Polymer solution-cast

S. Hui, T.K Chaki, S. Chattopadhyay, Effect of sihca-based nanofillers on the properties of a low-density polyethylene/ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer based thermoplastic elastomer. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 110 (2) (2008) pp. 825-836. https //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymer Solution Casting. 

Polymers in medicine.pdf, https //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymer solution casting. 

Solution Casting. The production of unsupported film and sheet by solution casting has generally passed from favor and is used only for special polymers not amenable to melt processes. The use of solvents was generally very hazardous because of their flammabiUty or toxic nature. The cost of recovery and disposal of solvents became prohibitive for many lower price film appHcations. The nature of the drying operations leads to problems with solvent migration and retention that are not problems with melt-processed polymers. 

Phase Inversion (Solution Precipitation). Phase inversion, also known as solution precipitation or polymer precipitation, is the most important asymmetric membrane preparation method. In this process, a clear polymer solution is precipitated into two phases a soHd polymer-rich phase that forms the matrix of the membrane, and a Hquid polymer-poor phase that forms the membrane pores. If precipitation is rapid, the pore-forming Hquid droplets tend to be small and the membranes formed are markedly asymmetric. If precipitation is slow, the pore-forming Hquid droplets tend to agglomerate while the casting solution is stiU fluid, so that the final pores are relatively large and the membrane stmcture is more symmetrical. Polymer precipitation from a solution can be achieved in several ways, such as cooling, solvent evaporation, precipitation by immersion in water, or imbibition of... 

A schematic diagram of the polymer precipitation process is shown in Figure 8. The hot polymer solution is cast onto a water-cooled chill roU, which cools the solution, causing the polymer to precipitate. The precipitated film is passed through an extraction tank containing methanol, ethanol or 2-propanol to remove the solvent. Finally, the membrane is dried, sent to a laser inspection station, trimmed, and roUed up. The process shown in Figure 8... 

Most solution-cast composite membranes are prepared by a technique pioneered at UOP (35). In this technique, a polymer solution is cast directly onto the microporous support film. The support film must be clean, defect-free, and very finely microporous, to prevent penetration of the coating solution into the pores. If these conditions are met, the support can be coated with a Hquid layer 50—100 p.m thick, which after evaporation leaves a thin permselective film, 0.5—2 pm thick. This technique was used to form the Monsanto Prism gas separation membranes (6) and at Membrane Technology and Research to form pervaporation and organic vapor—air separation membranes (36,37) (Fig. 16). 

The first five of these techniques involve deformation and this has to be followed by some setting operation which stabilises the new shape. In the case of polymer melt deformation this can be affected by cooling of thermoplastics and cross-linking of thermosetting plastics and similtir comments can apply to deformation in the rubbery state. Solution-cast film and fibre requires solvent evaporation (with also perhaps some chemical coagulation process). Latex suspensions can simply be dried as with emulsion paints or subjected to some... 

The release of steroids such as progesterone from films of PCL and its copolymers with lactic acid has been shown to be rapid (Fig. 10) and to exhibit the expected (time)l/2 kinetics when corrected for the contribution of an aqueous boundary layer (68). The kinetics were consistent with phase separation of the steroid in the polymer and a Fickian diffusion process. The release rates, reflecting the permeability coefficient, depended on the method of film preparation and were greater with compression molded films than solution cast films. In vivo release rates from films implanted in rabbits was very rapid, being essentially identical to the rate of excretion of a bolus injection of progesterone, i. e., the rate of excretion rather than the rate of release from the polymer was rate determining. 

Sample Preparation. Samples for mechanical studies were made by compression molding the polymers at 150°C between Teflon sheets for 15 minutes followed by rapid quenching to room temperature in air. These will be referred to as PQ (press-quenched or simply quenched) samples. The thickness of the PQ samples was around 10 mils (0.25 mm). The thermal history of all of the PQ samples (HBIB, HIBI, and LDPE) were essentially the same. They were used within one week after they were pressed. Samples for morphology, SALS and SEM studies were prepared from toluene solutions. These films were cast on a Teflon sheet at 80 C from a 1% (by weight) solution in toluene. These films were about 5 mils in thickness. When the polymer films had solidified (after 5 hrs), they were stored in a vacuum oven at 80°C for two days to remove residual solvent. These samples will be designated by TOL (solution cast from toluene). 

SEM micrographs of two members of these polymers (HB and HBIB-50) are shown in Figure 7 to provide further evidence for superstructure on the micron level within the solution cast films. One can directly observe the surface of the spherulitic structure of the HB homopolymer as well as in that of the copolymer HBIB-50. Clearly, the level of structure (-5 pm) is well above that of the individual domains of either HB or HI and reflects the possible primary nucleation and subsequent growth behavior common to spherulitic semicrystalline polymers. The Hv patterns shown in... 

---