Pressure monolithic

SIC was proposed in 2003 as simple, rapid, and inexpensive separation approach (Satmsky et al., 2003 Chocholous et al., 2007 Solich, 2008 Ruzicka, 2014). Due to the low-pressure operation of SIA, direct coupling to conventional packed separation columns is impossible. SIC is actually a development of SIA with a view to achieving direct coupling to a separation column. The development of SIC was the result of the introduction of monolithic stationary phases. In a typical SIC manifold, a low-pressure monolithic separation column is introduced between the multiport selection valve and the detector (Figure 2.7). Monolithic columns consist of a single piece of high-purity... 

The seven processing steps shown schematically in Figure 1 are involved to various degrees in making sol—gel-derived siUca monoliths by methods 1, 2, and 3. The emphasis herein is primarily on net-shape sol—gel-derived siUca monoliths made by the alkoxide process (method 3) prepared under ambient pressures. 

The simplest osmotic dosage form, ALZA Corporation s OROS elementary osmotic pump (Fig. 7), combines the dmg and sometimes an osmotic agent in a monolithic core and deflvers the dmg in solution (102). The mass dehvery rate with time dm df) of the dmg solution is described by equation 4, where is the hydrauHc permeabiUty of the membrane, a is the membrane reflection coefficient, Atz is the osmotic pressure gradient, APis the hydrostatic back pressure, A is the area of the membrane, C is the dissolved concentration of the dmg, and b is the membrane thickness. 

Automobile exhaust catalysts have been developed that maximize the catalyst surface area available to the flowing exhaust gas without incurring excessive pressure drop. Two types have been extensively studied the monolithic honeycomb type and the pellet type. 

Use of the peUetted converter, developed and used by General Motors starting in 1975, has declined since 1980. The advantage of the peUetted converter, which consists of a packed bed of small spherical beads about 3 mm in diameter, is that the pellets were less cosdy to manufacture than the monolithic honeycomb. Disadvantages were the peUetted converter had 2 to 3 times more weight and volume, took longer to heat up, and was more susceptible to attrition and loss of catalyst in use. The monolithic honeycomb can be mounted in any orientation, whereas the peUetted converter had to be downflow. AdditionaUy, the pressure drop of the monolithic honeycomb is one-half to one-quarter that of a similar function peUetted converter. 

D. W. Wendland and W. R. Matthes, Visualicyation of Automotive Catalytic Converter Internal Flom, SAE 861554,1986 D. W. Wendland, P. L. Sorrell, and J. E. Kreucher, Sources of Monolithic Catalytic Converter Pressure Eoss, SAE 912372, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, Pa., 1991. 

Fig. 23. Pressure drop through a large monolith as a function of He flow rate [27].

The carbons are broadly comparable in terms of their maximum concentration and implied energy efficiency but the two monolithic forms offer the advantage of smaller pressure vessel sizes and improved heat transfer. 

An alternate form of catalyst is pellets. The pellets are available in various diameters or extruded forms. The pellets can have an aluminum oxide coating with a noble metal deposited as the catalyst. The beads are placed in a tray or bed and have a depth of anywhere from 6 to 10 inches. The larger the bead (1/4 inch versus 1/8 inch) the less the pressure drop through the catalyst bed. However, the larger the bead, the less surface area is present in the same volume which translates to less destruction efficiency. Higher pressure drop translates into higher horsepower required for the oxidation system. The noble metal monoliths have a relatively low pressure drop and are typically more expensive than the pellets for the same application. 

Another important constraint comes from the pressure drop across the catalytic bed, which must be kept to a minimum to avoid a loss in engine power and performance. This requirement is satisfied by a very shallow pellet bed of no more than ten pellets deep, a monolithic structure with many open parallel channels, or a pile of metallic screens and saddles. 

The three principal catalyst bed configurations are the pellet bed, the monolith, and the metallic wire meshes. An open structure with large openings is needed to fulfill the requirement of a low pressure drop even at the very high space velocities of 200,000 hr-1. On the other hand, packings with small diameters would provide more external surface area to fulfill the requirement for rapid mass transfer from the g .s stream to the solid surface. The compromise between these two ideals results in a rather narrow range of dimensions pellets are from to 1 in. in diameter, monoliths have 6 to 20 channels/in., and metallic meshes have diameters of about 0.004 to 0.03 in. 

A pellet bed must be shallow to avoid a high pressure drop. Most designs have a depth of 1 to 2 in., representing 5 to 15 layers of pellets. This shallow bed differs considerably from industrial practices in petroleum and chemical plants where a depth of several hundred layers is the rule. The more open monolith and metallic screens offer a lower pressure drop per inch, so that a bed 6 in. deep is still acceptable. Two pellet beds in series would create very high pressure drops. 

Provided that the catalyst is active enough, there will be sufficient conversion of the pollutant gases through the pellet bed and the screen bed. The Sherwood number of CO is almost equal to the Nusselt number, and 2.6% of the inlet CO will not be converted in the monolith. The diffusion coefficient of benzene is somewhat smaller, and 10% of the inlet benzene is not converted in the monolith, no matter how active is the catalyst. This mass transfer limitation can be easily avoided by forcing the streams to change flow direction at the cost of some increased pressure drop. These calculations are comparable with the data in Fig. 22, taken from Carlson 112). 

Control of emissions of CO, VOC, and NOj, is high on the agenda. Heterogeneous catalysis plays a key role and in most cases structured reactors, in particular monoliths, outperform packed beds because of (i) low pressure drop, (ii) flexibility in design for fast reactions, that is, thin catalytic layers with large geometric surface area are optimal, and (iii) attrition resistance [17]. For power plants the large flow... 

The low density of gases makes it more difficult to keep the bubbles dispersed. The bubbles will move to the low-pressure areas, that is, behind the impellers, in the trailing vortices close to the impeller, behind the baffles, and at the inner side after a bend. The bubbles will coalesce in these areas with high gas holdup. It is very difficult to design reactors without low-pressure regions where the low-density fluid will accumulate. One such reactor is the monolith reactor for multiphase flow [32, 33]. 

The consideration of the pressure drop over the monoliths containing a variety of CPSI (cells per in ) for the modeling of honeycomb reactor may be required, since Ap of the reactor strongly depends on CPSI of monolith. Eqn. (7) for the pressure drop of the honeycomb was employed to develop the reactor model describing the performance of the honeycomb fabricated in the present work [8]. and Ke indicate contraction and expansion loss coefficient at the honeycomb inlet and outlet, respectively and o is the ratio of free flow area to frontal area. 

As with the automotive exhaust converter, the SCR catalyst is designed to handle large flows of gas (e.g. 300 N s for a 300 MW power plant) without causing a significant pressure drop. Figure 10.12 shows a reactor arrangement with about 250 m of catalyst in monolithic form, sufficient for a 300 MW power plant. 

Compared with laboratory fixed-bed reactors or conventional extruded monoliths, such a microstructured monolith is smaller in characteristic dimensions, lower in pressure loss by optimized fluid guiding and constructed from the catalytic material solely [3]. The latter aspect also leads to enhanced heat distribution within the micro channels, giving more uniform temperature profiles. 

---