Polyblends, miscibility

To understand the mechanism of polyblending, experiments have been carried out with polymeric solution. W. Borchard and G. Rehage mixed two partially miscible polymer solutions, measured the temperature dependence of the viscosity, and determined the critical point of precipitation. When two incompatible polymers, dissolved in a common solvent, are intimately mixed, a polymeric oil-in-oil emulsion is formed. Droplet size of the dispersed phase and its surface chemistry, along with viscosity of the continuous phase, determine the stability of the emulsion. Droplet deformation arising from agitation has been measured on a dispersion of a polyurethane solution with a polyacrylonitrile solution by H. L. Doppert and W. S. Overdiep, who calculated the relationship between viscosity and composition. 

The basic issue confronting the designer of polymer blend systems is how to guarantee good stress transfer between the components of the multicomponent system. Only in this way can the component s physical properties be efficiently used to give blends with the desired properties. One approach is to find blend systems that form miscible amorphous phases. In polyblends of this type, the various components have the thermodynamic potential for being mixed at the molecular level and the interactions between unlike components are quite strong. Since these systems form only one miscible amorphous phase, interphase stress transfer is not an issue and the physical properties of miscible blends approach and frequently exceed those expected for a random copolymer comprised of the same chemical constituents. 

Additional types of hyperfiltration membranes produced by CARRE, Inc. Include polyblend membranes prepared by the deposition of pairs of polymers that form miscible blends ( 5). High rejection of molecular solute species in the molecular weight range above about 80 is obtainable with these dynamic polyblend membranes. 

Enhanced interphase interactions, deduced from thermal and dynamic mechanical properties and morphology observed by SEM, demonstrate the efficient compatibilizing effect of iPS-fo-iPP copolymer on iPS-iPP blends. Each sequence of the iPS-fc-iPP diblock copolymer can probably penetrate or easily anchor its homopolymer phase and provide important entanglements, improving the miscibility and interaction between the iPS and iPP phases. This is in good agreement with what is inferred from the mechanical properties of the iPS-fo-iPP-iPS-iPP polyblends. 

Elastomers with similar polarities and solubility characteristics can be easily combined to produce miscible polyblend (18). Miscible polymer blend is a polymer blend, which is homogeneous down to the molecular level and associated with the negative value of the free energy of mixing and the domain size is comparable to the dimensions of the macromolecular statistical segment. Complete miscibility in a mixture of two polymers requires that the following condition be fulfilled (19) ... 

The first commercial blend of two dissimilar polymers was Noryl, a miscible polyblend of poly(phenylene oxide) and polystyrene, introduced by General Electric in the 1960s. Since that time a large number of different blends have been introduced. A number of technologies have been devised to prepare polyblends these are summarized in Table 4.34. For economic reasons, however, mechanical blending predominates. 

It so happens that most polymers are not miscible rather they separate into discrete phases on being mixed. Differences between miscible and immisdble polyblends are manifested in appearance (miscible blends are usually clear, immiscible blends are opaque) and in such properties as glass transition temperature (miscible blends exhibit a single Tg intermediate between those of the individual components, whereas immiscible blends exhibit separate TgS characteristic of each component). 

When the polymer components in a blend are less miscible, phase separation will form larger domains with weaker interfacial bonding between them. The interfaces will therefore fail under stress and properties of polyblends are thus likely to be poorer than for either of the polymers in the blend. U-shaped property curves (Figure 4.40c) thus provide a strong indication of immiscibility. In most cases they also signify practical incompatibility, and hence lack of practical utility. 

A major problem in polyblend development is trying to predict polymer miscibility. The incompatibility of various pairs of polymers has been correlated with the mutual effects on intrinsic viscosities and dipole moment differences of the component polymers [67,68]. These results can give a guide for finding compatible polymer or polymer pairs or with very low incompatibility. 

This chapter lays the groundwork for the various topics discussed in subsequent chapters. The mathematics associated with the statistics of the isolated chain are developed starting with the bonding and structure found in small molecules. Several models of chain structure are presented. Finally, the size distribution of polymer chains is introduced and their description in terms of mathematical equations derived, origin of rubber elasticity, the nature of polymer crystalline and polymeric heat capacities and the miscibility of polyblends. 

