Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Pearson diagram

Ax) and the average, h, of the principal quantum number, n, of the valence electrons on the A, B atoms. Two of these Mooser Pearson diagrams are shown in Figures 8 and 9. Notice that for the AB octets such indices sort the structures of the three different coordination number structures from each other well, and also separate the wurtzite structure from the sphalerite structure. The wurtzite structure is found for the more ionic examples. [Pg.4591]

Paper [84] discusses the solution of this equation in the form of the sum of independent solutions with discrete spectra. Special cases of monodisperse and uniform over some interval of initial distributions are examined. On the basis of the obtained solutions, the first four moments of the volume distribution of drops are found, and a Pearson diagram (see Fig. 11.1) is used to show that the solution converges to a lognormal distribution. It is consistent with the result of [86], where it was supposed that breakage frequency /(V) is constant and does not depend on the size of drops. [Pg.345]

One has to assume that an anionic tetrahedron complex is formed and one has to make also assumptions which of the elements are the cations C, the central atoms C and the anions A. The parameters used in the Mooser - Pearson diagrams to separate compounds with adamantane structure from those having no adamantane structures are also here of some relevance, if the central atom and the anion is from the second period of the Periodic Table then a planar trianguleir anion complex is preferred to a tetrahedron complex, as for example with BOs) -, (003)2- or (NOs) -. Tetrahedral complexes are also rarely found if the central atom is from a very high period. Central atoms from periods inbetween can be expected to form tetrahedral complexes, but there are exceptions. [Pg.197]

W. Hume-Rothery, ]. W. Christian and W. B. Pearson, Metallurgical Equilibrium Diagrams, Institute of Physics, 1952. [Pg.320]

Behrmann, G., Larsen, K.G., Pearson, J., et al. (1999) Efficient Timed Reachability Analysis Using Clock Difference Diagrams. Proceedings of CAV 99, Springer, Berlin, pp. 341-353. [Pg.234]

Hume-Rothery, W., Christian, J.W. and Pearson, W.B. (1953) Metallurgical Equilibrium Diagrams, The Institute of Physics (Chapman Hall Ltd., London). [Pg.77]

Figure 4.24. Near-neighbour diagrams for binary phases calculated according to Pearson (1972) for a few structural types. The lines calculated for the different interatomic contacts are shown. The numbers of contacts X-Y, Y-X, X-X, etc. are indicated. The experimental values determined for the various compounds are contained, for each structure type, within the hatched fields, (a) XY3 compounds belonging to the cP4-AuCu3 structural type (b) XY2 Taves phases of the cF24-Cu2Mg type (c) XY compounds of the cF8-ZnS structural type. Notice the importance of the high coordination contacts in the more metallic phases, whereas in the ZnS-type compounds the role of the chemical bond factor is clearly relevant. Figure 4.24. Near-neighbour diagrams for binary phases calculated according to Pearson (1972) for a few structural types. The lines calculated for the different interatomic contacts are shown. The numbers of contacts X-Y, Y-X, X-X, etc. are indicated. The experimental values determined for the various compounds are contained, for each structure type, within the hatched fields, (a) XY3 compounds belonging to the cP4-AuCu3 structural type (b) XY2 Taves phases of the cF24-Cu2Mg type (c) XY compounds of the cF8-ZnS structural type. Notice the importance of the high coordination contacts in the more metallic phases, whereas in the ZnS-type compounds the role of the chemical bond factor is clearly relevant.
Notice that the aforementioned compositional scheme is a necessary condition for building the tetrahedral structures, but not every compound that fulfils this condition is a tetrahedral compound. The influence of other parameters, such as the electronegativity difference, has been pointed out. By means of diagrams, such as that reported by Mooser and Pearson (1959) (average principal quantum number vs. electronegativity difference) the separation of tetrahedral structures from other structures can be evidenced. [Pg.265]

Figure 1.6 Molecular orbital diagram for the hydrogen molecule, Ha. Reprinted, by permission, from R. E. Dickerson, H. B. Gray, and G. P. Haight, Jr., Chemical Principles, 3rd ed., p. 446. Copyright 1979 by Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 1.6 Molecular orbital diagram for the hydrogen molecule, Ha. Reprinted, by permission, from R. E. Dickerson, H. B. Gray, and G. P. Haight, Jr., Chemical Principles, 3rd ed., p. 446. Copyright 1979 by Pearson Education, Inc.
Figure 8.6 Schematic diagram of the Wu et al. apparatus. (From H. Frauenfelder and E. M. Henley, Subatomic Physics, 2nd Edition. Copyright 1991 by Prentice-Hall, Inc. Reprinted by permission of Pearson Prentice-Hall.) A polarized nucleus emits electrons with momenta pt and P2 that are detected with intensities Ii and 72. The left figure shows the normal situation while the right figure shows what would be expected after applying the parity operator. Parity conservation implies the two situations cannot be distinguished experimentally (which was not the case). Figure 8.6 Schematic diagram of the Wu et al. apparatus. (From H. Frauenfelder and E. M. Henley, Subatomic Physics, 2nd Edition. Copyright 1991 by Prentice-Hall, Inc. Reprinted by permission of Pearson Prentice-Hall.) A polarized nucleus emits electrons with momenta pt and P2 that are detected with intensities Ii and 72. The left figure shows the normal situation while the right figure shows what would be expected after applying the parity operator. Parity conservation implies the two situations cannot be distinguished experimentally (which was not the case).
Figure 23. Experimental values of 1 - T Gasb as a function of xs along several isotherms in the Al-Ga-Sb system. The calculation used the recommended value of ftcasb in Table I and the phase diagram measurements of Dedegkaev et al. (145) ( , 778 K 0, 825 K A, 873 K) and of Cheng and Pearson (182) (O, 773 K , 823 K). Figure 23. Experimental values of 1 - T Gasb as a function of xs along several isotherms in the Al-Ga-Sb system. The calculation used the recommended value of ftcasb in Table I and the phase diagram measurements of Dedegkaev et al. (145) ( , 778 K 0, 825 K A, 873 K) and of Cheng and Pearson (182) (O, 773 K , 823 K).
Some years ago in a continuing effort to understand phase diagrams, I had discovered [3] the following empirical rules among more than 300 binary phase diagrams reported in the literature (Hansen, Elliot Shunk) [4,5,6], The metallic radii, Ra, Rb, used are from INTERATOMIC DISTANCES (The Chemical Society, London, 1958) [7] and the structural notation follows that described in Handbook of Lattice Spacing and Structure of Metals (Pearson, 1958) [8]).. [Pg.14]

