Robinson, Julian Perry

Perry-Robinson, Julian, The CWC The Success of Chemical Disarmament Negotiations, SIPRI Yearbook 1993. Oxford Oxford University Press (1993). 

Robinson, Julian Perry. The Rise of CB Weapons. The Problem of Chemical and Biological Warfare A Study of The Historical, Technical, Military, Legal and Political Aspects of CBW, and Possible Disarmament Measures. Vol. 1. Stockholm Almqvist Wiksell, 1971. 

Interview with Julian Perry Robinson, SPRU, University of Sussex (5 July 2004). 

Compare Julian Perry Robinson, Chemical Warfare Arms Control A Framework for... 

Julian Perry Robinson, Memorandum submitted by Professor J P Perry Robinson, University of Sussex, Foreign Affairs Committee, Eighth Report, Weapons of Mass Destruction, 25 July 2000, Appendix 29, p. 203. 

The observation was first made by Robin Clarke and Julian Perry Robinson in United Kingdom Research Policy , in Steven Rose (ed.), Chemical and Biological Warfare, (London, 1968), p. 109. 

The fullest summary of the disposal of chemical weapons after the Second World War is to be found in The Rise of CB Weapons , Julian Perry Robinson, SIPRI, op. cit., pp. 153 n. and 305 n. 

Calculations based upon assessment by Julian Perry Robinson, and SIPRI Yearbook (1973), p. 271. 

Julian Perry Robinson, Seth Cams and Professor Matthew Meselson were equally reassuring. Perry Robinson asserted that elements of the media and the Pentagon had overestimated the significance of Iraq s chemical stockpile. He maintained that its primary value was psychological, that the casualty effects of nerve gas would be blunted by its volatility in hot desert conditions, and that the Iraqi stockpile was far too small to be employed effectively over the potential size of battlefield. He also suspected that Iraq s air power - the most potent means of delivery -would not last long in a battle with coalition air forces, and that the SCUD missiles would prove too inaccurate to attack air bases systematically. Meselson affirmed that the Iraqi chemical attacks were never any more than marginally effective against forces with anti-chemical protective... 

The Report of the Chemical Warfare Review Commission (June 1985 Chairman Walter J. Stoessel Jr) gave details of the types of chemical munition and delivery system in the US inventory. More generally, the US has published sufficient data to enable expert analysts to estimate US holdings of chemical weapons. See in particular Julian Perry Robinson, NATO Chemical Weapons Policy and Posture, p. 26. Andrew Cockbum, The Threat Inside the Soviet Military Machine,... 

Julian Perry Robinson, Chemical and Biological warfare Analysis of Recent Reports. . . ... 

Julian Perry Robinson, in conversation with the author. This does, of course, raise the question of against whose soman the Yugoslavs were seeking protection. 

Title VII, Section 8093 of the Continuing Resolution for Fiscal Year 1986 amending Section 1411 of the Department of Defense Authorization Act Fiscal Year 1986, approved by Congress 19 December 1985. Cited in Julian Perry Robinson, Chemical and Biological Warfare Developments 1985, p. 19. 

Statement before the Strategic and Theater Nuclear Forces Subcommittee, Senate Armed Services Committee, 10 April 1985, cited in Binary Chemical Weapons selected Documents, prepared by the Sub-committee on Arms Control, International Security and Science of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, July 1986. For a detailed account of NATO requirements, see Julian Perry Robinson, NATO Chemical Weapons Policy and Posture. 

Julian Perry Robinson, NATO Chemical Weapons Policy and Posture,... 

See, for example, Julian Perry Robinson, NATO Chemical Weapons Policy and Posture, p. 49ff, confirmed by author s conversations with military personnel at SHAPE. 

This book could not have been produced without the financial assistance of the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust, and I am most grateful to the trustees. Like all academics working in this field, I must acknowledge my debt to the numerous SIPRI publications on this subject, and to the author of many of them, Julian Perry Robinson, whose help has been generous and invaluable. I should like also to offer particular thanks for their encouragement and practical assistance to Lawrence Freedman and Dr John Walker, and... 

---