Physical treatment methods

The following technologies are among the most commonly used physical methods of purifying water  

Physical methods for treating natural fibers before biocomposite processing involve electrical discharges such as cold plasma and corona, electron beam irradiation, ultraviolet (UV) treatment, and ultrasonic treatment,. Such physical approaches are of great interest because, in general, the processes are dry, clean, labor-friendly, environment-friendly, and fast in comparison with most of the chemical methods, which are wet processes. Under appropriate treatment conditions, they can effectively modify structural and surface characteristics of natural fibers, thereby improving the mechanical and thermal properties of biocomposites as well as enhancing the interfacial adhesion between the natural fibers and the polymer matrix. 

---

The aerobic biodegradation of isophorone has been studied using sludge and wastewater inocula as well as combined biological and physical treatment methods. Isophorone appears to biodegrade... 

Another thing is what you just mentioned, that many contaminants are not analyzed according to standardized analytical procedures. That is one of the biggest problems, of course. For water treatment methods, we do not prefer the chemical treatment methods but the physical treatment methods. Thus, we are trying to remove things and not to introduce things. This is important. That is our philosophy. 

Other fruit juices can also be used as sweeteners after undergoing physical treatment methods to neutralise and decolourise them. Such fruit concentrates are used as alternatives to natural fruit sugar. 

Coagulation-Precipitation The nature of an industrial wastewater is often such that conventional physical treatment methods will not provide an adequate level of treatment. Particularly, ordinary settling or flotation processes will not remove ultrafine colloidal particles and metal ions. In these instances, natural stabilizing forces (such as electrostatic repulsion and physical separation) predominate over the natural aggregating forces and mechanisms, namely, van der Waals forces and Brownian motion, which tend to cause particle contact. Therefore, to adequately treat such particles in industrial wastewaters, coagulation-precipitation may be warranted. 

The second type of surface treatment is in principle an improving of the chemical reactivity of the substrates by chemical or physical treatment methods. All the systems known lead to oxidizing effects of the nonpolar substrate and create carbonyl, carboxyl and hydroxyl groups at the surface which are polar and partly chemically reactive. The existence of these groups can be measured for example by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy using the attenuated total reflexion (ATR) technique. 

Physical treatment methods are too expensive, not sufficiently effective, or have not become established for other technical reasons. However, UV treatment of the mix water could be a useful measure for reducing microbial invasion. 

When viewing effluent treatment methods, it is clear that the basic problem of disposing of waste material safety is, in many cases, not so much solved but moved from one place to another. The fundamental problem is that once waste has been created, it cannot be destroyed. The waste can be concentrated or diluted, its physical or chemical form can be changed, but it cannot be destroyed. 

Furthermore, molecular analysis is absolutely necessary for the petroleum industry in order to interpret the chemical processes being used and to evaluate the efficiency of treatments whether they be thermal or catalytic. This chapter will therefore present physical analytical methods used in the molecular characterization of petroleum. 

The physical state of a pollutant is obviously important a particulate coUector cannot remove vapor. Pollutant concentration and carrier gas quantity ate necessary to estimate coUector si2e and requited efficiency and knowledge of a poUutant s chemistry may suggest alternative approaches to treatment. Emission standards may set coUection efficiency, but specific regulations do not exist for many trace emissions. In such cases emission targets must be set by dose—exposure time relationships obtained from effects on vegetation, animals, and humans. With such information, a Ust of possible treatment methods can be made (see Table 1). 

J. F. Kreissl and J. J. Westrick, "Municipal Waste Treatment by Physical—Chemical Methods," Prog Water Technol 1, 1 (1972). 

The treatment of waste is the third element of the hierarchy and should be utilized only in the absence of feasible source reduction or recychng opportunities. Waste treatment involves the use of chemical, biological, or physical processes to reduce or eliminate waste material. The incineration of wastes is included in this categoiy and is considered preferable to other treatment methods (i.e., chemical, biological, and physical) because incineration can permanently destroy the hazardous components in waste materials (Ref. 4). It can also be employed to reduce the volume of waste to be treated. 

Calculate the mass or weight of chemical in the wastestream being treated by multiplying the concentration (by weight) of the chemical in the wastestream by the flow rate. In most cases, the percent removal compares the treated effluent to the influent for the particular type of wastestream. However, for some treatment methods, such as Incineration or solidification of wastewater, the percent removal of the chemical from the influent wastestream would be reported as 100 percent because the wastestream does not exist in a comparable form after treatment. Some of the treatments (e.g., fuel blending and evaporation) do not destroy, chemically convert, or physically remove the chemical from its wastestream. For these treatment methods, an efficiency of zero must be reported. 

