Porous pore size

The method to be described determines the pore size distribution in a porous material or compacted powder surface areas may be inferred from the results. 

We have considered briefly the important macroscopic description of a solid adsorbent, namely, its speciflc surface area, its possible fractal nature, and if porous, its pore size distribution. In addition, it is important to know as much as possible about the microscopic structure of the surface, and contemporary surface spectroscopic and diffraction techniques, discussed in Chapter VIII, provide a good deal of such information (see also Refs. 55 and 56 for short general reviews, and the monograph by Somoijai [57]). Scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and atomic force microscopy (AFT) are now widely used to obtain the structure of surfaces and of adsorbed layers on a molecular scale (see Chapter VIII, Section XVIII-2B, and Ref. 58). On a less informative and more statistical basis are site energy distributions (Section XVII-14) there is also the somewhat laige-scale type of structure due to surface imperfections and dislocations (Section VII-4D and Fig. XVIII-14). 

Below the critical temperature of the adsorbate, adsorption is generally multilayer in type, and the presence of pores may have the effect not only of limiting the possible number of layers of adsorbate (see Eq. XVII-65) but also of introducing capillary condensation phenomena. A wide range of porous adsorbents is now involved and usually having a broad distribution of pore sizes and shapes, unlike the zeolites. The most general characteristic of such adsorption systems is that of hysteresis as illustrated in Fig. XVII-27 and, more gener-... 

At the present time there exist no flux relations wich a completely sound cheoretical basis, capable of describing transport in porous media over the whole range of pressures or pore sizes. All involve empiricism to a greater or less degree, or are based on a physically unrealistic representation of the structure of the porous medium. Existing models fall into two main classes in the first the medium is modeled as a network of interconnected capillaries, while in the second it is represented by an assembly of stationary obstacles dispersed in the gas on a molecular scale. The first type of model is closely related to the physical structure of the medium, but its development is hampered by the lack of a solution to the problem of transport in a capillary whose diameter is comparable to mean free path lengths in the gas mixture. The second type of model is more tenuously related to the real medium but more tractable theoretically. 

The relation between the dusty gas model and the physical structure of a real porous medium is rather obscure. Since the dusty gas model does not even contain any explicit representation of the void fraction, it certainly cannot be adjusted to reflect features of the pore size distributions of different porous media. For example, porous catalysts often show a strongly bimodal pore size distribution, and their flux relations might be expected to reflect this, but the dusty gas model can respond only to changes in the... 

The simplest way of introducing Che pore size distribution into the model is to permit just two possible sizes--Tnlcropores and macropotes--and this simple pore size distribution is not wholly unrealistic, since pelleted materials are prepared by compressing powder particles which are themselves porous on a much smaller scale. The small pores within the powder grains are then the micropores, while the interstices between adjacent grains form the macropores. An early and well known model due to Wakao and Smith [32] represents such a material by the Idealized structure shown in Figure 8,2,... 

An interesting example of a large specific surface which is wholly external in nature is provided by a dispersed aerosol composed of fine particles free of cracks and fissures. As soon as the aerosol settles out, of course, its particles come into contact with one another and form aggregates but if the particles are spherical, more particularly if the material is hard, the particle-to-particle contacts will be very small in area the interparticulate junctions will then be so weak that many of them will become broken apart during mechanical handling, or be prized open by the film of adsorbate during an adsorption experiment. In favourable cases the flocculated specimen may have so open a structure that it behaves, as far as its adsorptive properties are concerned, as a completely non-porous material. Solids of this kind are of importance because of their relevance to standard adsorption isotherms (cf. Section 2.12) which play a fundamental role in procedures for the evaluation of specific surface area and pore size distribution by adsorption methods. 

A Type II isotherm indicates that the solid is non-porous, whilst the Type IV isotherm is characteristic of a mesoporous solid. From both types of isotherm it is possible, provided certain complications are absent, to calculate the specific surface of the solid, as is explained in Chapter 2. Indeed, the method most widely used at the present time for the determination of the surface area of finely divided solids is based on the adsorption of nitrogen at its boiling point. From the Type IV isotherm the pore size distribution may also be evaluated, using procedures outlined in Chapter 3. 

Isotherms of Type 111 and Type V, which are the subject of Chapter 5, seem to be characteristic of systems where the adsorbent-adsorbate interaction is unusually weak, and are much less common than those of the other three types. Type III isotherms are indicative of a non-porous solid, and some halting steps have been taken towards their use for the estimation of specific surface but Type V isotherms, which betoken the presence of porosity, offer little if any scope at present for the evaluation of either surface area or pore size distribution. 

Type IV isotherms are often found with inorganic oxide xerogels and other porous solids. With certain qualifications, which will be discussed in this chapter, it is possible to analyse Type IV isotherms (notably those of nitrogen at 77 K) so as to obtain a reasonable estimate of the specific surface and an approximate assessment of the pore size distribution. 

A factor militating against the use of other adsorptives for pore size determination at the present time is the lack of reliable r-curves. The number of published isotherms of vapours such as benzene, carbon tetrachloride or the lower alkanes, or even such simple inorganic substances as carbon dioxide, on a reasonable number of well-defined non-porous adsorbents, is very small. 

The principal aim of the second edition of this book remains the same as that of the first edition to give a critical exposition of the use of the adsorption methods for the assessment of the surface area and pore size distribution of finely divided and porous solids. 