Equation-5, X and Phi denote the molar and volume fiaetion of the components, respectively. Eor two polymers to be miscible, the free energy of mixing must be negative. If the solubility parameters of the polymer pairs are too far apart, the free energy of mixing becomes positive, and compatibilizers are often needed to reduce the interfacial tension between incompatible components in a blend. In industry, both miscible and immiscible polyblends are important materials because they fill (filFerent market needs. 

Flory and Ronca[126,127] predicted that asymmetric molecules with aspect ratios higher than 6.417 can act as a mesogett and mesogens with different aspect ratios also form liquid crystals. According to the theoretical predictions, an anisotropic solittion of single phase composed of polymeric mesogens with different aspect ratios is prepared, which was experimentally verified[128,129]. The theoretical predictions further suggest that miscible mesomorphic polyblends may be prepared. Takayanaki et a/.[56,130] exantined the phase transition of... 

As a polyester, PHB can partake in many of the hydrogen-bonding type of specific interactions with other functional additives that lead to partial miscibility and compatibility. For example, the miscibility of polyesters with chlorinated polymers, polyamides, polycarbonates, cellulose derivatives and other functional polymers is well documented,and PHB is no exception to this general observation. However, these interactions are dominated by the tendency to self-crystallize with exclusion of the additive to the amorphous phase. For example, an 80/20 melt compounded and injection-moulded sample of PVC/PHB polyblend appears initially to be exceptionally tough with the PHB acting as a polymeric plasticizer. The presence of the PVC retards but does not stop crystallization of the PHB at room temperature and the material eventually becomes brittle. Under extreme circumstances, the PHB phase can actually achieve almost 100% crystallinity within the blend, as determined by X-ray analysis and DSC. Thus, plasticized formulations and polyblends involving PHB itself are limited to relatively low levels of additive because only the minor amorphous phase of the biopolymer is involved in the interaction. Even so, some plasticizers have been proposed for PHB. ... 

Miscibility in Polyblends Polymers are miscible if they form a single phase. Usually the components in a polymer blend are not miscible unless there is an attractive interaction between groups on two or more polymer chains. The most widely used technique to determine miscibility uses the measurement of the glass transition. The observation of a single glass transition with Tg somewhere between the Tg values of the individual component polymers is an indication of a miscible system. Conversely, a nonmisdble... 

Polyolefins containing carboxylic acid groups, sometimes neutralized to form ionomers, form much stronger intermolecular hydrogen bonding and ionic attractions than simple polyolefins, and can thus contribute greatly to practical compatibility or even molecular miscibility of polyblends, particularly blends with more polar polymers. Occasionally sulfonated polyolefins offer similar benefits. Carboxylation of polyolefins has been noted occasionally throughout this survey. In the current section the emphasis is on carboxylic and sulfonic acid copolymers and their ionomers. 

These are mentioned occasionally in the polyblend literature. For example, when ethylene/methyl acrylate copolymer was blended with polybutylene terephthalate, maleating the copolymer improved interfacial adhesion and impact strength [208]. Blends of ethy-lene thyl acrylate copolymers with PE are mentioned as commercial thermoplastic elastomers [24]. Ethylene copolymers with ethyl acrylate and carbon monoxide, with acrylonitrile, and with dimethyl acrylamide all provided strong hydrogen bonding, producing miscibility... 

These generally gave two-phase blends with PIB and butyl rubber. Properties vs polyblend ratio usually indicated that these phases were partially miscible solid solutions [77]. Crosslinked phases increased stability of morphology and properties [26]. Intensive studies of HDPE -I- Butyl blends gave bimodal peaks for melt viscosity and ultimate elongation vs blend ratio, which were explained by two continuous laminar/fibrillar phases [188]. 

Addition of a physical compatibilizer is obviously the simplest and most straightforward technique for the average plastics processor. However, the compatibilizer must be matched to the polymers in the blend, with segments either identical to the base polymers, or else similar, miscible, or at least compatible with them. Such tailor-made compatibilizers are rarely available commercially, and when they are, they are usually speciality materials, made in small volume and quite expensive. For many polyblend systems, they do not exist at all, and require considerable research and custom synthesis, which are very expensive. 

The miscible polyblends are eharacterized by a single glass transition temperature (7 ), whieh depends on the relative weight fractions of components and their respeetive Tg values. 

---