Polymerization, activation solvent effects

Nevertheless, there is still much work to do in this field. The inclusion of solvent and/or counterions is just at the beginning, and solvent effects have been included with continuum models only. In the next years we will probably arrive to dynamically simulate the whole polymerization process in the presence of the counterion and of explicit solvent molecules. As for the experimental issues which have been not rationalized yet computationally, we remark that still it is not easy to model the relative activity of different catalysts, and even to predict if a certain catalyst will show any activity at all. Moreover, copolymerizations still represent an untackled problem. However, considering the pace at which the understanding of once obscure facts progressed it is not difficult to predict that also these challenges will be positively solved. 

The activity of polymer-supported crown ethers depends on solvent. As shown in Fig. 11, rates for Br-I exchange reactions with catalysts 34 and 41 increased with a change in solvent from toluene to chlorobenzene. Since the reaction with catalyst 34 is limited substantially by intrinsic reactivity (Fig. 10), the rate increase must be due to an increase in intrinsic reactivity. The reaction with catalyst 41 is limited by both intrinsic reactivity and intraparticle diffusion (Fig. 10), and the rate increase from toluene to chlorobenzene corresponds with increases in both parameters. Solvent effects on rates with polymer-supported phase transfer catalysts differ from those with soluble phase transfer catalysts60. With the soluble catalysts rates increase (for a limited number of reactions) with decreased polarity of solvent60), while with the polymeric catalysts rates increase with increased polarity of solvent74). Solvents swell polymer-supported catalysts and influence the microenvironment of active sites as well as intraparticle diffusion. The microenvironment, especially hydration... 

While considering the rate-enhancing effect of bromobenzene in MMA polymerization initiated by AIBN, Henrici-Olive and Olive (19) noted that the effect can be explained as the consequence of electron donor—acceptor complex formation between polymer radicals and monomer or solvent molecules. Based on this view, these authors have shown that in polymerization in active solvents (which enhance the rate), the degree of polymerization Pn appears as a linear function of M2/Rp with... 

Mechanization and automation are possible in the synthesis of peptides using solid polymeric active esters also. By passing a solution of the amine component in a suitable solvent through a column packed with the solid polymeric activated carboxyl component, mechanization could be effected. The product, the protected peptide, which is in the eluent, is then N-deprotected, and the product in solution is passed... 

Examples of preparation of copolymers are scarce. Mun et al. [81, 82] showed that the binary system of cobaltocene/ bis(ethylacetoacetato) copper (II) effectively initiates the living radical polymerizaton of MMA at 25 °C in acetonitrile. The polymerization activity of this initiator system was markedly affected by the solvent used. The synthesis of PMMA-b-PS copolymers with molecular weights reaching 700000 was successfully attempted by adding styrene to the living PMMA. The yield of the copolymers reached 80% when the MMA polymerization was carried out for three days. The same team [91] also synthesized PS-b-PMMA copolymers from the polymerization of MMA with polystyrene obtained in the presence of reduced nickel/halide systems. The yields range from 84 to 91% depending on the halide complex used. 

However, the introduction of the solvent into the polymerization medium poses new problems. The solvents must be pure, without inhibiting and transfer agents. Every solvent takes part in the polymerization process its effect is almost never limited to the mere physical dilution of the monomer. It solvates the active centres it participates in processes connected with energy and impulse transfer often it serves as a transfer agent (so that the degrees of polymerization of solution-polymerized products are usually lower compared with bulk-polymerized polymers) it may form complexes with some component of the system it modifies initiation efficiency by the cage effect etc. 

Controlled/living systems can be usually obtained when the polymerization is sufficiently slow and when either nucleophilic anions or additives are present (Sections IV and V). This means that the proportion of carbenium ions should be low and conversion to dormant species, fast. Nevertheless, under such conditions cationic species can be detected by dynamic NMR, by ligand exchange, salt, and solvent effects, and by other methods discussed in Chapters 2, 3, and in this section. Under typical controlled/living conditions, dormant species such as onium ions and covalent esters predominate. It is possible that the active species are strongly solvated by monomer and by some additives. These interactions may lead to a stabilization of the carbocations. However, in the most general case, this stabilization has a dynamic sense and can be described by the reversible exchange between carbocations and dormant species. 

The relevance of thymine/2,6-diaminotriazine interactions has been exploited by a variety of authors to effect a reversible, yet stable association of catalysts, nanoparticles and other fimctional molecules onto polymeric molecules. Thus, Shen et al. [94,95] reported on the formation of catalyst-supported structures for ATRP-polymerization via hydrogenbonding systems (Fig. 19). The relevant Cu(I)-catalyst was affixed onto a poly(styrene) gel either via the thymine/2,6-diaminopyridine or the maleimide/2,6-diaminopyridine couple. The catalyst was able to mediate a living polymerization reaction of MMA in both cases, obviously acting in its dissociated form. The catalyst could be reused, retaining about half of its catalytic activity for further use. A strong solvent effect was observed, explainable by the dissociation of the catalyst from the support upon addition of strongly polar solvents. 

Table 21 shows solvent effects on the polymerization of phenylacetylene by the W(CO)6-based catalyst23. It is clear that halogen-containing solvents play an essential role in the formation of the active species. Among them, CO allows the highest polymer yield. Since catalytic amounts of CC14 have proved to be insufficient, it is most favorable to use CC14 as solvent for the polymerization by metal hexa-carbonyls. (Refer to Eq. (15) for the reaction mechanism.)... 

Though ionic polymerization resembles free-radical polymerization in terms of initiation, propagation, transfer, and termination reactions, the kinetics of ionic polymerizations are significantly diflFerent from free-radical polymerizations. In sharp contrast to free-radical polymerizations, the initiation reactions in ionic polymerizations have very low activation energies, chain termination by mutual destruction of growing species is nonexistent, and solvent effects are much more pronounced, as the nature of solvent determines whether the chain centers are ion pairs, free ions, or both. No such solvent role is encountered in free-radical polymerization. The overall result of these features is to make the kinetics of ionic polymerization much more complex than the kinetics of free-radical polymerization. 

It has been suggested that trialkylborane initiators form a complex with the radical end95. This has been shown by comparing the activation parameters for the tri-n-butylborane-initiated polymerization of vinyl trimethylacetate and of vinyl tri-fluoroacetate in various solvents with those for the AIBN-initiated polymerization (Table 2). The difference of stereoregulating activation parameters between the initiators may be due to the solvent effect on the formation of a complex of trialkylborane with the radical end. 

---