Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Philosophy quantum mechanics

Bridgman had strong views on the importance of empirical research, influenced as little as possible by theory, and this helped him test the influence of numerous variables that lesser mortals failed to heed. He kept clear of quantum mechanics and dislocation theory, for instance. He became deeply ensconced in the philosophy of physics research for instance, he published a famous book on dimensional analysis, and another on the logic of modern physics . When he sought to extrapolate his ideas into the domain of social science, he found himself embroiled in harsh disputes this has happened to a number of eminent scientists, for instance, J.D. Bernal. Walter s book goes into this aspect of Bridgman s life in detail. [Pg.173]

I restrict my attention to non-relativistic pioneer quantum mechanics of 1925-6, and even further to the time independent formulation. Numerous other developments have taken place in quantum theory, such as Dirac s relativistic treatment of the hydrogen atom (Dirac [1928]) and various modern quantum field theories have been constructed (Redhead [1986]). Also, much work has been done in the philosophy of quantum theory such as the question of E.P.R. correlations (Bell [1966]). However, it seems fair to say that no fundamental change has occurred in quantum mechanics since the pioneer version was established. The version of quantum mechanics used on a day-to-day basis by most chemists and physicists remains as the 1925-6 version (Heisenberg [1925], Schrodinger [1926]). [Pg.18]

Eric Scerri studied chemistry at the Universities of London, Cambridge and Southampton, and obtained a Ph.D. in the history and philosophy of science from King s College, London on the question of "The Reduction of Chemistry to Quantum Mechanics," He has been a research felloiu in the history and philosophy of science at the London School of Economics and at the California Institute of Technology. He is currently an assistant professor of chemistry at Bradley University, where he also teaches histoiy and philosophy of chemistry, which are also his main research interests. He is editor of the new journal Foundations of Chemistry. Address Department of Chemistry, Bradley University, Peoria, IL 61625. Internet scerri bradley.edu. [Pg.35]

Scerri, E. R. 1991. Electronic configurations, quantum mechanics and reduction. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 309-325. [Pg.42]

It is indeed a great honor to be invited to contribute to this memorial volume. I should say from the outset that I never met Lowdin but nevertheless feel rather familiar with at least part of his wide-ranging writing. In 1986 I undertook what I believe may have been the first PhD thesis in the new field of philosophy of chemistry. My topic was the question of the reduction of chemistry to quantum mechanics. Not surprisingly this interest very soon brought me to the work of Lowdin and in particular his analysis of rigorous error bounds in ab initio calculations (Lowdin, 1965). [Pg.91]

J. Baggott (1992) The Meaning of Quantum Theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford). M. Jammer (1974) The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (John Wiley Sons, New York). [Pg.344]

The young smdent, aged 20, published in the Cahiers du Libre Examen (a local student journal) two papers Essay on physical philosophy and The problem of determinism, followed by a third one, in collaboration with Helene Bolle (who would become his first wife), The evolution. Remarkably, the roots of his future interests were already present in these works of his youth determinism, the interpretation of quantum mechanics, biological evolution, and, above all, the concept of time. [Pg.4]

Figures 8.6 and 8.8 are both representations that suffer from the limits of our informational technique, as they show two distinct things at the bottom, implying an initial separation between living organisms and their environment. This separation is just what the notion of co-emergence negates. The complementarity between yin and yang in classic Chinese philosophy comes to mind they also cannot be separated from each other or the complementarity between wave and particle in quantum mechanics they can be distinguished from each other only when carrying out a specihc experiment. Figures 8.6 and 8.8 are both representations that suffer from the limits of our informational technique, as they show two distinct things at the bottom, implying an initial separation between living organisms and their environment. This separation is just what the notion of co-emergence negates. The complementarity between yin and yang in classic Chinese philosophy comes to mind they also cannot be separated from each other or the complementarity between wave and particle in quantum mechanics they can be distinguished from each other only when carrying out a specihc experiment.
Messiah, A. Quantum Mechanics, Dover Publications, Inc., Mincola, NY. 2000. Omncs. R. Quantum Philosophy, Understanding and interpreting Contemporary Science, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1999. [Pg.202]

Roland Omns, Quantum Philosophy Understanding and Interpreting Contemporary Science (Princeton University Press, 1999) presents an excellent treatment of the philosophical consequences of quantum mechanics. [Pg.198]

Mary Jo Nye enumerates the topics treated in the Journal as molecular spectroscopy and molecular structures, the quantum mechanical treatment of electronic structure of molecules and crystals and the problem of chemical binding, the kinetics of chemical reactions from the standpoint of basic physical principles, the thermodynamic properties of substances and calculation by statistical mechanical methods, the structure of crystals, and surface phenomena. M.J. Nye, From Chemical Philosophy to Theoretical Chemistry. Dynamics of Matter and Dynamics of Disciplines (Berkeley University of California Press 1993), 254. Many of these were considered by Barriol, as we will see later in this chapter. [Pg.117]