Figure 1.38 Schematic diagram of the mechanism of oxidation of copper (a) Diffusion ot lu ions from the metal to the air/oxide interface via cation vacancies (b) reaction ot oxygen molecules with Cu+ ions at the air/oxide interface (c) diffusion of positive charge inwards to neutralize the excess of electrons in the metal. (Reproduced from Corrosion for Science and Engineering, Tretheway and Chamberlain, Copyright Pearson Education Ltd)... Figure 1.38 Schematic diagram of the mechanism of oxidation of copper (a) Diffusion ot lu ions from the metal to the air/oxide interface via cation vacancies (b) reaction ot oxygen molecules with Cu+ ions at the air/oxide interface (c) diffusion of positive charge inwards to neutralize the excess of electrons in the metal. (Reproduced from Corrosion for Science and Engineering, Tretheway and Chamberlain, Copyright Pearson Education Ltd)...
Figure 1.68 E-pH diagram for iron in water. (Reproduced from Corrosion for Science and Engineering, Tretheway and Chamberlain, Copyright Pearson Education Ltd)... Figure 1.68 E-pH diagram for iron in water. (Reproduced from Corrosion for Science and Engineering, Tretheway and Chamberlain, Copyright Pearson Education Ltd)...
The metallicity defined here, as well as the simpler earlier form, corresponds roughly to the metallization introduced earlier by Mooscr and Pearson (1959). It is also the parameter (based upon earlier values) that formed the ordinate in the schematic phase diagram shown in Fig. 2-6. [Pg.89]

An extensive compilation of nitride phases is contained in Pearson s handbook and in the ASM binary phase diagram compilation. ... [Pg.3006]

Figure 43 CHf versus cnj isotope diagrams for lithospheric mantle peridotite minerals. Kaapvaal peridotite data are ah garnets and clinopyroxenes (Simon et al, 2002). Slave peridotite data are garnets and whole rocks from Schmidberger et al (2002). Salt Lake Crater peridotites (Hawaii), Kilboume Hole and Abyssal peridotites, are from Salters and Zindler (1995). Siberian and Mongohan peridotite Held are chnopyroxene data from cratonic and off-craton peridotites (field taken from Ionov and Weis, 2002). Fields for MORE (N-MORB) and OIB are from Nowell et al (1998). Field for Beni Bousera peridotites from Pearson and Noweh (2003). Figure 43 CHf versus cnj isotope diagrams for lithospheric mantle peridotite minerals. Kaapvaal peridotite data are ah garnets and clinopyroxenes (Simon et al, 2002). Slave peridotite data are garnets and whole rocks from Schmidberger et al (2002). Salt Lake Crater peridotites (Hawaii), Kilboume Hole and Abyssal peridotites, are from Salters and Zindler (1995). Siberian and Mongohan peridotite Held are chnopyroxene data from cratonic and off-craton peridotites (field taken from Ionov and Weis, 2002). Fields for MORE (N-MORB) and OIB are from Nowell et al (1998). Field for Beni Bousera peridotites from Pearson and Noweh (2003).
Figure 38 Path diagram describing the structure of the relationship between decomposition rate constants (k) and climate (AET) and litter quality (lignin/N ratio) for first-year decomposition from 44 locations. Numbers in bold type are the Pearson correlation coefficients among variables and the numbers in parentheses partition the coefficients into direct and indirect effects of the predictor variables (AET and lignin/N) (source Aerts, 1997). Figure 38 Path diagram describing the structure of the relationship between decomposition rate constants (k) and climate (AET) and litter quality (lignin/N ratio) for first-year decomposition from 44 locations. Numbers in bold type are the Pearson correlation coefficients among variables and the numbers in parentheses partition the coefficients into direct and indirect effects of the predictor variables (AET and lignin/N) (source Aerts, 1997).
FIGURE 5-4 Block diagram of U.S. baseline incineration system. SOURCE Pearson and Magee, 2002. [Pg.80]


See other pages where Pearson diagram is mentioned: [Pg.307]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.622]    [Pg.712]    [Pg.728]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.852]    [Pg.914]    [Pg.937]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.21]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.307 ]




SEARCH



Mooser-Pearson diagram

Pearson

© 2024 chempedia.info