Porogen method

Monodispersed poly (methyl methacrylate-ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate) is prepared by a multistep swelling and polymerization method. When a good solvent such as toluene is applied as a porogen, the seed polymer severely affects the pore structure, whereas no effects are observed with poor solvents, such as cyclohexanol, as a porogen, in comparison with the conventional suspension polymerization (68,69). 

In the multistep swelling and polymerization method, polymerization time, temperature, and initiator concentration have marginal effects only. The ratio of monovinyl to divinyl monomer in the polymerization mixture, along with the composition of the porogenic systems, is known to be the most important factor in controlling the ultimate macroporous structure. The average molecular... 

A potentiometric sensor for the determination of hydroxyzine in tablets and biological fluids has been reported by Javanbakht et al. [121]. This is probably the first carbon paste electrode described in the literature based on MIPs and potentiometric detection. The polymer was prepared with a very general composition, MAA as functional monomer, EDMA as the cross linker, and chloroform as porogen. Response range was found to be 0.01-100 mM, with a moderate response time (SOTO min). The method was applied to the analysis of hydroxyzine in tablets, spiked human serum, and human urine. 

Table 4 lists porosity values determined from mercury porosimetry. These preliminary values agree with those expected based on the proportion of porogen used to make the scaffolds for samples B and E. However there are significant differences between the porosity estimates for samples A and C and those expected based on sample composition. Intrusion methods were not suitable to characterize sample D due to its low permeability. 

Cross-linked polystyrene porous particles (with 21 mol% DVB) have been prepared by the concentrated emulsion polymerization method, using either toluene or decane as the porogen and an aqueous solution of SDS as the continuous phase. Since toluene is a good solvent for polystyrene while decane is a nonsolvent , the morphologies obtained in the two cases were different. The particles based on toluene (with a volume fraction of dispersed phase of 78%) have very small pores which could not be detected in the SEM pictures. The pore size distribution, which has sizes between 20 and 50 A and was determined with an adsorption analyzer, almost coincides with that in a previous study [49] in which porous polystyrene beads have been prepared by suspension polymerization. In contrast, the porous particles based on decane have pore sizes as large as 0.1-0.3 pm, which could be detected in the SEM pictures [44a], and also larger surface areas (47 m2 g ) than those based on toluene (25 m2 g ). The main difference between the concentrated emulsion polymerization and the suspension polymerization consists of the much smaller volume fraction of continuous phase used in the former procedure. The gel-like emulsion that constitutes the precursor in the former case contains polyhedral cells separated by thin films of continuous phase. The polymerization of the cells does not... 

Another in situ preparation of molecularly imprinted columns employs dispersion polymerisation, whereby agglomerated polymer particles are obtained [16]. The procedure is similar to the rod preparation a mixture of the chemicals for the polymer preparation, such as a template, a functional monomer, a cross-linker, a porogen and an initiator is put in a column and heated to effect polymerisation. This method also requires polar solvents, such as cyclohexanol-dodecanol and isopropanol-water, to obtain aggregated polymer particles of well-defined micro-sises. A crucial difference with the rod preparation lies in the volume of the porogen used larger volumes of porogens are used in dispersion polymerisation. 

One-step method for the preparation of highly enantioselective monolithic columns for CEC has been developed by Frechet et al. The chiral polymer bed of defined pore distribution and chiral ligand concentration has been synthesized within the confines of untreated fused silica capillaries using a mixture of O-[2-(methacryloyloxy)ethylcarbamoyl]-10,ll-dihydroquinidine 76, ethylene dimethacrylate (EDMA), and glycidyl methacrylate or 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) in the mixture of cyclohexanol and 1-dodecanol as porogenic solvents. Under optimized synthetic and chromatographic conditions, these materials with the desired characteristics were demonstrated to efficiently separate a model racemic DNZ-Leu, Figure 13.24 [146],... 

In this review, nanoporous dielectric materials have been presented. The preparation techniques, methods of pore generation, and materials classification were discussed. Inorganic, organic, and hybrid films were also discussed. The nanoporous dielectric films were classified by preparation method, which includes block copolymer, solvent as porogen approach, surfactant templating, and sol-gel approach. This is still a very active field of research because no one film has satisfied all the stringent requirements in semiconductor device processing. 

---