Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Polarity parameter, calculation

Values for several other solvents given. and <7 — n polarization parameters calculated. [Pg.498]

It should be born in mind, however, that the activation parameters calculated refer to the sum of several reactions, whose enthalpy and/or entropy changes may have different signs from those of the decrystalUzation proper. Specifically, the contribution to the activation parameters of the interactions that occur in the solvent system should be taken into account. Consider the energetics of association of the solvated ions with the AGU. We may employ the extra-thermodynamic quantities of transfer of single ions from aprotic to protic solvents as a model for the reaction under consideration. This use is appropriate because recent measurements (using solvatochromic indicators) have indicated that the polarity at the surface of cellulose is akin to that of aliphatic alcohols [99]. Single-ion enthalpies of transfer indicate that Li+ is more efficiently solvated by DMAc than by alcohols, hence by cellulose. That is, the equilibrium shown in Eq. 7 is endothermic ... [Pg.123]

The changes AS are negative, corresponding to increased stability, and are given in units of j8q each diagram corresponds to four calculations (8a, r = 3,5,6,8), and shows how, as Sa, the polarization parameter increases, positions 8 and 5 overtake 3 as the active positions. The results show that discrepancies between theoretical predictions and... [Pg.84]

For such situations we have developed a different approach. The parameters calculated by our methods are taken as coordinates in a space, the reactivity space, A bond of a molecule is represented in such a space as a specific point, having characteristic values for the parameters taken as coordinates. Figure 6 shows a three-dimensional reactivity space spanned by bond polarity, bond dissociation energy, and the value for the resonance effect as coordinates. [Pg.266]

A modification of the atomic approach was also proposed by Gaillard et al. using molecular lipophilicity potential (MLP) as a 3D source of two lipophilicity parameters calculated from the water-accessible surface, namely a hydrophobic parameter expressed as the sum ofthe positive lipophilicity potential (EM LP+) and a polar parameter expressed as the sum of the negative lipophilicity potential (EMLP—)... [Pg.95]

Within the framework of the bond polarization the shift components of the unpolarized bond and the parameter Aai giving the polarization influence on the chemical shift are determined empirically from solving a set of linear equations 1 for a number of substances where both the chemical shift tensor and the molecular structure are known. The bond polarization energies Vai are calculated as effect of surrounding net atomic charges qx on atomic hybrids %. With the bond polarity parameter the polarization energy can be calculated. [Pg.94]

The origin of equations 1 and 2 was explained in more detail in (6). The calibration of the bond polarization parameters for, 3C chemical shift tensors for C(sp3/sp2)-C, C(sp3/sp2)-H, C(sp3/sp2)-0, and C(sp3)-N o-bonds as well as C(sp2)-C and C(sp2)-0 71-bonds was described in detail in (5). Structural data and tensorial single crystal, 3C NMR data of 20 crystalline substances including sugars, polycyclic aromatic compounds, and amino acids were used in this calculation. [Pg.94]

In spite of claims to the contrary, to date no completely satisfactory method exists to calculate the polarity / polarizability parameter, n, as it applies to the equilibrium of solute between water and octanol. The excess molar refractivity of the solute (compared to an alkane of equal size) can be estimated separately from polarizability/dipolarity (Abraham, 1994) and seems an attractive approach to this problem, but it needs further verification. The dipole moment of the entire molecule has been used as a polarity parameter (Bodor, 1992), but there are good reasons to believe it has marginal value at best. The square of the dipole moment also has been used (Leahy, 1992), and it, at least, has some theoretical basis (Kirkwood, 1934). [Pg.112]

