Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Pressure monolayers

The principal requirements for an ideal gaseous film are that the constituent molecules must be of negligible size with no lateral adhesion between them. Such a film would obey an ideal two-dimensional gas equation, ttA kT, i.e. the it-A curve would be a rectangular hyperbola. This ideal state of affairs is, of course, unrealisable but is approximated to by a number of insoluble films, especially at high areas and low surface pressures. Monolayers of soluble material are normally gaseous. If a surfactant solution is sufficiently dilute to allow solute-solute interactions at the surface to be neglected, the lowering of surface tension will be approximately linear with concentration - i.e. [Pg.103]

BEE Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (Large) surface area 1-20 mVg Adsorbed gas (e.g., Nj at low temp.) as function of pressure (monolayer coverage) - - Surface area measurement 60... [Pg.1969]

Over what range of pressure should the isotherm be measured Careful work over an extended pressure range shows that there may be no sharp knee corresponding to the completion of a monolayer on the metal, but rather continuing uptake which appears to approach some saturation limit without ever quite getting there. This implies that the zero-pressure monolayer volume obtained by extrapolation depends upon the pressure range over which the isotherm has been measured (see Figure 3.14). [Pg.117]

Adsorbed gas (e.g., Njat low temp.) as function of pressure (monolayer coverage)... [Pg.1950]

Type II isotherms describe typically adsorption in mesoporous materials showing at low pressures monolayer, at higher pressures near saturation multilayer adsorption and pore condensation but no hysteresis. These isotherms also can be observed in disperse, nonporous or only macroporous solids, (pore diameter > 50 nm). They often can be described by the BET equation or its generalizations, cp. Sects. 3.4, 4.2. [Pg.362]

Langmuir adsorption isotherm A theoretical equation, derived from the kinetic theory of gases, which relates the amount of gas adsorbed at a plane solid surface to the pressure of gas in equilibrium with the surface. In the derivation it is assumed that the adsorption is restricted to a monolayer at the surface, which is considered to be energetically uniform. It is also assumed that there is no interaction between the adsorbed species. The equation shows that at a gas pressure, p, the fraction, 0, of the surface covered by the adsorbate is given by ... [Pg.234]

Such a monolayer may be considered to exert a film pressure ir, such that... [Pg.81]

The deviation of Gibbs monolayers from the ideal two-dimensional gas law may be treated by plotting xA// 7 versus x, as shown in Fig. III-15c. Here, for a series of straight-chain alcohols, one finds deviations from ideality increasing with increasing film pressure at low x values, however, the limiting value of unity for irAfRT is approached. [Pg.83]

Neumann has adapted the pendant drop experiment (see Section II-7) to measure the surface pressure of insoluble monolayers [70]. By varying the droplet volume with a motor-driven syringe, they measure the surface pressure as a function of area in both expansion and compression. In tests with octadecanol monolayers, they found excellent agreement between axisymmetric drop shape analysis and a conventional film balance. Unlike the Wilhelmy plate and film balance, the pendant drop experiment can be readily adapted to studies in a pressure cell [70]. In studies of the rate dependence of the molecular area at collapse, Neumann and co-workers found more consistent and reproducible results with the actual area at collapse rather than that determined by conventional extrapolation to zero surface pressure [71]. The collapse pressure and shape of the pressure-area isotherm change with the compression rate [72]. [Pg.114]

Photoexcited fluorescence from spread monolayers may be studied [158,159] if the substance has both a strong absorption band and a high emission yield as in the case for chlorophyll [159]. Gaines and co-workers [160] have reported on the emission from monolayers of Ru(bipyridine)3, one of the pyridine ligands having attached C g aliphatic chains. Ruorescence depolarization provides information about the restriction of rotational diffusion of molecules in a monolayer [161], Combining pressure-area... [Pg.127]

