Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Predicted interfacial area from

Figure 8. Predicted interfacial area from 3D morphologies (rings, lenses, bulk connected phases) is smaller than measurements reported in the literature by as much as an order of magnitude. The area of Wfilm in drained pores increases during drainage, and when this area is added to the interfacial area, the predictions show the same trend as the data. The measurements have been normalized by the average radius of the grains or beads in each experiment. Figure 8. Predicted interfacial area from 3D morphologies (rings, lenses, bulk connected phases) is smaller than measurements reported in the literature by as much as an order of magnitude. The area of Wfilm in drained pores increases during drainage, and when this area is added to the interfacial area, the predictions show the same trend as the data. The measurements have been normalized by the average radius of the grains or beads in each experiment.
In order to allow for a variation of interfacial area from that of an equivalent sphere, the eccentricity of the ellipsoidal drop must be taken into account. The area ratio of Eq. (44) does not exceed unity by a serious amount until an eccentricity of 1.5 is attained. An experimental plot of eccentricity as ordinate vs. equivalent spherical drop diameter as abscissa may result in a straight line (G7, Kl, K3, S12). A parameter is yet to be developed by which the lines can be predicted without recourse to experiment. Eccentricity is not an accurate shape description of violently oscillating drops and should therefore be used only for drop size below the peak diameter (region B of Fig. 5). [Pg.73]

Other correlations based partially on theoretical considerations but made to fit existing data also exist (71—75). A number of researchers have also attempted to separate from a by measuring the latter, sometimes in terms of the wetted area (76—78). Finally, a number of correlations for the mass transfer coefficient itself exist. These ate based on a mote fundamental theory of mass transfer in packed columns (79—82). Although certain predictions were verified by experimental evidence, these models often cannot serve as design basis because the equations contain the interfacial area as an independent variable. [Pg.37]

Flow Reactors Fast reactions and those in the gas phase are generally done in tubular flow reaclors, just as they are often done on the commercial scale. Some heterogeneous reactors are shown in Fig. 23-29 the item in Fig. 23-29g is suited to liquid/liquid as well as gas/liquid. Stirred tanks, bubble and packed towers, and other commercial types are also used. The operadon of such units can sometimes be predicted from independent data of chemical and mass transfer rates, correlations of interfacial areas, droplet sizes, and other data. [Pg.708]

Although the values of kba dr in the literature are reasonable and comparable each other, the different trend mentioned above may be due to the different operating conditions. The gas-liquid interfacial area(a) and liquid side mass transfer coefHcient(ki) have been determined from the knowledge of measured values of gas holdup and kcacir [11]- The values of a and ki increase almost linearly with increasing Ug or Ul- The values of h cir and ktacir in circulating beds can be predicted by Eqs.(ll) and (12) with a correlation coefBcient of 0.92 and 0.93,... [Pg.105]

GL 27] [R 3] ]P 29] By means of sulfite oxidation, the specific interfacial area of the fluid system nitrogen/water was determined at Weber numbers ranging from lO " to 10 [10]. In this range, the interface increases from 4000 m m to 10 000 m m . The data are - with exceptions - in accordance with optically derived analysis of the interface and predictions from calculations. At stiU larger Weber number up to 10, the specific interfacial area increases up to 17 000 m m, which was determined optically. [Pg.649]

The analysis of two-phase tubular contactors and pipelines is complicated because of the variety of configurations that the two-phase mixture may assume in these systems. The design engineer must have knowledge of the flow pattern that results from a given set of operating conditions if the in situ quantities such as pressure drop, holdup of each phase, phase Reynolds numbers, and interfacial area are to be determined. These in situ quantities must be known if the rate of heat transfer is to be predicted. [Pg.14]

From this discussion of parameter evaluation, it can be seen that more research must be done on the prediction of the flow patterns in liquid-liquid systems and on the development of methods for calculating the resulting holdups, pressure drop, interfacial area, and drop size. Future heat-transfer studies must be based on an understanding of the fluid mechanics so that more accurate correlations can be formulated for evaluating the interfacial and wall heat-transfer coefficients and the Peclet numbers. Equations (30) should provide a basis for analyzing the heat-transfer processes in Regime IV. [Pg.350]

Three main flow patterns exist at various points within the tube bubble, annular, and dispersed flow. In Section I, the importance of knowing the flow pattern and the difficulties involved in predicting the proper flow pattern for a given system were described for isothermal processes. Nonisother-mal systems may have the added complication that the same flow pattern does not exist over the entire tube length. The point of transition from one flow pattern to another must be known if the pressure drop, the holdups, and the interfacial area are to be predicted. In nonisothermal systems, the heat-transfer mechanism is dependent on the flow pattern. Further research on predicting flow patterns in isothermal systems needs to be undertaken... [Pg.352]

The best values of the parameter Cj are 1.51, 1.36, and 2.01 for no mass transfer, d and c direetion of transfer respectively. The product af is considered as the agitation variable in the equation, since the fit could not be improved if a and / were treated separately. The average absolute value of the relative deviation in the predicted values of d 2 from the experimental points is 16.3%. Even in packed columns, the separation can be substantially improved by pulsing of the continuous phase resulting from greater shear forces that reduce the drop size and increase the interfacial area [1, Chapter 8]. [Pg.382]

