Phase-separated morphology

CTMA Acrylamide/JV,J T -methylenebisacryl-amide, carboxyethyl acrylate, acrylic acid, Hexagonal No phase transition Macroporous layer-like morphology Phase separation between template and polymer [52]... 

The change in biological response of the adsorbed fibrinogen molecule (conversion), is also noticeable with platelet adhesion studies. In confirmation of earlier studies of Zucker and Vroman (5), we found that, usually, less platelets adhered to areas of glass slides exposed to platelet-poor plasma for 3 min than areas exposed for 3 s. When, however, a gel-filtered platelet suspension was used in place of platelet-rich plasma, a dramatic difference in the number of platelets attached to the surface previously exposed to platelet-poor plasma for 3 s or 3 min occurred. Therefore, this more reproducible protocol was used to study not only the adhesion of platelets onto artificial surfaces but also as a probe of conversion. For this purpose we chose a series of block copolymers with controllable domain morphology (phase separation on a molecular scale) and different surface energies (wettability). Previous studies have shown that the degree of phase separation influences the interactions with blood components (6,7). 

Block copolymers, particularly of the A-B-A type, can exhibit properties that are quite different from those of random copolymers and even from mixtures of homopolymers. The physical behavior of block copolymers is related to their solid state morphology. Phase separation occurs often in such copolymers. This can result in dispersed phases consisting of one block dispersed in a continuous matrix from a second block. Such dispersed phases can be hard domains, either crystalline or glassy, while the matrices are soft and rubber-like. 

Sharma, A. and Jameel, A.T., Nonlinear stability, rupture, and morphological phase separation of thin fluid films on apolar and polar substrates, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 161, 190, 1993. 

Matyjaszewski et al. [2] patented a novel and flexible method for the preparation of CNTs with predetermined morphology. Phase-separated copolymers/stabilized blends of polymers can be pyrolyzed to form the carbon tubular morphology. These materials are referred to as precursor materials. One of the comonomers that form the copolymers can be acrylonitrile, for example. Another material added along with the precursor material is called the sacrificial material. The sacrificial material is used to control the morphology, self-assembly, and distribution of the precursor phase. The primary source of carbon in the product is the precursor. The polymer blocks in the copolymers are immiscible at the micro scale. Free energy and entropic considerations can be used to derive the conditions for phase separation. Lower critical solution temperatures and upper critical solution temperatures (LCST and UCST) are also important considerations in the phase separation of polymers. But the polymers are covalently attached, thus preventing separation at the macro scale. Phase separation is limited to the nanoscale. The nanoscale dimensions typical of these structures range from 5-100 nm. The precursor phase pyrolyzes to form carbon nanostructures. The sacrificial phase is removed after pyrolysis. 

Meng, Q. H., Hu, J. L., Zhu, Y, Lu, J., Liu, Y. (2007b), Morphology, phase separation, thermal and mechanical property differences of shape memory fibers prepared by different spinning methods. Smart Materials and Structures, 16,1192-7. 

Keywords PC ABS blend Closed-spiral flow Morphology Phase separate Boundary layer... 

Mechanical properties of mbber-modifted epoxy resins depend on the extent of mbber-phase separation and on the morphological features of the mbber phase. Dissolved mbber causes plastic deformation and necking at low strains, but does not result in impact toughening. The presence of mbber particles is a necessary but not sufficient condition for achieving impact resistance. Optimum properties are obtained with materials comprising both dissolved and phase-separated mbber (305). 

Because of the aqueous solubiUty of polyelectrolyte precursor polymers, another method of polymer blend formation is possible. The precursor polymer is co-dissolved with a water-soluble matrix polymer, and films of the blend are cast. With heating, the fully conjugated conducting polymer is generated to form the composite film. This technique has been used for poly(arylene vinylenes) with a variety of water-soluble matrix polymers, including polyacrjiamide, poly(ethylene oxide), polyvinylpyrroHdinone, methylceUulose, and hydroxypropylceUulose (139—141). These blends generally exhibit phase-separated morphologies. 

The flow behavior of the polymer blends is quite complex, influenced by the equilibrium thermodynamic, dynamics of phase separation, morphology, and flow geometry [2]. The flow properties of a two phase blend of incompatible polymers are determined by the properties of the component, that is the continuous phase while adding a low-viscosity component to a high-viscosity component melt. As long as the latter forms a continuous phase, the viscosity of the blend remains high. As soon as the phase inversion [2] occurs, the viscosity of the blend falls sharply, even with a relatively low content of low-viscosity component. Therefore, the S-shaped concentration dependence of the viscosity of blend of incompatible polymers is an indication of phase inversion. The temperature dependence of the viscosity of blends is determined by the viscous flow of the dispersion medium, which is affected by the presence of a second component. 

Although Eq. (13) has been reported to fit the data well for Cl = 3.5, and C2 = - 2.0, it provides no information on the phase separation process. In fact, there is little understanding about how the physical morphology and mechanical properties evolve with polymerization and time. The effect of various process parameters on the phase separation and morphology is obtained implicitly via final properties of the polymers. This is illustrated... 

Consequently, interpenetrating phase-separated D/A network composites, i.e. bulk heterojunction , would appear to be ideal photovoltaic materials [5]. By controlling the morphology of the phase separation into an interpenetrating network, one can achieve a high interfacial area within a bulk material. Since any point in the composite is within a few nanometers of a D/A interface, such a composite is a bulk D/A heterojunction material. If the network in a device is bicontinuous, as shown in Figure 15-26, the collection efficiency can be equally efficient. 

---