In writing the present book our aim has been to give a critical exposition of the use of adsorption data for the evaluation of the surface area and the pore size distribution of finely divided and porous solids. The major part of the book is devoted to the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method for the determination of specific surface, and the use of the Kelvin equation for the calculation of pore size distribution but due attention has also been given to other well known methods for the estimation of surface area from adsorption measurements, viz. those based on adsorption from solution, on heat of immersion, on chemisorption, and on the application of the Gibbs adsorption equation to gaseous adsorption. 

It would be difficult to over-estimate the extent to which the BET method has contributed to the development of those branches of physical chemistry such as heterogeneous catalysis, adsorption or particle size estimation, which involve finely divided or porous solids in all of these fields the BET surface area is a household phrase. But it is perhaps the very breadth of its scope which has led to a somewhat uncritical application of the method as a kind of infallible yardstick, and to a lack of appreciation of the nature of its basic assumptions or of the circumstances under which it may, or may not, be expected to yield a reliable result. This is particularly true of those solids which contain very fine pores and give rise to Langmuir-type isotherms, for the BET procedure may then give quite erroneous values for the surface area. If the pores are rather larger—tens to hundreds of Angstroms in width—the pore size distribution may be calculated from the adsorption isotherm of a vapour with the aid of the Kelvin equation, and within recent years a number of detailed procedures for carrying out the calculation have been put forward but all too often the limitations on the validity of the results, and the difficulty of interpretation in terms of the actual solid, tend to be insufficiently stressed or even entirely overlooked. And in the time-honoured method for the estimation of surface area from measurements of adsorption from solution, the complications introduced by... 

Two classes of micron-sized stationary phases have been encountered in this section silica particles and cross-linked polymer resin beads. Both materials are porous, with pore sizes ranging from approximately 50 to 4000 A for silica particles and from 50 to 1,000,000 A for divinylbenzene cross-linked polystyrene resins. In size-exclusion chromatography, also called molecular-exclusion or gel-permeation chromatography, separation is based on the solute s ability to enter into the pores of the column packing. Smaller solutes spend proportionally more time within the pores and, consequently, take longer to elute from the column. 

As illustrated ia Figure 6, a porous adsorbent ia contact with a fluid phase offers at least two and often three distinct resistances to mass transfer external film resistance and iatraparticle diffusional resistance. When the pore size distribution has a well-defined bimodal form, the latter may be divided iato macropore and micropore diffusional resistances. Depending on the particular system and the conditions, any one of these resistances maybe dominant or the overall rate of mass transfer may be determined by the combiaed effects of more than one resistance. 

Fig. 3. Microporous membranes are characterized by tortuosity, T, porosity, S, and their average pore diameter, d. (a) Cross-sections of porous membranes containing cylindrical pores, (b) Surface views of porous membranes of equal S, but differing pore size.

The sol—gel technique has been used mosdy to prepare alumina membranes. Figure 18 shows a cross section of a composite alumina membrane made by sHp coating successive sols with different particle sizes onto a porous ceramic support. SiUca or titanium membranes could also be made by the same principles. Unsupported titanium dioxide membranes with pore sizes of 5 nm or less have been made by the sol—gel process (57). 

Membranes. Membranes comprised of activated alumina films less than 20 )J.m thick have been reported (46). These films are initially deposited via sol—gel technology (qv) from pseudoboehmite sols and are subsequently calcined to produce controlled pore sizes in the 2 to 10-nm range. Inorganic membrane systems based on this type of film and supported on soHd porous substrates have been introduced commercially. They are said to have better mechanical and thermal stabiUty than organic membranes (47). The activated alumina film comprises only a miniscule part of the total system (see Mel rane technology). 

The use of porous formers ia the dippiag process, or porous molds prepared from plaster of Paris or uaglazed porcelaia with a surface pore size smaller than the majority of mbber particles, has been widely adopted ia the latex iadustry. With the porous porcelaia formers, the mbber particles are filtered oa the surface of the formers. The mbber latex coagulates because of its high coaceatratioa to form a film of increa sing thickness as more water is absorbed iato the ceramic. Its rate of iacrease diminishes sharply beyoad an optimum period of time, however, depending on the various characteristics of the ceramic. 

Supports. The principal component of a typical catalyst is the porous support (49,50). Most supports are robust soHds that can be made with wide ranges of surface areas and pore size distributions. The most widely appHed supports are metal oxides others are carbon, kieselguhr, organic polymers, and zeoHtes. 

Capillarity. The outer surface of porous material has pore entrances of various sizes. As surface Hquid is evaporated during constant rate drying, a meniscus forms across each pore entrance and interfacial forces are set up between the Hquid and material. These forces may draw Hquid from the interior to the surface. The tendency of Hquid to rise in porous material is caused pardy by Hquid surface tension. Surface tension is defined as the work needed to increase a Hquid s surface area by one square meter and has the units J/m. The pressure increase caused by surface tension is related to pore size ... 

Physical properties of catalysts also may need to be checked periodically, includiug pellet size, specific surface, porosity, pore size and size distribution, and effective diffusivity. The effectiveness of a porous catalyst is found by measuring conversions with successively smaller pellets until no further change occurs. These topics are touched on by Satterfield (Heterogeneous Cataly.sls in Jndustiial Practice, McGraw-Hill, 1991). 

---