Figure 5.21 Spin-polarization parameters a, A, and tj as functions of the photon wavelength in the continuous range for photoelectrons leaving the xenon ion in the 5p5 2P1/2 and 2P3/2 states, respectively. The J value of the final state is indicated on the curves the vertical dashed line shows the J = 1/2 ionization threshold. Experimental data full circles [HSS86], Theoretical data full curves, relativistic random-phase calculation [HJC81] dashed curves non-relativistic random-phase calculation [Che79], From [HSS86] note /[HSS86] = 0.5 rj. Figure 5.21 Spin-polarization parameters a, A, and tj as functions of the photon wavelength in the continuous range for photoelectrons leaving the xenon ion in the 5p5 2P1/2 and 2P3/2 states, respectively. The J value of the final state is indicated on the curves the vertical dashed line shows the J = 1/2 ionization threshold. Experimental data full circles [HSS86], Theoretical data full curves, relativistic random-phase calculation [HJC81] dashed curves non-relativistic random-phase calculation [Che79], From [HSS86] note /[HSS86] = 0.5 rj.
The important question of the stability of the perturbation expansion to changes in hybridization and the bond polarity parameter is discussed by Jordan et a/.152 The method has been extended to radicals with a well localized odd electron153 and to some excited states.154 A similar ab initio treatment has been developed but can only be applied to small molecules.155 In a paper dealing with calculation of n.m.r. coupling constants, Dennis and Malrieu make some use of INDO terms rather than CNDO.156 A complete derivation of the PCILO equations using diagramatic techniques has been given recently by Kvasnicka.157... [Pg.198]

The carbon and hydrogen analyses, VPO molecular weights, and NMR results were used to calculate average molecular parameters for the >diaromatics and polar aromatics obtained from both the reduced crude and slurry oils. The average molecular parameters were calculated by the method of Williams,(5)(6) Typical results of the average molecular parameter calculations for >diaromatic and polar aromatic chromatographic fractions obtained from both the reduced crude and slurry oils are given in Tables II and III,... [Pg.116]

The aforementioned macroscopic physical constants of solvents have usually been determined experimentally. However, various attempts have been made to calculate bulk properties of Hquids from pure theory. By means of quantum chemical methods, it is possible to calculate some thermodynamic properties e.g. molar heat capacities and viscosities) of simple molecular Hquids without specific solvent/solvent interactions [207]. A quantitative structure-property relationship treatment of normal boiling points, using the so-called CODESS A technique i.e. comprehensive descriptors for structural and statistical analysis), leads to a four-parameter equation with physically significant molecular descriptors, allowing rather accurate predictions of the normal boiling points of structurally diverse organic liquids [208]. Based solely on the molecular structure of solvent molecules, a non-empirical solvent polarity index, called the first-order valence molecular connectivity index, has been proposed [137]. These purely calculated solvent polarity parameters correlate fairly well with some corresponding physical properties of the solvents [137]. [Pg.69]

If X—H B vibrations are being examined, v refers to its gas-phase value. The value for fl is a measure of solvent susceptibihty of a particular IR vibration, and G is a function of the solvent only. Since solvent shifts of vc-o and vs-o are proportional to solvent shifts of vx-h b, G values are calculated from the solvent shifts of the carbonyl bands of A,iV-dimethyIformamide and benzophenone and the sulfonyl band of dimethyl sulfoxide. An arbitrary value of 100 was assigned to dichloromethane to fix the scale [G = 0 for the gas phase) [85]. Values of G are given in Table 7-2. Further G values have been determined by Somolinos et al. [240] and their relationships to other solvent polarity parameters have been investigated [241]. [Pg.435]

I = 21 y = 0.394 r = 0.9476 F = 49.8 where log P is the hydrophobicity, bondrefr is the molecular refractivity, delta is the submolecular polarity parameter, ind indicator variable (0 for heterocyclics and 1 for benzene derivatives). Calculations indicated that PBD-coated alumina behaves as an RP stationary phase, the bulkiness and the polarity of the solute significantly influencing the retention. The separation efficiency of PBD-coated alumina was compared with those of other stationary phases for the analysis of Catharanthus alkaloids. It was established that the pH of the mobile phase, the concentration and type of the organic modifier, and the presence of salt simultaneously influence the retention. In this special case, the efficiency of PBD-coated alumina was inferior to that of ODS. The retention characteristics of polyethylene-coated alumina (PE-Alu) have been studied in detail using various nonionic surfactants as model compounds.It was found that PE-Alu behaves as an RP stationary phase and separates the surfactants according to the character of the hydrophobic moiety. The relationship between the physicochemical descriptors of 25 aromatic solutes and their retention on PE-coated silica (PE-Si) and PE-Alu was elucidated by stepwise regression analysis. [Pg.121]

