Performance test sample

Performance test samples (also called quality control samples or blind samples) are a quality control measure to help eliminate bias introduced by the analyst knowing the concentration of the calibration check sample. These samples of known composition are provided to the analyst as unknowns. Results are then compared with the known values, usually by a quality assurance manager. 

What is the difference between a calibration check and a performance test sample ... 

Then begin taking the unit samples. Some experienced engineers take duplicate samples. Send one to the lab and save the other, just in case of a mix-up. It is best to personally observe the shift operators when they catch the samples. The performance test samples will likely be obtained, at unfamiliar spots, and erroneous samples may thus be submitted. More frequently, the person catching the sample will not allow sufficient time to thoroughly flush out the sample line. 

The aim of the work we present in this paper is to optimize the control parameters used in particles magnetic and interpret the obtained results. Experiments are performed on samples of welds or materials containing known defects. The realized and tested defects are grooves situated at different depths with variables dimensions. Other types of defects have been studied (inclusions, lack of penetration, etc.). 

The above-mentioned codes contain requirements for accelerated durabiUty tests. In addition, interlayer manufacturers and laminators expose test samples for several years under extreme weather conditions, eg, the Florida coast and Arizona desert. The laminated products weather extremely well, with no change in the plastic interlayer. Occasionally, clouding is noted around the edges when exposed to high humidity for long periods, but this is reversible. Colored areas of PVB laminates may fade while subjected to extensive uv/solar irradiation, which could cause an appearance issue. This has not, however, been shown to alter the laminate s other performance properties. 

The study on commercial HDPE samples could not provide a correlation of the izod impact test with the field performance test, i.e., drop impact resistance on moulded products [113]. It was found that the sample of highest density and lowest izod impact strength passed the drop impact test, but other samples of lower density and higher izod impact strength could not withstand shock loading by drop impact and failed in brittle manner. This may be due to the fact that velocities and modes of loading vary widely in different impact tests. It has been reported that even the qualitative agreement between the different impact tests is poor because the test bars and moulded products often have different orientation characteristics, particularly near the surface [115]. 

The interpretation of sterility results is divided into two stages by the USP relative to the type of sterility failure if one occurs. If sterility failure of the test samples occurred because of improper aseptic technique or as a fault of the test itself, stage 1 may be repeated with the same sample size. Sample size is doubled in a stage 2 testing, which is performed if microbial growth is observed in stage 1 and there is no reason to believe that the test was invalid. The only absolute method to guarantee the sterility of a batch would be to test every vial or ampoule. 

Performing held sampling, and/or bench testing, and/or pilot testing... 

The classic way that we perform force versus deformation measurements is to deform a sample at a constant rate, while we record the force induced within it. We normally carry out such tests in one of three configurations tensile, compressive, or flexural, which are illustrated in Fig. 8.1. We can also test samples in torsion or in a combination of two or more loading configurations. For the sake of simplicity, most tests are uni-axial in nature, but we can employ bi-axial or multi-axial modes when needed,... 

We prepare force versus compression plots in a similar fashion to force versus elongation plots. We generally perform compressive testing over a much more limited range of strain than tensile testing. Samples typically take the form of thick pads, which do not break in the same manner as tensile specimens. The limit of compressive strain can approach 100% for low density foams, but is much less for other samples. The most common property that we obtain from this mode of testing is compressive modulus. 

Method performance study All laboratories follow the same written protocol and use the same test method to measure a quantity (usually concentration of an analyte) in sets of identical test samples. The results are used to estimate the performance characteristics of the method, which are usually within-laboratory- and between-laboratory precision and - if relevant - additional parameters such as sensitivity, limit of detection, recovery, and internal quality control parameters (IUPAC Orange Book [1997, 2000]). 

Laboratory performance study. Laboratories use the method of their choice to measure one or more quantities on one or more homogeneous and stable test samples in order to assess the performance of the laboratory or analyst. The reported results are compared among themselves, with those of other laboratories, or with the known or assigned reference value, usually with the objective of evaluating or improving laboratory performances (IUPAC Orange Book [1997, 2000]). 

---