Polystyrenes distribution

Figure 20 shows an example of its use. As expected, the GPC 2 chromatogram of a fraction of a monodisperse standard (obtained by sampling it with GPC 2 at its peak) is narrower than the whole standard which in turn is narrower than chromatograms of slices of broad polystyrene distributions. In Figure 20, two examples of the latter show the difference obtained by improving resolution in GPC 1. 

Figure 8.17 Isotherms showing the recoverable creep compliance for a narrow polystyrene distribution with molecular weight 3400. (From Ref. 16.)...

The refractograp of figure 4 shows highly oriented micro cracks of a polystyrene sample. The orientation of the cracks is perpendicular to the mechanical strain direction. The X-ray refracted intensitiy can be interpreted as crack density, i.e. the inner surfaces within a unit volume. Changing the tilt angle (of polystyrene and polystyrene blend samples) with respect to the primary beam leads to significantly different distributions of crack orientation (Fig. 5). 

In some lUPAC-sponsored researchf, samples of the same polystyrene preparation were distributed among different laboratories for characterization. The following molecular weights were obtained for one particular sample by osmotic pressure experiments using the solvents, membranes, and temperatures listed below ... 

Three polystyrene samples of narrow molecular weight distribution were investigatedf for their retention in GPC columns in which the average particle size of the packing was varied. In all instances the peaks were well resolved. The following results were obtained ... 

Phase Separation. Microporous polymer systems consisting of essentially spherical, intercoimected voids, with a narrow range of pore and ceU-size distribution have been produced from a variety of thermoplastic resins by the phase-separation technique (127). If a polyolefin or polystyrene is insoluble in a solvent at low temperature but soluble at high temperatures, the solvent can be used to prepare a microporous polymer. When the solutions, containing 10—70% polymer, are cooled to ambient temperatures, the polymer separates as a second phase. The remaining nonsolvent can then be extracted from the solid material with common organic solvents. These microporous polymers may be useful in microfiltrations or as controlled-release carriers for a variety of chemicals. 

Fig. 4. Molecular weight distribution curves for representative polystyrenes.

Polymer—Cp—MCl complexes have been formed with the Cp-group covalendy bound to a polystyrene bead. The metal complex is uniformly distributed throughout the bead, as shown by electron microprobe x-ray fluorescence. Olefin hydrogenation catalysts were then prepared by reduction with butyl hthium (262). 

Albertsson (Paiiition of Cell Paiiicle.s and Macromolecules, 3d ed., Wiley, New York, 1986) has extensively used particle distribution to fractionate mixtures of biological products. In order to demonstrate the versatility of particle distribution, he has cited the example shown in Table 22-14. The feed mixture consisted of polystyrene particles, red blood cells, starch, and cellulose. Liquid-liquid particle distribution has also been studied by using mineral-matter particles (average diameter = 5.5 Im) extracted from a coal liquid as the solid in a xylene-water system [Prudich and Heniy, Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J., 24(5), 788 (1978)]. By using surface-active agents in order to enhance the water wettability of the solid particles, recoveries of better than 95 percent of the particles to the water phase were obsei ved. All particles remained in the xylene when no surfactant was added. 

After brief discussion of the state-of-the-art of modern Py-GC/MS, some most recent applications for stixictural and compositional chai acterization of polymeric materials are described in detail. These include microstixictural studies on sequence distributions of copolymers, stereoregularity and end group chai acterization for various vinyl-type polymers such as polystyrene and polymethyl methacrylate by use of conventional analytical pyrolysis. 

Polystyrene produced by free-radical polymerisation techniques is part syndio-tactic and part atactic in structure and therefore amorphous. In 1955 Natta and his co-workers reported the preparation of substantially isotactic polystyrene using aluminium alkyl-titanium halide catalyst complexes. Similar systems were also patented by Ziegler at about the same time. The use of n-butyl-lithium as a catalyst has been described. Whereas at room temperature atactic polymers are produced, polymerisation at -30°C leads to isotactic polymer, with a narrow molecular weight distribution. 

In the 1990s this approach became more common in order to ensure sufficient compressive strength with the trend to lower bulk densities. Furthermore the proportion of SAN to polyol has been increased to about 40%. This may lead to serious stability problems and care must be taken to control the size and distribution of the particles and prevent agglomeration. Polymer polyols using polystyrene as the polymer component have recently become available (Postech-Shell) and are claimed to exhibit good stability, low viscosity and less discolouration as well as providing price advantages. 

The pore size, the pore-size distribution, and the surface area of organic polymeric supports can be controlled easily during production by precipitation processes that take place during the conversion of liquid microdroplets to solid microbeads. For example, polystyrene beads produced without cross-linked agents or diluent are nonporous or contain very small pores. However, by using bigb divinylbenzene (DVB) concentrations and monomer diluents, polymer beads with wide porosities and pore sizes can be produced, depending on the proportion of DVB and monomer diluent. Control of porosity by means of monomer diluent has been extensively studied for polystyrene (3-6) and polymethacrylate (7-10). 

A range of individual pore size PLgel packing materials is produced and their pore size distribution is conveniently represented by a SEC calibration curve as illustrated in Fig. 12.1. It should be pointed out that the descriptors used for the different pore sizes, 50 A, 100 A, and so on, are not the actual pore sizes of the beads but relate to the size of a polystyrene molecule just excluded from the packing material. This nomenclature comes from the original work carried out by Moore (3) and should only be viewed in the context of differentiating... 

The ISO method prescribes polystyrene standards with tetrahydrofuran as the eluent, but this equation can also be used with other narrow distribution standards, provided the same elution solvent and the same standards are used for a comparison. Further, the ISO method requires the result to be greater than 6 for one decade of the molar mass. Because calibration curves are usually not linear, this decade should lie nearly symmetrically around the peak maxima of the samples in question. The required value of 6 is easy to fulfill, as results of 10 or more are usual with modern columns. If so-named linear or mixed... 

The result of this equation describes the quality of the separation on the basis of an ideal size exclusion mechanism with a given pore volume distribution. The quality of the packing is deliberately excluded from this consideration. This parameter should be measured separately and judged by the plate number. The ASTM standard method for HPSEC of polystyrene (4) contains the following equation for resolution (R,) ... 

ASTM D 5296 - 92 (1994). Standard Test Method for Molecular Weight Averages and Moleeular Weight Distribution of Polystyrene by High Performance Size-Exclusion Chromatography. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol.08.03, pp. 419-431. 

In this stage of the investigation, poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMAs) were selected as the polymeric probes of intermediate polarity. Polymers of medium broad molar mass distribution and of low tacticity (14) were a gift of Dr. W. Wunderlich of Rohm Co., Darmstadt, Germany. Their molar masses ranged from 1.6 X 10" to 6.13 X 10 g-mol. For some comparative tests, narrow polystyrene standards from Pressure Co. (Pittsburgh, PA) were used. 

Determinarion of MW and MWD by SEC using commercial narrow molecular weight distribution polystyrene as calibration standards is an ASTM-D5296 standard method for polystyrene (11). However, no data on precision are included in the 1997 edition of the ASTM method. In the ASTM-D3536 method for gel-permeation chromatography from seven replicates, the M of a polystyrene is 263,000 30,000 (11.4%) for a single determination within the 95% confidence level (12). A relative standard deviation of 3.9% was reported for a cooperative determination of of polystyrene by SEC (7). In another cooperative study, a 11.3% relative standard deviation in M, of polystyrene by GPC was reported (13). 

---