The retention of polar compounds (mono-, di-, and tri-substituted benzenes) on PGC, silica-based, and apolar copolymer supports was performed using unbuffered methanol water as eluent. The relationship between log k and the volume fraction of methanol was calculated separately for each solute. It was found that porous graphitic carbon retains polar compounds fairly well under reversed-phase conditions, while the retention factor increased with an increase in the number of polar substituents. In particular, the retention behavior of polar solutes on PGC supports is mainly governed by several polarity parameters (Hammett s constant, proton-donor capacity, and steric effects of substituents) and is quite different from that observed with other reversed-phase supports. Thus it was concluded that charge-induced interactions between the graphite surface as well as steric... [Pg.1248]

The polarity parameter for ground state HF is then calculated to be ... [Pg.66]

There are five adjustable parameters per molecule X, the dispersion parameter q, the induction parameter x, the polarity parameter a, the hydrogen-bond acidity parameter and p, the hydrogen-bond basicity parameter. The induction parameter q often is set to a value of 1.0, yielding a four-parameter mcdel. The terms fi and are asymmetry factors calculated from the other parameters. A database of parameter values for 150 compounds, determined by regression of phase equilibrium data, is given by Lazzaroni et al. [Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 44(11), pp. 4075-4083 (2005)]. An application of MOSCED in the study of liquid-liquid extraction is described by Escudero, Cabezas, and Coca [Chem. Eng. Comm., 173, pp. 135—146 (1999)]. Also see Frank et al., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 46, pp. 4621-4625 (2007). [Pg.1720]

The plots suggested by Equation 3 for these systems are shewn in Figures 2, 3 and 4 and these show that the excellent correlation found with polymers is not obeyed with these compounds. The results arising from alkane probes show linearity, even with polar molecules such as NMP, but there are marked deviations with aromatic or polar probes. Table III shows the solubility parameters calculated using solely the linear portions of the graphs obtained with the alkane probes, and also using the results from all of the probes. The results do not show the consistency displayed by polymers, and the estimates of 62 differ greatly from literature values. There is no apparent pattern as to whether better results are found from the alkane solvents or from all of the results. [Pg.52]

The density of phosgene vapour under standard reference conditions was measured to be 4.526 [742] or 4.525 kg m 3 [1281]. Using the value of the standard molar volume, Vnj j, the density of the gas at 0 C and atmospheric pressure was calculated to be 4.413 kg m 3 Phosgene vapour is thus, unexpectedly, far removed from ideality. An attempt has been made to generalize the Benedict-Wee-Rubin equation of state using three polar parameters as part of a study of a large series of polar substances, which includes COClj as one of the examples [1518]. [Pg.281]

Figure 5 shows the calculated optical absorption spectrum, obtained from an analysis of the dipole matrix elements of Fe8Br62+. The two projections correspond to two most different polarization axes which have been determined by diagonalizing the bare polarizability tensor. The calculated and experimental electronic structures were found to be relatively good agreement. Despite this fact the anisotropy parameters calculated for this molecule seem to overestimate the experimental results by about a factor of two. [Pg.102]


See other pages where Polarity parameter, calculation is mentioned: [Pg.436]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.499]    [Pg.818]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.432]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.2628]    [Pg.2633]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.447]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.344 ]




SEARCH



Parameter calculation

Polarity parameter

Polarization parameters

Polarization, calculation

© 2024 chempedia.info