The three general states of monolayers are illustrated in the pressure-area isotherm in Fig. IV-16. A low-pressure gas phase, G, condenses to a liquid phase termed the /i uid-expanded (LE or L ) phase by Adam [183] and Harkins [9]. One or more of several more dense, liquid-condensed phase (LC) exist at higher pressures and lower temperatures. A solid phase (S) exists at high pressures and densities. We briefly describe these phases and their characteristic features and transitions several useful articles provide a more detailed description [184-187]. [Pg.131]

Fig. IV-21. Surface pressure versus area for monolayers of immiscible components a monolayer of pure cadmium arachidate (curve 1) and monolayers of mixed merocyanine dye, MC2, and cadmium arachidate of molar ratio r = 1 10 (curve 2) 1 5 (curve 3), 1 2 (curve 4), and pure MC2 (curve 5). The subphase is 2.5 x 0 M CdC, pH = 5.5 at 20°C. Curve 3a (O) was calculated from curves 1 and 5 using Eq. IV-44. (From Ref. [116].)... Fig. IV-21. Surface pressure versus area for monolayers of immiscible components a monolayer of pure cadmium arachidate (curve 1) and monolayers of mixed merocyanine dye, MC2, and cadmium arachidate of molar ratio r = 1 10 (curve 2) 1 5 (curve 3), 1 2 (curve 4), and pure MC2 (curve 5). The subphase is 2.5 x 0 M CdC, pH = 5.5 at 20°C. Curve 3a (O) was calculated from curves 1 and 5 using Eq. IV-44. (From Ref. [116].)...
Barnes and Hunter [290] have measured the evaporation resistance across octadecanol monolayers as a function of temperature to test the appropriateness of several models. The experimental results agreed with three theories the energy barrier theory, the density fluctuation theory, and the accessible area theory. A plot of the resistance times the square root of the temperature against the area per molecule should collapse the data for all temperatures and pressures as shown in Fig. IV-25. A similar temperature study on octadecylurea monolayers showed agreement with only the accessible area model [291]. [Pg.148]

The most common situation studied is that of a film reacting with some species in solution in the substrate, such as in the case of the hydrolysis of ester monolayers and of the oxidation of an unsaturated long-chain acid by aqueous permanganate. As a result of the reaction, the film species may be altered to the extent that its area per molecule is different or may be fragmented so that the products are soluble. One may thus follow the change in area at constant film pressure or the change in film pressure at constant area (much as with homogeneous gas reactions) in either case concomitant measurements may be made of the surface potential. [Pg.151]

There is always some degree of adsorption of a gas or vapor at the solid-gas interface for vapors at pressures approaching the saturation pressure, the amount of adsorption can be quite large and may approach or exceed the point of monolayer formation. This type of adsorption, that of vapors near their saturation pressure, is called physical adsorption-, the forces responsible for it are similar in nature to those acting in condensation processes in general and may be somewhat loosely termed van der Waals forces, discussed in Chapter VII. The very large volume of literature associated with this subject is covered in some detail in Chapter XVII. [Pg.350]

As discussed in Chapter III, the progression in adsoiptivities along a homologous series can be understood in terms of a constant increment of work of adsorption with each additional CH2 group. This is seen in self-assembling monolayers discussed in Section XI-IB. The film pressure r may be calculated from the adsorption isotherm by means of Eq. XI-7 as modified for adsorption from dilute solution ... [Pg.394]

It is known that even condensed films must have surface diffusional mobility Rideal and Tadayon [64] found that stearic acid films transferred from one surface to another by a process that seemed to involve surface diffusion to the occasional points of contact between the solids. Such transfer, of course, is observed in actual friction experiments in that an uncoated rider quickly acquires a layer of boundary lubricant from the surface over which it is passed [46]. However, there is little quantitative information available about actual surface diffusion coefficients. One value that may be relevant is that of Ross and Good [65] for butane on Spheron 6, which, for a monolayer, was about 5 x 10 cm /sec. If the average junction is about 10 cm in size, this would also be about the average distance that a film molecule would have to migrate, and the time required would be about 10 sec. This rate of Junctions passing each other corresponds to a sliding speed of 100 cm/sec so that the usual speeds of 0.01 cm/sec should not be too fast for pressurized film formation. See Ref. 62 for a study of another mechanism for surface mobility, that of evaporative hopping. [Pg.450]

