PELS and TLVs

Chemical and common names of all ingredients determined to be healtli liazards mid comprising less than 1 percent (0.1 percent for carcinogens) of tlie mi.xlure must also be listed if they can still exceed an established OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) or tlic ACGIH Threshold Limit Value (TLV) or present a health risk to exposed employees in tlicsc concentrations. The next chapter will address PELs and TLVs in further detail. 

The EPA reports toxicity reference concentrations (RfC) for inhaled substances PEL and TLV are for inhalation exposures, and ADI and RfD are for oral exposures. 

The current permissible exposure levels for beryllium of 0.01 mcg/m3 averaged over a 30-day period or 2 mcg/m3 over an 8-hour period are insufficiently protective to prevent chronic beryllium disease. Both NIOSH and the ACGIH have recommended that the PEL and TLV be reduced to 0.05 mcg/m3. These recommendations have not yet been implemented. 

Exposure Limits PELs and TLVs. Threshold limit values (TLVs) were developed in the 1940s, long before the existence of OSHA. The TLV is defined as the airborne concentration of a contaminant to which it is believed that most workers may be repeatedly exposed, day after day, without developing adverse health effects. Developed and maintained by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), these values have been determined based on industrial experience and animal and human studies. 

Both PEL and TLV refer to toxic chemical exposure levels. Just remember, the PEL values of toxic chemicals are published by OSHA, while the TLV values are published by the ACGIH. You can find PEL values on the OSHA Web site (www.osha.gov). Look under regulations. PEL values refer to inhalation exposure. TLV values are published by ACGIH annually. Most chemicals have identical PEL and TLV values. 

PEL and TLV are good exposure guidelines. The distinction between PEL and TLV is in terms of legal impact. PEL values are enforceable by OSHA, while the TLV values are guides and have no enforcement capability associated with them. PEL and TLV are... 

The PEL and TLV-TWA for synthetic graphite is 10 mgm of total dust, 5mgm for synthetic graphite respirable dust and 2.5 mgm for natural graphite respirable dust. Zustra [20] has specified an air standard of 5 carbon fibers/cc, whilst the US Navy has a limit of 3 carbon fibers/cc. 

What is the difference between PELs and TLVs Explain why knowledge of these exposure measurements is important. 

Based on this information and what the client tells me about how the powder is used (e.g. number of employees exposed and controls), I have a good idea if there will be any concerns before sampling is performed. In this case, no problems were anticipated. Based upon my professional judgment, the target PEL and TLV at 4 mg/m3 as an 8-hr. TWA could be easily achieved. 

The code also said the mean exposure concentration, based on a minimum of six measurements, had to be less than 10% of the DNEL to be considered acceptable. Betweai 10% and 100% of the DNEL exposure was uncertain. The code was giving a target of nearly less than 0.01 mg/m3 for the powder. That s some 400 times lower than its current PEL and TLV. 

Beef up your IH exposure monitoring capabilities. Predictions are there will be many more DNELs than PELs and TLVs. This means there will be more occasions to conduct IH monitoring. 

Use of isopropyl alcohol in industrial appHcations does not present a health hazard. The alcohol produces anesthetic effects in high vapor concentration. Consequently, the OSHA permissible exposure limit (PEL) and the ACGIH threshold limit value (TLV) have been estabUshed at 400 ppm (0.098 mg/L) for an 8-h exposure (TWA) (138). This level causes a mild irritation of the eyes, nose, and throat (139). However, the TLV level does not produce symptoms of anesthesia (140). The OSHA and ACGIH short-term exposure limits (STELs) are 500 ppm. The odor threshold for isopropyl alcohol ranges from 3 to 200 ppm, which is the minimum concentration having identifiable odor (141). 

Techniques for handling sodium in commercial-scale appHcations have improved (5,23,98,101,102). Contamination by sodium oxide is kept at a minimum by completely welded constmction and inert gas-pressured transfers. Residual oxide is removed by cold traps or micrometallic filters. Special mechanical pumps or leak-free electromagnetic pumps and meters work well with clean Hquid sodium. Corrosion of stainless or carbon steel equipment is minimi2ed by keeping the oxide content low. The 8-h TWA PEL and ceiling TLV for sodium or sodium oxide or hydroxide smoke exposure is 2 mg/m. There is no defined AID for pure sodium, as even the smallest quantity ingested could potentially cause fatal injury. 

Exposure Limits. The Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) of 1990 Hsts a multitude of acetates, phthalates, formates, and acrylates along with the corresponding permissible exposure limits and threshold limit values (76). The PEL data is Hsted in Table 2. If there is potential for exposure to an organic ester for which PEL or TLV data has been identified, then an exposure limit lower than that Hsted is usually selected for working in that environment. 

Measures of inhalation toxicity include ERPG, TLV, TLV-STEL, TLV-TWA, PEL, and IDLH. 

Established OELs such as OSHA PELs and ACGIH TLVs, cover only a small fraction of the substances that are found in the workplace, and even for those chemicals discrepancies are commonly encountered among the different lists, For this reason, the European Union (EU) is trying an approach in which... 

The route of entiy section describes the primary patluvay by which the chemical enters the body. There are tlu-ee principal routes of entry inlialation, skin, and ingestion. This section of the MSDS supplies the PEL. the TLV, and other e.xposure levels used or recommended by the chemical manufacturer. 

Substance for which the TLV is higher than the OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) and/or the NIOSH Recommended Exposure Limit (REL). Simple asphyxiant. Some gases and vapours present at high concentrations act as asphyxiants by reducing the oxygen content of air. Many of these are odourless and colourless. Many also pose a fire or explosion risk, often at values below which asphyxiation can occur. (Although capable of asphyxiation, they are not considered to be substances hazardous to health under COSHH.)... 

Use the NIOSH web site to determine and compare the PEL, IDLH concentration, and TLV for ethylene oxide, benzene, ethanol, ethylene trichloride, fluorine, and hydrogen chloride. 

At lower concentrations toxic effects may manifest few hours after exposure. The symptoms include headache, weakness, dizziness, dyspnea, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and bronze skin. Chronic exposure can produce jaundice, hemolytic anemia and hemoglobinuria. PEL-TWA and TLV-TWA 0.05 ppm or 0.2 mg/m3 (OSHA and ACGIH). 

I Substance for which the TLV is higher than the OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) and/or the NIOSH Recommended Exposure Limit (REL),... 

The OSHA sets safe and healthy workplace standards. When OSHA was formed, they adopted the then current ACGIH TLV - TWAs and TLV-Cs as occupational exposure limits and made them federal standards. However, instead of calling them TLV -TWAs, OSHA called them PELs. OSHA has both TWA and ceiling values for various chemicals. PELs are listed in Title 29 of the Code of Eederal Regulations (CER), Part 1910, Subpart Z, General Industry Standards for Toxic and Hazardous Substances. Emergency responders should understand that ACGIH and OSHA values are not always the same for each chemical. 

Administration (OSHA) permissible exposure limit (PEL) and the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) threshold limit value (TLV) are 5 pg m for oil mists. 

Inhalation data, PEL, TWA, TLV, STEL, and IDLH data are generally presented in units of parts per million (ppm), parts per billion (ppb), or milligrams per cubic meter (mpcm) of air. MCL data are generally presented in milligrams or micrograms per liter of water. 

---