Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Phosphating salt spray tests

Product Utilization. The principal appHcation for chromium phosphate coatings is as a paint base for painted aluminum extmsions and aluminum beverage can stock. In these appHcations, extremely demanding performance criteria are met by the chromium phosphate conversion coatings. As an example, the Architectural Aluminum Manufacturer s Association Voluntary Specification 605.2-92 requires humidity and salt spray testing for 3000 hours and allows only minimal incidence of paint failure after testing (26). [Pg.224]

The most widely used accelerated tests are based on salt spray, and are covered by several Government Specifications. BS 1391 1952 (recently withdrawn) gives details of a hand-atomiser salt-spray test which employs synthetic sea-water and also of a sulphur-dioxide corrosion test. A continuous salt-spray test is described in ASTM B 117-61 and BS AU 148 Part 2(1969). Phosphate coatings are occasionally tested by continuous salt spray without a sealing oil film and are expected to withstand one or two hours spray without showing signs of rust the value of such a test in cases where sealing is normally undertaken is extremely doubtful. [Pg.716]

The main value of salt-spray tests is in the evaluation of the effectiveness of phosphate coatings in restricting the spread of rust from scratches or other points of damage in a paint film. This feature is of particular interest to the motorcar industry, as vehicles are often exposed to marine atmospheres and to moisture and salt when the latter is used to disperse ice and frost from road surfaces. Great care is needed in the interpretation of a salt-spray test, as it has been found to favour thin iron phosphate coatings more than is justified by experience with natural weathering. In the motorcar industry the present custom is to use zinc phosphate coatings on the car bodies and all other parts exposed to the outside atmosphere. [Pg.716]

Table 15.13. This specification follows good industrial practice, with additional safeguards in rinsing to remove residues to treatment solutions. Nonaccelerated treatments must be followed by a single rinse which may contain chromate accelerated treatments must be followed by three rinses—cold water, hot water and a final chromate rinse. Table 15.14 shows the salt-spray test requirements for phosphate coatings with various finishes without formation of rust the paints and lacquer have the additional requirement that no rust shall be visible beyond 0-2 in (5 mm) from the deliberate scratches and no blistering, lifting or flaking beyond 0-05 in (1-27 mm) from the original boundaries of the scratches. Table 15.13. This specification follows good industrial practice, with additional safeguards in rinsing to remove residues to treatment solutions. Nonaccelerated treatments must be followed by a single rinse which may contain chromate accelerated treatments must be followed by three rinses—cold water, hot water and a final chromate rinse. Table 15.14 shows the salt-spray test requirements for phosphate coatings with various finishes without formation of rust the paints and lacquer have the additional requirement that no rust shall be visible beyond 0-2 in (5 mm) from the deliberate scratches and no blistering, lifting or flaking beyond 0-05 in (1-27 mm) from the original boundaries of the scratches.
The American Aeronautical Material Specification AMS 2480 A calls for 150h salt-spray test without rusting extending more than 0-125 in (3-175 mm) on either side of scratch marks, using a black enamel finish for the phosphate coating. [Pg.718]

Salt spray test. The model coatings of Table I are of the high solid type used in automotive top coats. Their primary function is not corrosion protection since this is first of all a matter of phosphate layer, electrocoat and/or primer. However, the topcoats may contribute to corrosion protection by their barrier function for water, oxygen and salts. Therefore their permeability is important as one of the factors in the corrosion protection by the total coating system. We feel that a salt spray test of the model coatings directly applied to a steel surface is of little relevance for their corrosion protection performance in a real system. [Pg.113]

A similar coating system (two-coat coilcoating system on phosphated and chromate passivated galvanized steel) was exposed to a pure salt spray test (360 h). The... [Pg.555]

Both (PPy)s and (PPyXn films were prepared in the galvanostatic mode (j = 4 mA/cm ) and had thickness between 3 and 10 pm. The (PPyXn films heated at 180°C for 30 min in order to achieve polycondensation of the modified polymer chains. Both samples were over-coated with cath horetic paints (total thicloiess about 28 pm) and then compared in salt spray tests with phosphated steels covered with the same thickness of cataphoretic paint These tests were performed for 500 h, after which adherence was checked. It is found that the adherence properties are similar for all samples. The main difference is that corrosion propagation around the streaks is twice as small for (PPy)m than as for (PPy), ch shows behavior identical with tfiat of the phosphat steel system 02). [Pg.133]

