Physical minimum detectable level

Detector Sensitivity or the Minimum Detectable Concentration has been defined as the minimum concentration of an eluted solute that can be differentiated unambiguously from the noise. The ratio of the signal to the noise for a peak that is considered decisively identifiable has been arbitrarily chosen to be two. This ratio originated from electronic theory and has been transposed to LC. Nevertheless, the ratio is realistic and any peak having a signal to noise ratio of less than two is seriously obscured by the noise. Thus, the minimum detectable concentration is that concentration that provides a signal equivalent to twice the noise level. Unfortunately, the concentration that will provide a signal equivalent to twice the noise level will usually depend on the physical properties of the solute used for measurement. Consequently, the detector sensitivity, or minimum detectable concentration, must be quoted in conjunction with the solute that is used for measurement. 

Interfacing the TEA to both a gas and a HPLC has been shown to be selective to nitro-based explosives (NG, PETN, EGDN, 2,4-DNT, TNT, RDX and HMX) determined in real world samples, such as pieces of explosives, post-blast debris, post-blast air samples, hand swabs and human blood, at picogram level sensitivity [14], The minimum detectable amount for most explosives reported was 4-5 pg injected into column. A pyrolyser temperature of 550°C for HPLC-TEA and 900°C for GC/TEA was selected. As the authors pointed out, GC uses differences in vapour pressure and solubility in the liquid phase of the column to separate compounds, whereas in HPLC polarity, physical size and shape characteristics determine the chromatographic selectivity. So, the authors reported that the use of parallel HPLC-TEA and GC-TEA techniques provides a novel self-confirmatory capability, and because of the selectivity of the technique, there was no need for sample clean-up before analysis. The detector proved to be linear over six orders of magnitude. In the determination of explosives dissolved in acetone and diluted in methanol to obtain a 10-ppm (weight/volume) solution, the authors reported that no extraneous peaks were observed even when the samples were not previously cleaned up. Neither were they observed in the analysis of post-blast debris. Controlled experiments with handswabs spiked with known amounts of explosives indicated a lower detection limit of about 10 pg injected into column. 

Detector Response - (RJ - The detector response can be defined in two ways. Firstly, as the detector output per unit change in concentration e.g. volts/g/ml) or secondly, as the detector output per unit change of physical property being measured e.g. for the FID, volts/gram of carbon/ml). In conjunction with the detector noise level it allows the sensitivity or minimum detectable concentration to be... 

Unfortunately, the concentration that will provide a signal equivalent to twice the noise level will usually depend on the physical properties of the solute used for measurement. Consequently, the detector sensitivity, or minimum detectable concentration, is quoted in conjunction with the solute that is used for measurement. 

Odors are measured by their intensity. The threshold value of one odor to another, however, can vary greatly. Detection threshold is the minimum physical intensity necessary for detection by a subject where the person is not required to identify the stimulus, but just detect the existence of the stimulus. Accordingly, threshold deterrninations are used to evaluate the effectiveness of different treatments and to estabflsh the level of odor control necessary to make a product acceptable (8). Concentration can also produce different odors for the same matenal. For example, indole (qv) in low concentrations has the smell of jasmine and a low threshold of perception. In high concentrations, it has a strong odor of feces and CX-naphthyl amine as well as a considerably higher threshold of perception. 

The conventional assay systems (If include dilutions of 1 2 to 1 5, as part of the extraction. Hence, the levels of detection are limited. The use of minimum amounts of extractant coupled with the physical removal of solids can improve the limits of detection and measurement. 

Level 1 sampling provides a single set of samples acquired to represent the average composition of each stream. This sample set is separated, either in the field or in the laboratory, into solid, liquid, and gas-phase components. Each fraction is evaluated with survey techniques which define its basic physical, chemical, and biological characteristics. The survey methods selected are compatible with a very broad spectrum of materials and have sufficient sensitivity to ensure a high probability of detecting environmental problems. Analytical techniques and instrumentation have been kept as simple as possible in order to provide an effective level of information at minimum cost. Each individual piece of data developed adds a relevant point to the overall evaluation. Conversely, since the information from a given analysis is limited, all the tests must be performed to provide a valid assessment of the sample. 

---