Probability of injury

The probability of injury from any of these conditions is increased by an inability to escape. All the conditions tend to be more likely to lead to... 

Risk The probability of injury, disease, loss of function, or death for an individual or population exposed to a hazardous substance (risk = hazard x exposure) Evaluating the dose of lead or mercury that causes developmental effects in children... 

The drift of pesticides in the forestry environment has the potential for greater environmental impact than in an agricultural environment and results in a greater social concern for their impact on human health. The factors affecting drift transfer of pesticide, especially herbicides, will be examined, the probable deposit and exposure level identified, and the risk of probability of injury to human health calculated. 

In order to understand the potential physical hazard-type risks associated with consumer products, it is important to utilize a multidisciplinary approach. In order to identify the population that is at risk, it is necessary to investigate injury and fatality incidents with similar products. Following this identification, characterization of the physical interaction of a consumer and a product reveals hazard and associated severity levels. Characterization of product attributes allows for the development of strategies that may mitigate product hazard and therefore reduce the probability of injury. 

Relationships for hazard distances as a function of probability of injury are listed in Table... 

Table 2-B Ranges for Probabilities of Injuries from Flying Debris 2-3...

Although seldom recognized or acknowledged, safety and health professionals do have a major impact on the lives of their employees as well as their families and communities. The day-to-day activities performed by the safety and health professional reduce the risks and probabilities of injury and illness which not only impacts the injured employee but also many others in the cascading and intertwined relationships inside and outside of the workplace. Through the constant and creative activities of the safety and health professional, the risks within the operations are minimized or eliminated providing positive benefits not only to company or organization but also to employees within the workplace. 

Figure 5. Degrees of belief for probability of injury given...

Combining the equations in (3.9)-(3.11) with the boundary conditions establishes a system that simultaneously solves for the equilibrium values of the endogenous variables at various probabilities of injury, including zero and the maximum injury probability. Numerical accuracy increases as the interval of differencing decreases (as A -> 0), assuming round-off error is small. In the reported simulations we decreased the interval of differencing imtil all boundary solutions changed by less than 0.1 percent. ... 

We assumed a quadratic safety production function, s = Sq +Sjn + S27i, meaning we had to determine the constant, sq, and the coefficients on risk and its square, and S2- Hence, to calibrate the model completely we needed two additional conditions. Based on data reported in Oi (1973, p. 72) we adopted 0.4 as the proportion of firms without incremental workplace hazards which implies in our model a value of p for the last firm located at tt = 0, denoted M(0). We also assumed 0.003 is the highest probability of injury observed in the labor... 

Equations (A3.11)-(A3.15) define the maximum probability of injury, ti , and the accompanying equilibrium, while equation (A3.16) establishes equilibrium at the zero level of injury risk. Viewed independently the six equations determine the labor market outcomes of... 

To Improve readability, the average frequency of injury and the largest probability of injury have been increased by 10 Table 4-1 lists the functions and parameter values used in the numerical simulations. 

Finally, we can see from Table 4-2 WC reduces only slightly OSHA s effectiveness in eliminating extreme workplace hazards. Fines of 22,329 lower the largest probability of injury by 8.7 percent when WC replaces half of a worker s pre-injury earnings and lower it by 8.5 percent when WC provides 1.5 times the workers pre-injury earnings. In other words OSHA is only slightly more effective in reducing the most severe workplace hazards when WC benefits are low. 

To dig deeper into the labor market influence of the workers compensation insurance system Table 4-4 also illustrates how WC influences the largest probability of injury. Because workers are more... 

The Interface Between WC and OSHA. We can use the results reported in Table 4-4 to examine further the interface between WC and OSHA. The absolute size of the interaction must, of course, be the same as reported earlier when we discussed the labor market effects of OSHA enforcement activities. Still, because WC increases injuries only slightly, the interaction between the two safety programs appear larger when put on a percentage basis. For instance, a movement toward a 0.80 rate of income replacement increases the average frequency of injuries by 0.4 percent in the absence of safety standards, but by 0.6 percent with maximum enforcement of safety standards. Further, the increase in WC benefits raises the maximum probability of injury by 0.2 percent without OSHA but by 0.3 percent with an extremely stringent OSHA program. 

---