Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Impact Izod test

The study on commercial HDPE samples could not provide a correlation of the izod impact test with the field performance test, i.e., drop impact resistance on moulded products [113]. It was found that the sample of highest density and lowest izod impact strength passed the drop impact test, but other samples of lower density and higher izod impact strength could not withstand shock loading by drop impact and failed in brittle manner. This may be due to the fact that velocities and modes of loading vary widely in different impact tests. It has been reported that even the qualitative agreement between the different impact tests is poor because the test bars and moulded products often have different orientation characteristics, particularly near the surface [115]. [Pg.288]

TEN-fOOT FALL —IZOD IMPACT TEST m —REFRIGERATOH ODOR-SLAM... [Pg.89]

The Izod impact test may indicate the need to avoid inside sharp corners on parts made of such materials. For example, nylon and acetal-type plastics, which in molded products are among the toughest materials, are notch-sensitive and register relatively low values on the notched Izod impact test. [Pg.312]

Table 7-17 Example of a simplified readout for TPs toughness or fracture behavior Izod impact test results... Table 7-17 Example of a simplified readout for TPs toughness or fracture behavior Izod impact test results...
Charpy Izod impact test, 19 580-581 Charts, heat-exchanger effectiveness, 13 255-256... [Pg.164]

Secondary Properties of Candidate Materials. In terms of maximum and minimum use temperatures, we must simply ensure that our final candidate materials meet the use temperature requirements listed in Table 8.10. This design specification is not particularly restrictive, so we will save it for last. The most common measure of impact resistance is using an Izod impact test (cf. Figure 5.79). A similar test is called the Charpy test, a schematic diagram for which is shown in Figure 8.15. We will find relevant impact resistance data for our candidate materials, if available, and ensure that this design criterion is met as well. [Pg.838]

IZOD impact test—method for determining the behavior of materials subjected to shock loading. Specimen supported as a cantilever beam is strack by a weight at the end of a pendulum. Impact strength is determined from the amount of energy required to fracture the specimen. The specimen may be notched or unnotched. [Pg.112]

Impact Test. Impact testing is of importance because adhesives, like most polymeric materials, are sensitive to high rates of application of force. The resistance of an adhesive to impact can be determined by ASTM D 950. This test is analogous to the Izod impact test method used for impact studies on materials. [Pg.454]

Noninstrumented Izod Testing. The impact strength, reported in joules per meter of notch, was measured at temperatures between 25° and — 30°C. The samples were cooled to the test temperature using a Lauda Kryostat and equilibrated in the Kryostat for at least one and one half hours prior to testing. Five to seven seconds were required to remove a sample from the Kryostat, mount, and perform the Izod impact test. Ten samples of each composition were tested at each temperature. [Pg.481]

In the notched Izod impact test, with the exception of some rubber modified plastics, the fracture surface of a specimen that has failed ductilely exhibits significant inward collapsing on the sides of the impact bar near the notch, indicating that a large amount of plastic flow has... [Pg.102]

PC/PE. In the case of PC/PE, plane strain alone does not produce significant changes in the yield stress and the deformation behavior. Its yield locus in the tension-tension quadrant is therefore either very nearly a quarter circle or similar to a Tresca locus. The exact shape of the locus can be determined only by much more elaborate biaxial tests. This material is not very notch sensitive compared with PC. The energy to break in a notched Izod impact test is 15 ft-lb/inch for Vs-inch thick bars and 11 ft-lb/inch for 4-inch bars whereas for PC the latter figure is about 2 ft-lb/inch. This reduction in notch sensitivity over pure PC appears to be related to the material s ability to void internally, probably relieving the plane strain. [Pg.114]

Table 14.4 Izod Impact Test for Rigid Polymers at 24° C... Table 14.4 Izod Impact Test for Rigid Polymers at 24° C...
Figure 3. Results of notched Izod impact tests versus temperature for PA-6-EPR blends with different rubber contents at a constant rubber-particle size (0.3-0.4 pm). Key , 0 vol% , 6.3 vol% +, 12.5 vol% A, 18.4 vol% and O, 24.3 vol% (13). Figure 3. Results of notched Izod impact tests versus temperature for PA-6-EPR blends with different rubber contents at a constant rubber-particle size (0.3-0.4 pm). Key , 0 vol% , 6.3 vol% +, 12.5 vol% A, 18.4 vol% and O, 24.3 vol% (13).
Figure 8.9. SEM micrograph of block PP after Izod impact test. Contrast was obtained by ion etching. The interfacial debonding and rubber cavitation are seen [Nakagawa, 1976]. Figure 8.9. SEM micrograph of block PP after Izod impact test. Contrast was obtained by ion etching. The interfacial debonding and rubber cavitation are seen [Nakagawa, 1976].
PS blends with EPDM were compatibilized by addition of either SB (polystyrene/polybutadiene di-block copolymer) or SEP (polystyrene/ethylene propylene di-block copolymer) and were blended in a corotating twin-screw extruder T = 200°C (Table 11.9). The strands were quenched and pelletized. Some of the pellets were injection-molded (200°C) into 4 mm-thick specimens and irradiated to 50 kGy (3-MeV electron accelerator). Another part of the pellets was similarly irradiated and then injection-molded. The samples for notched Izod impact testing (ASTM D256) were annealed for 24 h at 80°C, or were left at RT for 3 weeks, before testing [van Gisbergen et al., 1990,1991b]. [Pg.836]

The Charpy test is similar to the Izod impact test. In both the tests, flexural impact takes place by a pendulum (Figure 12.9) striking a barshaped test piece (Figure 12.10). However, as described before, there are quite significant dif-... [Pg.876]

LDPE has a lower coefficient of expansion (10 X 10 cm/cm C) and a lower heat deflection temperature (40 C) than hope, lope does not break when subjected to the Izod impact test. The of lope is about 120 C. [Pg.136]

Izod impact test See test, Izod impact. [Pg.325]


See other pages where Impact Izod test is mentioned: [Pg.535]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.535]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.535]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.493]    [Pg.504]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.876]    [Pg.894]    [Pg.535]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.534]    [Pg.534]    [Pg.51]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.75 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.104 , Pg.107 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.37 ]




SEARCH



Analysis of the Charpy and Izod Impact Tests Using Fracture Mechanics

Impact testing

Impact tests Izod notched

Izod impact strength testing

Izod impact test specimens

Izod impact test specimens fiber composites

Izod impact test specimens plastics

Izod impact test, fracture resistance

Izod impact tests Mechanical testing

Izod impact tests Melt processing

Izod impact tests Metals

Izod test

Test, testing impact

Testing Izod impact test (

© 2024 chempedia.info