Performance measurement techniques significance

There is an increased use of flammability tests, which measure fundamental properties as opposed to tests that simulate a specific fire scenario. The former can be used in conjunction with mathematical models to predict the performance of a material in a range of fire scenarios. This approach has become feasible due to the significant progress that has been made in the past few decades in our understanding of the physics and chemistry of fire, mathematical modeling of fire phenomena and measurement techniques. However, there will always be materials that exhibit a behavior that cannot be captured in bench-scale tests and computer models. The fire performance of those materials can only be determined in full-scale tests. 

Table I compares results achieved when seven variables that may affect the performance of a particular catalyst were tested one-at-a-time with results from a statistical design (fractional factorial) approach. In this comparison, a shift in measured performance is assumed to be real if it represents at least twice the uncertainty of the measuring technique. The one-at-a-time strategy, still prevalent among many catalyst researchers, requires 48 experiments to determine with 95% confidence which variables significantly impact catalyst performance. Whereas, with the fractional factorial approach, this same information was obtained in only 16 experiments with a 98.5% confidence level. The fractional factorial approach also shows possible interactions among the variables the classical one-at-a-time approach does not.

Several luminescence studies of lanthanide complexation have been performed. This technique has many advantages over ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) measurements. Significantly lower metal ion concentrations are required for measurements, thereby allowing complexation studies to be more accurate and carried out at lower ionic strengths, closer to typical biological concentrations. After excitation at 318 nm, a 614 nm transition is observed for... 

Time-Delay Compensation, Time delays are a common occurrence in the process industries because of the presence of recycle loops, fluid-flow transport lags, and dead time in composition analysis. In crystallization processes, certain techniques for CSD analysis and concentration measurement involve significant time delays. The presence of a time delay (0) in a process severely limits the performance of a conventional PID control system, reducing the stability margin of the closed-loop control system. Consequently, the controller gain must be reduced below that used for a process without delay. Thus, the response of the closed-loop system will be sluggish compared to that of the system with no time delay. 

Water analyses are still performed today with the aim of immission monitoring, but the significance of the measurement task has shifted considerably, towards emission measurement, i.e. towards the monitoring of users or producers of radioactive substances. Together with the more stringent requirements and other international recommendations regarding the detection sensitivity of measurement techniques, there has been a marked effect on the methods employed. New measurement instructions meeting these requirements have been available for some years. 

Even for the large organization with significant annual hours worked, in addition to historical data, hazard-specific and qualitative performance measures (safety audits, perception surveys, the incident recall technique) are also necessary, particularly to identify low-probability/severe-consequence risks. 

A repeated measures ANOVA on error rates did not show a significant main effect of navigation technique (F2,34=3.102, p=0.058) but did show a main effect of task (F5,85=19.105, p<0.001). There was an interaction between navigation technique and task (Fio,170=4.114, p<0.001). Overall the error rates reaffirm the performance measure collected from the completion time data. 

These apparent discrepancies (from no degradation to measurable and significant performance loss with each cycle) in the various literature results can perhaps be attributed to differences in the experimental protocol and in the details of the cell assembly. In particnlar, one expects that differences in membrane electrode assembly (MEA) fabrication technique can have considerable impact on the location of where water collects in the cold state, and on the relative strength of adhesion between adjacent layers. 

An experimental activity on the stress measurement of a pressure vessel using the SPATE technique was carried out. It was demontrated that this approach allows to define the distribution of stress level on the vessel surface with a quite good accuracy. The most significant advantage in using this technique rather than others is to provide a true fine map of stresses in a short time even if a preliminary meticolous calibration of the equipment has to be performed. 

---