Polanyi s scientific work lay most squarely within a physical chemistry that encompassed thermodynamics, X-ray crystallography, the study of reaction rates, and the application of quantum mechanics to the study of molecular forces and transition states. In two particular areas, the investigation of solid-surface adsorption phenomena and X-ray diffraction studies of the properties of solids, Polanyi helped establish new scientific specialities, at the boundaries of physics and chemistry, for studying the solid state. He also turned his research experiences in these fields into a basis for the formulation of a new philosophy of science centered on scientific practice, rather than scientific ideas. [1] It is these themes that I would like to explore, with remarks in my conclusion on Polanyi s influence in solid-state science. [Pg.246]

This section contains the background for the combination of density functional theory and molecular mechanics. Following the basic philosophy of quantum mechan-ics/molecular mechanics approaches we partition the total system into at least two parts which can be treated simultaneously. The quantum mechanical subsystem is described using DFT and the classical subsystem is given by molecular mechanics. Based on the QM/MM approach we have that the total energy of the system is... [Pg.356]

The spot produced by the material I-frame system (if there is any) is given a particulate property. However, there is no compelling quantum-mechanical reason that would permit to identify the real-space event to a particle, although in the particle model philosophy such assignment would seem natural. In this case, the I-frame kinetic energy would play the role of energy carrier. [Pg.70]

Feb. 20,1844, Vienna, Austria - Sep. 5,1906 in Duino, Austro-Hungarian Empire, now Italy) is justly famous for his invention of statistical mechanics. At different times in his fife he held chairs in theoretical physics at Graz, and in mathematics at Vienna. He also lectured in philosophy. His principal achievement, and the trigger for innumerable vitriolic attacks from the scientific establishment, was his introduction of probability theory into the fundamental laws of physics. This radical program demohshed two centuries of confidence that the fundamental laws of Nature were deterministic. Astonishingly, he also introduced the concept of discrete energy levels more th an thirty years before the development of quantum mechanics. [Pg.54]

We have seen that decoherence theory, according to its advocates [128], makes the wave-function collapse assumption obsolete The environmental fluctuations are enough to destroy quantum mechanical coherence and generate statistical properties indistinguishable from those produced by genuine wave-function collapses. All this is unquestionable, and if a disagreement exists, it rests more on philosophy than on physical facts. Thus, there is apparently no need for a new theory. However, we have seen that all this implies the assumption that the environment produces white noise and that the system of interest, in the classical limit, produces ordinary diffusion. As we move from... [Pg.468]

This is the essence of science. Even though I do not understand quantum mechanics or the nerve cell membrane, I trust those who do. Most scientists are quite ignorant about most sciences but all use a shared grammar that allows them to recognize their craft when they see it. The motto of the Royal Society of London is Nullius in verba trust not in words. Observation and experiment are what count, not opinion and introspection. Few working scientists have much respect for those who try to interpret nature in metaphysical terms. For most wearers of white coats, philosophy is to science as pornography is to sex it is cheaper, easier, and... [Pg.347]

For solvation modeling, see C. J. Cramer and D. G. Truhlar, this volume. Continuum and Solvation Models Classical and Quantum Mechanical Implementation. For molecular mechanics, see D. B. Boyd and K. Lipkowitz, /. Chem. Educ., S9, 269 (1982). Molecular Mechanics. The Method and Its Underlying Philosophy. [Pg.204]

Since the concepts of atoms and bonds are central to chemical understanding, approaches based on atom-additivity and bond-additivity are very appealing. Due to their simplicity, they were used in the early days for actual calculations, but nowadays they continue to be employed for interpretative purposes. Needless to say, their accuracy can be surpassed by methods based on quantum mechanics. As with field-free isolated molecules, early models used to estimate second- and third-order macroscopic nonlinear responses considered such simple schemes. In the following, we describe methods that treat either chemical bonds or atoms as the central quantities for evaluating the bulk NLO responses. The philosophy consists in incorporating in the description of these central constructs the effects of the surroundings. In this way the connection with more elaborate methods, such as the oriented gas model that focuses on one molecule with local field factor corrections, or with the crystalline orbital approach that reduces the system to its unit cell, is more obvious. In what follows, a selection of such schemes is analyzed and listed in Table VII. [Pg.80]

Does the particle nature of light cause its wave aspects Or vice versa All these questions may only be asked from the point of view of classical physics, they only have meaning from the classical view. Once quantum mechanical physics enters the scene, no one even attempts to answer the questions on the classical level, if my guess that brain and mind are parallel aspects of a more fundamental reality is nebulous, perhaps it will take on some relevance when a "quantum mechanics of philosophy" will be available, whether a process of mind studying mind will accomplish such a feat is still an open question. [Pg.92]


See other pages where Philosophy quantum mechanics is mentioned: [Pg.693]    [Pg.764]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.638]    [Pg.593]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.162]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.60 ]




SEARCH



Mechanical philosophy

Mechanism philosophy

Philosophy

Philosophy quantum mechanical theory

© 2024 chempedia.info