If an ionic surfactant is present, the potentials should vary as shown in Fig. XIV-5c, or similarly to the case with nonsurfactant electrolytes. In addition, however, surfactant adsorption decreases the interfacial tension and thus contributes to the stability of the emulsion. As discussed in connection with charged monolayers (see Section XV-6), the mutual repulsion of the charged polar groups tends to make such films expanded and hence of relatively low rr value. Added electrolyte reduces such repulsion by increasing the counterion concentration the film becomes more condensed and its film pressure increases. It thus is possible to explain qualitatively the role of added electrolyte in reducing the interfacial tension and thereby stabilizing emulsions. [Pg.508]

Fig. XV-3. Four types of pressure-area isotherms observed in end-functionalized PDMS monolayers. Up to six transitions (A-F) are observed and described in the text. (From Ref. 6.)... Fig. XV-3. Four types of pressure-area isotherms observed in end-functionalized PDMS monolayers. Up to six transitions (A-F) are observed and described in the text. (From Ref. 6.)...
Fig. XV-9. Fluorescence micrograph of the stripe patterns observed in a monolayer from a mixture of PA and SP-Bi-25 (20% by weight peptide) on a buffered saline subphase at 16 C and zero surface pressure. (From Ref. 55.)... Fig. XV-9. Fluorescence micrograph of the stripe patterns observed in a monolayer from a mixture of PA and SP-Bi-25 (20% by weight peptide) on a buffered saline subphase at 16 C and zero surface pressure. (From Ref. 55.)...
The behavior of insoluble monolayers at the hydrocarbon-water interface has been studied to some extent. In general, a values for straight-chain acids and alcohols are greater at a given film pressure than if spread at the water-air interface. This is perhaps to be expected since the nonpolar phase should tend to reduce the cohesion between the hydrocarbon tails. See Ref. 91 for early reviews. Takenaka [92] has reported polarized resonance Raman spectra for an azo dye monolayer at the CCl4-water interface some conclusions as to orientation were possible. A mean-held theory based on Lennard-Jones potentials has been used to model an amphiphile at an oil-water interface one conclusion was that the depth of the interfacial region can be relatively large [93]. [Pg.551]

Stigter and Dill [98] studied phospholipid monolayers at the n-heptane-water interface and were able to treat the second and third virial coefficients (see Eq. XV-1) in terms of electrostatic, including dipole, interactions. At higher film pressures, Pethica and co-workers [99] observed quasi-first-order phase transitions, that is, a much flatter plateau region than shown in Fig. XV-6. [Pg.552]

Fig. XV-14. Surface pressure-area isotherms at 298 K for a DPPC monolayer on phos-photungstic acid (10 Af) at the pH values shown with 10 A/ NaCl added. (From Ref. 123.)... Fig. XV-14. Surface pressure-area isotherms at 298 K for a DPPC monolayer on phos-photungstic acid (10 Af) at the pH values shown with 10 A/ NaCl added. (From Ref. 123.)...

See other pages where Pressure monolayers is mentioned: [Pg.25]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.540]    [Pg.541]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.546]    [Pg.551]    [Pg.562]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.87 ]




SEARCH



Experimental determination of spreading pressure in monolayers Langmuir balance

Fatty acid monolayers Film pressure

Langmuir monolayers pressure-area isotherms

Mixed monolayers surface pressure

Monolayer film pressure

Monolayer pressure = surface tension difference

Monolayer pressure area isotherms

Monolayer surface pressure

Monolayer surface pressure effect

Monolayers surface pressure—area isotherm

Pressure-Area Isotherms of Langmuirs Monolayers Two-Dimensional Phases

Surface pressure monolayers

Surface pressure-area monolayers spread

© 2024 chempedia.info