Lyon, Thompson, and Johnson [56] point out that the high sodium chloride content of the salt spray test can resnlt in corrosion morphologies and behaviors that are not representative of natnral conditions. Harrison has pointed out that the test is inappropriate for use on zinc—galvanized snbstrates or primers with zinc phosphate pigments, for example — becanse, in the constant wetness of the salt spray test, zinc undergoes a corrosion mechanism that it wonld not nndergo in real service [57]. This is a well-known and well-docnmented phenomenon and is discnssed in depth in chapter 7. [Pg.151]

Other forms of coating systems which contain corrosion inhibitors include in-situ phosphatising coatings such as those described by Neuder et al. [126] where functionalised aryl-phosphonic and arylphosphoric acids were added to an epoxy primer. The inhibitors were shown to deposit uniform metal-phosphate products on the substrate surface and provide a similar level of performance to chromate-inhibited control samples when tested over 3000 h in a neutral salt spray test. [Pg.167]

Jaudon tested phosphate coatings with and without paint and found the salt-spray resistance, as judged by the first appearance of rust, to be as follows ... [Pg.715]

The "Mannich" adduct synthesized from the condensation of formaldehyde, 2-(methylamino)ethanol and poly-4-vinylphenol as shown in Structure I, has been evaluated as a function of molecular weight versus corrosion resistance as measured by salt spray and humidity tests on Bonderite 1000, an iron phosphate conversion coating. The molecular weight of the polymer was varied from approximately = 2,900 to 60,000. The corrosion resistance results were essentially equivalent over the molecular weight range evaluated. [Pg.209]

On zinc phosphate conversion coatings, the "Mannich" derivatives of poly-4-vinylphenol have demonstrated performance equivalent to chromic chromate systems in salt spray, humidity, and physical testing. In addition. Table III illustrates results observed with automotive body paint systems evaluated by the "scab" or "cycle" test which causes failure more typical of actual end use conditions than do salt spray evaluations. Again, results equivalent to chromic-chromate post-treatments were obtained. In addition, the humidity resistance and adhesion tests were essentially equivalent to the chromium controls. [Pg.209]

The salt water immersion test (SWI) and the standard salt spray (fog) test (SS) were conducted for both ISPCs and control baking enamels applied on bare CRS, iron phosphated B-1000, and BD+P60 panels. The painted coupons of about 1.0 mil dry film thickness cured at 163 C for 15 minutes were X-cut through the film to the substrate and then either immersed in a 3% NaCI solution (SWI test) or subjected to a continuous salt-solution spray in a test chamber (SS test). After a specified duration of testing, the specimens were removed from the salt solution, and the coated surface was immediately dried. A DUCK brand tape (Manco, Inc., Westlake, OH) was applied over the X-cut and then removed, and the protective performance was... [Pg.54]

Figure 6. Salt spray (fog) tests (100 hours) for the control and ISPC formulas of water reducible baking enamel on bare CRS, iron phosphated B-IOOO, and iron phosphated plus chromated, B-1000 + P60 coupons. Figure 6. Salt spray (fog) tests (100 hours) for the control and ISPC formulas of water reducible baking enamel on bare CRS, iron phosphated B-IOOO, and iron phosphated plus chromated, B-1000 + P60 coupons.
A conductive polymer film of polypyrrole doped with polymolybdate anions was electrodeposited onto steel and found to provide corrosion protection in neutral and acidic 3.5% NaCl solution [152]. The anodic codeposition of polypyrrole and Ti02 onto mild steel in an oxalic acid medium has been described [153,154]. The PPy and Ti02 composite showed a considerable improvement in anticorrosion properties with respect to PPy films in salt spray and weight-loss tests. It was suggested that these composite films could be applied as a primary coating replacement for the phosphatized layers on mild steel [154]. [Pg.1624]


See other pages where Phosphating salt spray tests is mentioned: [Pg.223]    [Pg.720]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.1626]    [Pg.749]    [Pg.589]    [Pg.2117]    [Pg.461]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.604]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.718]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.560]    [Pg.56]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.64 ]




SEARCH



Salt-spray testing

Test, testing salt spray

© 2024 chempedia.info