Pesticides aerial drift

Another consideration when planning field fortification levels for the matrices is the lowest level for fortification. The low-level fortification samples should be set high enough above the limit of quantitation (LOQ) of the analyte so as to ensure that inadvertent field contamination does not add to and does not drive up the field recovery of the low-fortification samples. Setting the low field fortification level too low will lead to unacceptably high levels of the analyte in low field spike matrix samples if inadvertent aerial drift or pesticide transport occurs in and around where the field fortification samples are located. Such inadvertent aerial drift or transport is extremely hard to avoid since wind shifts and temperature inversions commonly occur during mixer-loader/re-entry exposure studies. 

The principle public concern with regard to risk from herbicide application in the forest is not the overt, or occupational, exposure to pesticide applicators or to persons who might be in the spray zone. It is the possible injury from pesticide drift at a distance of a few hundred yards or a quarter of a mile, up to 5 to 20 miles. All aerially-applied pesticides will drift for some distance, whether they be applied by fixed-wing craft or helicopter. 

Potential mechanisms for pesticide dispersal and exposure of nontarget species would include direct contact of treated plants by animals (e.g., insects) entering the test plot with subsequent animal-borne dispersal of INA" bacteria, aerial drift from the test plot at time of application, and post application movement of INA" bacteria into the atmosphere with subsequent deposition in habitats that may favor bacterial colonization on plants, or movement into the upper atmosphere. 

One problem that has arisen with the use of herbicides in agriculture is spray or vapor drift. When fine spray droplets are released, especially if applied aerially, they may be deposited beyond the target area due to air movements to cause damage there. In the first place, this is a question of application technique. Herbicides, like other pesticides, should not be applied as sprays under windy conditions. In most... 

Drift and volatilization are important factors for large-scale transport from the treated plots. Whereas the range of drift of pesticide in droplets is limited to adjacent ecosystems, volatilization (i.e., vaporization) may lead to a large-scale aerial transport. The physics of spray drift involves Stake s law for the derivation of sedimentation velocities of droplets. 

Inhalation Route - Estimation of Vapour Exposure. In a study of drift exposure following aerial application of an organo-phosphorus pesticide, Crabbe t al (16) found that the vapour concentration in areas remote from the spray line increased gradually up to 10 hours after the spraying. Increasing temperature was undoubtedly the major explanation for this. Other factors such as volatility of the pesticide, windspeed and sorption properties of the target would also influence the actual vapour concentration on the target. 

To illustrate this distribution, Figure 1 shows the result of an actual aerial application of a typical pesticide spray to a broadleafed tree species (3). The "application level" (A) simply assumes that all the spray leaving the aircraft becomes uniformly distributed over the target area (1.12 kg/ha), and the curve shows the parathion levels analytically detected on a statistical sampling of leaves. A major part of the applied pesticide (B) fails to reach the canopy, as corroborated by Barry (2) with conifers, and is assumed to represent airborne drift, volatilization, and, to a lesser extent, penetration to the ground. Once on the... 

The containment of infestations of the spruce budworm is the major concern of Canadian forest spray programs (3). By 1976, the total area of severe budworm infestations in Canada exceeded 30 million ha, of which about 5 million ha were in New Brunswick, 12 million ha in Quebec and over 13 million ha in Ontario. Smaller infestations (less than 1 million ha) occurrred in Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland (4). The vast area involved has necessitated the use of aircraft for insecticide dispersal. Direct contamination of aquatic habitats situated within the spray region has been reported following aerial deposition of fenitrothion, the favored pesticide, while indirect contamination may have resulted from spray drift or from surface run-off following rainfall (5, 6). 

Despite their ease in handling, formulation, and application, dnsts are the least effective and, ultimately, the least economical of the pesticide formnla-tions. The reason is that dusts have a very poor rate of deposit on foliage, nnless it is wet from dew or rain. In agricultnre, for instance, an aerial application of a standard dust formulation of pesticide will result in 10 percent to 40 percent of the material reaching the crop. The remainder drifts npward and downwind. 

Fortunately, in comparison to the number of missions flown by agricultural aircraft, the incidence of significant drift incidents is low. It is the responsibility of all applicators to ensure that the aerial application of pesticides is optimised to avoid any off-target movement of pesticide which could have the potential to cause adverse economic impact or damage to the environment. 

So what is the future of agricultural aviation The author remains confident that aircraft provide a viable and efficient means of pesticide delivery in a wide range of environments and situations. How then should aerial application be managed to reduce the potential threat of off-target damage and spray drift ... 

Woods N., Craig I.P. and Dorr, G. (2001) Measurement of spray drift of pesticides arising from aerial application in cotton. Journal of Environmental Quality 30(3), May-June 2001, 697-701. 

Uses Dry cone, drift controi and deposition adjuvant for aerial applies. modifies vise., atomization, and shear chars, of aq. spray applies. deposition aid for pesticide sprays humectant props. evaporation reducing agent Regulatory FDA 40CFR 180.1001(c)(d) not regulated for shipping SARA Immediate Heaith Hazard... 

---