Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Polymer brushes ATRP initiator

Hoven et al. [34] used a chemically grafted tris(trimethylsiloxy)silyl (tris(TMS)) monolayer on a silicon oxide substrate as a template for creating nanoclusters of polymer brushes. Surface-initiated polymerization of 2-meth-acryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MFC) and tert-butyl methacrylate (t-BMA) was used to generate polymer brushes via ATRP from a-bromoester groups tethered to the residual silanol groups on the silicon surface, as... [Pg.17]

The very small number of growing polymer chains, when compared to the monomer concentration results in a very low overall concentration of free control agent and leads to inefficient capping of chain ends. One solution to this problem is the addition of a free or unbound control agent to the polymerization medium. This can take the form of a low molecular weight alkoxyamine, ATRP initiator, RAFT agent or, alternatively, free deactivator such as nitroxide or Cu(II). This species is often called a sacrificial agent. This solution also leads to the formation of free polymer that must ultimately be removed from the brush. [Pg.562]

The chain architecture and chemical structure could be modified by SCVCP leading to a facile, one-pot synthesis of surface-grafted branched polymers. The copolymerization gave an intermediate surface topography and film thickness between the polymer protrusions obtained from SCVP of an AB inimer and the polymer brushes obtained by ATRP of a conventional monomer. The difference in the Br content at the surface between hyperbranched, branched, and linear polymers was confirmed by XPS, suggesting the feasibility to control the surface chemical functionality. The principal result of the works is a demonstration of utility of the surface-initiated SCVP via ATRP to prepare surface-grafted hyperbranched and branched polymers with characteristic architecture and topography. [Pg.28]

While in most of the reports on SIP free radical polymerization is utihzed, the restricted synthetic possibihties and lack of control of the polymerization in terms of the achievable variation of the polymer brush architecture limited its use. The alternatives for the preparation of weU-defined brush systems were hving ionic polymerizations. Recently, controlled radical polymerization techniques has been developed and almost immediately apphed in SIP to prepare stracturally weU-de-fined brush systems. This includes living radical polymerization using nitroxide species such as 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidin-l-oxyl (TEMPO) [285], reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization mainly utilizing dithio-carbamates as iniferters (iniferter describes a molecule that functions as an initiator, chain transfer agent and terminator during polymerization) [286], as well as atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) were the free radical is formed by a reversible reduction-oxidation process of added metal complexes [287]. All techniques rely on the principle to drastically reduce the number of free radicals by the formation of a dormant species in equilibrium to an active free radical. By this the characteristic side reactions of free radicals are effectively suppressed. [Pg.423]

SIP-driven polymer brush library fabrication leverages the fact that the polymerization initiation species are permanently bound to the substrate. Since the initiators are tethered, controlled delivery of monomer solution to different areas of the substrate results in a grafted polymer library. In NIST work, initiators bound via chlorosilane SAMs to silicon substrates were suitable for conducting controlled atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) [53] and traditional UV free radical polymerization [54, 55]. Suitable monomers are delivered in solution to the surface via microfluidic channels, which enables control over both the monomer solution composition and the time in which the solution is in contact with the initiating groups. After the polymerization is complete, the microchannel is removed from the substrate (or vice versa). This fabrication scheme, termed microchannel confined SIP ([t-SIP), is shown in Fig. 10. In these illustrations, and in the examples discussed below, the microchannels above the substrate are approximately 1 cm wide, 5 cm long, and 300-500 [tm high. [Pg.77]

Surface-initiated ATRP was applied not only on planer substrates but also on various kinds of flne particles. The latter systems will be reviewed separately in Sect. 5.1. Porous materials are also fascinating targets for chromatographic application making use of the unique structure and properties of high-density polymer brushes. Wirth et al. were the first to report the grafting of poly(acrylamide) (PAAm) on a porous silica gel [109,110]. [Pg.11]

This section reviews studies on the synthesis of fine particles coated with polymer brushes by surface-initiated ATRP. SiP are among the most extensively studied particles for the application of surface-initiated ATRP [85-93]. Patten et al. first succeeded in the surface-initiated ATRP of ST and MMA on two SiPs with average diameters of 75 and 300 nm [85,86]. Several groups investigated the synthesis of hybrid SiP with different monomers. Maty-jaszewski et al. synthesized an initiator-functionalized SiP with a diameter of... [Pg.34]

Owing to the simphcity and versatility of surface-initiated ATRP, the above-mentioned AuNP work may be extended to other particles for their two- or three-dimensionally ordered assemblies with a wide controllabiUty of lattice parameters. In fact, a dispersion of monodisperse SiPs coated with high-density PMMA brushes showed an iridescent color, in organic solvents (e.g., toluene), suggesting the formation of a colloidal crystal [108]. To clarify this phenomenon, the direct observation of the concentrated dispersion of a rhodamine-labeled SiP coated with a high-density polymer brush was carried out by confocal laser scanning microscopy. As shown in Fig. 23, the experiment revealed that the hybrid particles formed a wide range of three-dimensional array with a periodic structure. This will open up a new route to the fabrication of colloidal crystals. [Pg.38]

Polymer brushes are polymers tethered to a surface via one end. The connection to the surface can be covalent or non-covalent, and the brushes can be made via grafting to or grafting from the surface. In the past few years, there has been considerable interest in the growth of polymer brushes via surface-initiated polymerisations from (patterned) initiator-functionalised SAMs.62,63 For example, we have recently shown that surface confined Atom Transfer Radical Polymerisations (ATRP) in aqueous solvents leads to rapid and controlled... [Pg.36]

Thermally responsive polymers, such as poly( V-isopropyl acrylamide) (NI-PAm), have also been studied extensively for applications related to those previously discussed [112], De las Heras et al. described the synthesis and patterning of NIPAm brushes on SAMs and their subsequent performance during temperature-dependent adhesion assays of BSA and Streptococcus mutans (Fig. 7). The authors employed p.CP to pattern features of hydrophobic hexadecanethiol and backfilled the surface with an initiator-functionalized alkanethiol. Polymer brushes were grown via surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). FITC-BSA was then... [Pg.115]

On inert polymer substrates, additional preparation steps are required to enable initiator immobilization. For instance, the surface of PDMS stamps was oxidized with oxygen plasma, turning the Si-CHs groups into Si-OH groups [6]. On these hydroxyl groups, a trichlorosilane ATRP initiator was attached. Aqueous ATRP of 2-(methacryloyloxy)-ethyl trimethylammonium chloride (METAC) yielded a strong cationic polyelectrolyte brush, which was used to selectively transfer perchlorate anions to flat PMETAC-covered surfaces. As a result, chloride anions were locally replaced by perchlorate anions on the flat surface, and the swellability of the polymer brush was selectively changed. [Pg.47]


See other pages where Polymer brushes ATRP initiator is mentioned: [Pg.267]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.562]    [Pg.625]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.562]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.24]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.11 ]




SEARCH



Polymer brushes

© 2024 chempedia.info