time, e.g., 1/2 hour or one hour and called drift. Drift usually associated to the detector heat-up in the first hour after power-on. 

In summary, the use of mass spectrometric methods, combined with various approaches to vaporizing and ionizing the particles, is gaining increasing popularity and interest for the analysis of continuous sources of particles or single particles. The problem of quantification of the components seen by single-particle laser ionization techniques remains to be solved. On the other hand, the vaporization approaches can provide quantitative data on some volatile and semivolatile components but cannot measure the nonvolatile species and, at present, do not provide a full mass spectrum for a single particle. 

However, the nucleic acid-based assays for the detection of food pathogens show problems regarding the sensitivity of the polymerase enzyme to environmental contaminants, difficulties in quantification, the generation of false-positives through the detection of naked nucleic acids, non-viable microorganisms or contamination of samples in the laboratory, and may limit the use of PCR for the direct detection of microbial contamination. 

The rivers play a major role in the transfert of carbon and mineral nutrients from land to the sea and influence significantly the biogeochemical processes operating in coastal waters. Quantification of the material transport, both in the dissolved and particulate forms, has been attempted by several authors in the past (Clarke, 1924 Holeman, 1968 Garrels McKenzie, 1971 Martin et al., 1980 Meybeck, 1982 Milliman Meade, 1983). Depending on the type of sampling techniques and methods of calculations employed there are differences in the reported fluxes. A major problem in such calculations is the paucity of reliable data from some of the major rivers of the world especially of Asia (see e.g. Milliman Meade, 1983). Additionally the difficulty of obtaining representative samples from the rivers will adversely affect flux calculations. Most of the inferences drawn on the nature and transport of riverine materials rest on data collected randomly - at different points in time and space. Seasonal variations in the transport of materials are very common in some of the major world rivers, and in some cases more than 60 % of the material transport occurs within a very short period of time. Furthermore, available data are not always comparable since the analytical techniques used differ from river to river. 

The abundance and reactivity of any compound is governed by thermodynamic and kinetic principles. Therefore, analytical data is used in conjunction with thermodynamic and kinetic parameters to model complex systems. Often, the most toxic elemental forms are the most reactive and therefore represent the lowest concentrated chemicals species in water. This leads to additional problems in isolation, identification and quantification when assessing potential pollution problems. 

True quantification of pyrazines in the powdered sarples presented seme difficulty. Due to sensitivity problems in sampling reconstituted sairples, the decision was made to purge the powdered NFCM. An internal standard could not be easily added to a dry sample, so quantification was accomplished calculating concentrations relative to response factors determined for external standard solutions. Standardized concentration units were determined using the following relationships ... 

---