Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Predator-prey relationships

Figure 11.4. (a) Flow-model scheme for a simple food chain with one predator-prey relationship. See text for discussion, (b) The steps involved whereby atoms from prey collagen (i.e., the diet) may be transferred to a predator s collagen (i.e., the consumer tissue). Each arrow represents a potential change in carbon isotopic composition, complicating the relationship between prey collagen 5 C and predator 5 C. [Pg.235]

In a similar way, an integrated biomarker approach has a role when carrying out experiments in mesocosms. Under these controlled conditions, behavioral effects of neurotoxic pollutants, acting singly or in combination, can be monitored and compared with data on predator-prey relationships and effects at the population level. The employment of mechanistic biomarker assays can facilitate comparisons between results obtained in mesocosms and other data obtained in the field or in laboratory tests. Here is one way of attempting to answer the difficult question— how comparable are mesocosms to the real world ... [Pg.314]

Elvira B, Nicola GG, Almodovar A (1996) Pike and red swamp crayfish a new case on predator-prey relationship between aliens in central Spain. J Fish Biol 48 437 146... [Pg.257]

Calderisi, D. (1997) Different scents for different responses in predator-prey relationships as a form of enrichment in captive animals. In V. Hare and K. Worley (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Environmental Enrichment, Sea World, Florida, pp. 155-161. [Pg.397]

Prey fish may mask their own odors. Some marine fish avoid predation by covering their body odors. Some parrot fish (Scaridae) sleep in a mucus cocoon. It is believed that this covers up its scent and protects it from predation. Table 12.1 summarizes some chemical predator-prey relationships in marine fish. [Pg.340]

Fry of the Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, probably rely on olfactory and gustatory stimuli for their first meal. Injured prey such as small crustaceans will leak free amino acids, which can serve as a feeding signal to the fish fry. Such handicapped prey will be easier to catch for the fry. If the prey is dead, and/or its free amino acids are depleted, the fry show no interest in them. In this way, the salmon can optimize its capturing efforts as well as its prey digestion. In laboratory experiments, frozen daphnids leaked as much as 35% of its methionine upon thawing. On their first 3 days of feeding, salmon fry typically chose undepleted daphnids first and virtually all spit-out prey were depleted daphnids (Holm and Walther, 1988). Table 12.2 lists some chemical predator-prey relationships in freshwater fish. [Pg.342]

Spinella, A., Alvarez, L. A., and Cimino, G., Predator-prey relationship between Navanax inermis and Bulla gouldiana a chemical approach, Tetrahedron, 49, 3203, 1993. [Pg.113]

Heron, A.C., A specialized predator-prey relationship between the copepod Sapphirina augusta and the pelagic tunicate Thalia democratia, J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK, 53, 429, 1973. [Pg.220]

Like humans, ecosystems are exposed to multiple chemicals at any given time. This implies exposure of individuals, species, and ecosystems. The exposure conditions vary considerably, and are determined by the characteristics of the exposure medium as well as by physiological characteristics and behavior of the exposed species and individuals. The object of concern can be separate species, like protected birds, mammals, or butterflies, or it can be assemblages or communities of different organisms or ecosystems. The concern can pertain to the structure or the function of the system, or both. Stressors like mixture exposures may trigger a multitude of responses in ecosystems, including indirect effects due to changes in competition and predator-prey relationships. [Pg.173]

Cal] R. P. Canale (1969), Predator-prey relationships in a model for the activated process, Biotechnology and Bioengineering 11 887-907. [Pg.300]

Pl-lSx (a) There are initially 500 rabbits (x) and 200 foxes (y) on Farmer Oat s property, Use POLYMATH or MATLAB to plot the concentration of foxes and rabbits as a function of time for a period of up to 500 days. The predator-prey relationships are given by the following set of coupled ordinary differential equations ... [Pg.32]

Any effects on populations may ultimately be manifested as effects on communities because, by definition, communities are collections of interacting populations of several species (e.g., an aquatic community may consist of populations of fish, worms, plants, insects). Individual populations within a community may interact by competing for resources (food, habitat, etc.) or by predator/prey relationships. Environmental contaminants can affect the structure of communities as well as the interactions of species within them. For example, it is well known that exposure to chemicals may cause a reduction in community diversity (e.g., relative number of species), and changes in community composition. In addition, the trophic structure of fish and invertebrate communities may also be affected by exposure to anthropogenic chemicals. Changes in community structure and diversity may be determined by field sampling or manipulative studies. Alternatively, computer simulations using food web or linked population models may be used to assess community-level effects. [Pg.929]

A terrestrial food web (e.g.. Figure 1) is a simplified representation of the complex interactions of below-ground processes and above-ground plants and animals. It is used to illustrate the trophic level and predator-prey relationships among selected terrestrial receptors and their potential food items. Terrestrial ecotoxicology uses information about the structure of a local food web to make predictions about how pollutants may move from soil and into plants or animals at various trophic levels, including those possibly some distance from the source of the pollutant. [Pg.951]

Fishery and hydrography are obviously major driving forces of the fate of the cod stock in the Baltic main basin. Nevertheless, reducing it to these two factors would oversimphfy the picture. From the previous and Fig. 18.15 it becomes apparent that while cod stocks have dechned over the last two decades, the clupeoid species (especially sprat) have increased. The predator-prey relationships between cod and sprat are another important factor for the abundance of the stocks, here, namely cod. In the absence of a large foraging cod stock, sprat... [Pg.566]

The parasitic cycle was modeled via the predator-prey relationship between foxes and voles plus the infection of voles due to the defecation behavior of foxes (Figure 8.4). Numerical values for parameters were extracted from the literature. Simulation experiments were performed for 20-year periods. Scenarios with different treatment intervals and different total numbers of campaigns (duration of control program) were tested (Figure 8.5). [Pg.99]

The presence of the same or closely related compounds in multiple phyla in instances in which a predator/prey relationship cannot be established for the organisms. The isolation of p3oidinoacndine alkaloids, such as dercitamide (Scheme 24), from both the sponge Dercitus sp. and the ascidian Cystodytes (47) is an example of this. [Pg.397]

Parts III, IV and V deal with the distribution of trace elements in biota and reservoirs (soils and sediments). In this context, it should be noted that organisms, populations, biocenoses and finally the entire ecosystem are influenced by a number of different biotic and abiotic stressors under natural conditions. These are for example climatic changes, variations in radiation regimes or availability of food resources, predator-prey relationships, parasites, diseases, intraspecific and interspecific competition. Stress is an existential prerequisite for all biological levels of organization, as it... [Pg.589]

Our present understanding of predator-prey relationships suggests a number of intriguing issues, particularly with respect to the ecological implications of chemo-sensory orientation. [Pg.80]

Autocatalysis is involved in the first two steps of this process. It appears that oscillating chemical reactions have mechanisms that are different from the Lotka-Volterra mechanism. This type of mechanism does occur in certain types of complex system such as predator-prey relationships in biology. It was in the biological context that the mechanism was investigated by the Italian mathematician Vito Volterra (1860-1940). [Pg.134]


See other pages where Predator-prey relationships is mentioned: [Pg.55]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.4556]    [Pg.1022]    [Pg.501]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.488]    [Pg.659]    [Pg.18]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.129 ]




SEARCH



Predate

Predation

Predators

Prey

© 2024 chempedia.info