However, predictions from simple flows, such as those described in Example 7.3 above, cannot be generalized to more realistic systems. Bigg and Middleman (23) analyzed a somewhat more realistic system of flow in a rectangular channel, shown in Fig. 7.15. The motion of the upper surface induces partial mixing of the fluids, and the interfacial area, which was calculated as a function of time, is used as a quantitative measure of the laminar mixing. The marker and cell calculation method, developed by Harlow and Welch (24), was used to solve the flow field and calculate the position of the interface. The evolution of the interface of two fluids of equal viscosities and densities in a channel with an aspect ratio of 0.52, and a... [Pg.340]

Abstract. Surface pressure/area isotherms of monolayers of micro- and nanoparticles at fluid/liquid interfaces can be used to obtain information about particle properties (dimensions, interfacial contact angles), the structure of interfacial particle layers, interparticle interactions as well as relaxation processes within layers. Such information is important for understanding the stabilisation/destabilisation effects of particles for emulsions and foams. For a correct description of II-A isotherms of nanoparticle monolayers, the significant differences in particle size and solvent molecule size should be taken into account. The corresponding equations are derived by using the thermodynamic model of a two-dimensional solution. The equations not only provide satisfactory agreement with experimental data for the surface pressure of monolayers in a wide range of particle sizes from 75 pm to 7.5 nm, but also predict the areas per particle and per solvent molecule close to the experimental values. Similar equations can also be applied to protein molecule monolayers at liquid interfaces. [Pg.79]

No information is available in the published literature pertaining to the gas-liquid interfacial area, aL. It may be assumed that aL equals the disk area exposed to the air. The thickness of the liquid film on a vertically rotating disk partially immersed in a Newtonian liquid has been evaluated by Vijayraghvan and Gupta (1982). They also showed that the measured liquid holdup on the disk compares well with the values predicted from the flat-plate withdrawal theory. The gas-phase pressure drop is very low. The liquid and the gas phases are partially backmixed. The extent of backmixing is reduced by providing baffles. [Pg.138]

Our objective here is to try to answer the following questions For a proposed type of gas-liquid contactor compatible with the properties and flow rates of the phases and with the reaction type, what are the likely values of the specific interfacial area and the gas and liquid mass-transfer coefficients by which the contact performance can be predicted And what is the expected accuracy of these values Table XVIII gives typical values of these parameters in typical contactors shown in Fig. 12 for fluids with properties not very different from those of air and water (especially, liquid viscosity under 5 cP where the liquid is nonfoaming). Because this review is especially concerned with the chemical method of determining these parameters, experimental data obtained by this method will be given in subsequent tables and figures. [Pg.67]

The effective interfacial area a " is increased by increases in ionic strength, ion valence number, or viscosity, by the presence of a solid or immiscible liquid, and by a decrease in liquid surface tension. Thus it is nearly impossible to predict a priori the interfacial area. However, scale-up is practicable from experiments carried out with the actual gas-liquid system in a small agitated contactor (D = 10-20 cm). The experimental work of Sharma et al. (M12, S23) shows that a scale-up basis of equal ndf,/ /D or n - n dJwD (when djD = 0.4-0.5) can be used with a fair degree of confidence (respectively, 10 and 16% average deviations) for agitated vessels with diameters up to 60 cm. [Pg.100]

The next step is measurement, or theoretical calculation when possible, of the average rates of absorption per unit interfacial area of the chemical system in the laboratory model where A l and ka are adjusted to be the same as in the packed column. These measurements are carried out for different liquid and gas compositions representative of different levels in the column and are reported as plots of versus p for different reactant concentration contours. Knowledge of these absorption rates is essential for predictive calculation of the column length h, as the consecutive values of tp from the stirred cell must be used to integrate Eq. (131) between the inlet and outlet conditions ... [Pg.119]

Although no exact correlation between experiment and model was produced by this exercise, it has been shown that the two polymers studied exhibit phase-separated morphologies that are similar in nature to the extent that they are subject to nearly identical polarizations. The large polarizations measured can only be explained by high interfacial areas, congruent with semicrystalline lamellar morphologies. Finally, the divergence of the observed polarizations from those predicted by the two-phase model is quite likely due to the existence of finite-thickness, transition zones between dissimilar domains. [Pg.290]

The bubbles may or may not subsequently recoalesce to some extent, depending on the local fluid dynamics and the interfacial behavior. The unpredictability of this phenomenon rules out a priori prediction of bubble size and interfacial area in general, so design via scale-up from experiments is preferred. [Pg.1132]

The AIChE efficiency modeP was the first to use a rational approach to mass transfer efficiency. Equations (12.74) through (12.83) are used to predict point efficiency. The values of k a, kja, tg, and ti are deduced from laboratory measurements with small test trays containing bubble caps. No attempt is made to evaluate interfacial area a/. The detailed procedure is in reference 71. [Pg.1050]

The pore-scale model provides the basis for development of a statistical framework for upscaling from a single pore to a sample of variably saturated porous medium. The statistical distribution of pore sizes is modeled as a gamma distribution with the expected values of liquid configuration in pore space calculated from geometrical and chemical potential considerations within the statistical framework. Model predictions compare favorably with measured retention data, yielding similarly close fits to data as the widely used van Genuchten parametric model. Liquid-vapor interfacial area as a function of chemical potential is readily calculated from estimated retention parameters. Comparisons of calculated inter-... [Pg.1]


See other pages where Predicted interfacial area from is mentioned: [Pg.145]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.561]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.569]    [Pg.645]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.2010]    [Pg.779]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.715]    [Pg.730]    [Pg.72]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.3 ]




SEARCH



Interfacial area

© 2024 chempedia.info