For metal compounds, the calculation of the reportable concentration and treatment efficiency is based on the weight ot the parent metal, not on the weight of the metal compounds Metals are not destroyed, only physically removed or chemically converted from one form into another. The treatment efficiency reported represents only physical removal of the parent metal from the wastestream, not the percent chemical conversion of the metal compound. If a listed treatment method converts but does not remove a metal (e.g., chromium reduction), the method must be reported, but the treatment efficiency must be reported as zero. 

In applying these general criteria, one should focus on the intended application. In wastewater treatment applications, filtration can be applied at various stages. It can be applied as a pretreatment method, in which case the objective is often to remove coarse, gritty materials from the waste-stream. This is a preconditioning step for waste waters which will undergo further chemical and physical treatment downstream. 

The modern electronic industry has played a very important role in the development of instrumentation based on physical-analytical methods As a result, a rapid boom in the fields of infrared, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), Raman, and mass spectroscopy and vapor-phase (or gas-liquid) chromatography has been observed. Instruments for these methods have become indispensable tools in the analytical treatment of fluonnated mixtures, complexes, and compounds The detailed applications of the instrumentation are covered later in this chapter. 

Reinforcing fibers can be modified by physical and chemical methods. Physical methods, such as stretching [22], calandering [23,24], thermotreatment [25], and the production of hybrid yarns [26,27] do not change the chemical composition of the fibers. Physical treatments change structural and surface properties of the fiber and thereby influence the mechanical bondings in the matrix. 

Electric discharge (corona, cold plasma) is another method of physical treatment. Corona treatment is one of the most interesting techniques for surface oxidation activation. This process changes the surface energy of the cellulose fibers [28]. In the case of wood surface activation it increases the amount of aldehyde groups [291. 

The mechanical properties of composites are mainly influenced by the adhesion between matrix and fibers of the composite. As it is known from glass fibers, the adhesion properties could be changed by pretreatments of fibers. So special process, chemical and physical modification methods were developed. Moisture repel-lency, resistance to environmental effects, and, not at least, the mechanical properties are improved by these treatments. Various applications for natural fibers as reinforcement in plastics are encouraged. 

Formation from Template Surfaces Recently, a new method for the preparation of LUV was reported by Lasic et al. (1988). The method is based on a simple procedure which leads to the formation of homogeneous populations of LUV with a diameter of around L vim. Upon addition of solvent to a dry phospholipid film deposited on a template surface, vesicles are formed instantly without any chemical or physical treatment. The formation of multilamellar structures is prevented by inducing a surface charge on the bilayers. The size of the vesicles is controlled by the topography of the template surface on which the phospholipid film was deposited (Lasic, 1988). 

The use of chemicals, essentially acid, is the method of choice for the extraction of pectins, at least at an industrial level (3,4). Enzymes such as "protopectinases", polygalacturonases, rhamnogalacturonases, have been tentatively used at a laboratory scale but their industrial interest is still an open question (4,5,6). There are only some reports on the use physical treatment such as various heat treatments. 

The same methods (chemicals, enzymes, physical treatments) can be also applied on the cell wall materials not with the aim of extracting polysaccharides but with the aim of obtaining modified fibres. New properties concerning for exemple fermentability, ratio soluble/insoluble dietary fibre, hydration., can be obtained (1). 

However, the participants were not given treatment when they became available and were not informed that they were not given optimal treatment. African Americans aware of this study are less likely to participate in research (Shavers et al, 2000 Hamilton et al, 2006). Even African Americans unaware ofthe study often mistrust research that might involve physically intrusive methods (Hamilton etal, 2006). This mistrust applies to psychiatric research as well (Wendler etal, 2006). 

The specific purpose of this chapter is to describe the chemical and physical pretreatment methods required for nickel-chromium plating wastewater, to describe the upgrades needed by a municipal wastewater treatment system to manage this waste, and to relate the methods and upgrades to the operation of the total treatment system. Special emphasis is placed on presentation of the following ... 

Bioremediation offers several advantages over conventional methods of waste treatment such as landfilling or incineration. Bioremediation can be done on site, it is often less expensive, involves minimal site disruption, eliminates waste permanently, eliminates long-term liability, has greater public acceptance with regulatory encouragement, and can be coupled with other physical or chemical treatment methods. 

---