Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interfacial partitioning

In the second picture, an interfacial layer or region persists over several molecular diameters due to a more slowly decaying interaction potential with the solid (note Section X-7C). This situation would then be more like the physical adsorption of vapors (see Chapter XVII), which become multilayer near the saturation vapor pressure (e.g.. Fig. X-15). Adsorption from solution, from this point of view, corresponds to a partition between bulk and interfacial phases here the Polanyi potential concept may be used (see Sections X-7C, XI-1 A, and XVII-7). [Pg.390]

In addition to lowering the interfacial tension between a soil and water, a surfactant can play an equally important role by partitioning into the oily phase carrying water with it [232]. This reverse solubilization process aids hydrody-namically controlled removal mechanisms. The partitioning of surface-active agents between oil and water has been the subject of fundamental studies by Grieser and co-workers [197, 233]. [Pg.485]

Condition (273) is the requirement that at the center of the bubble the concentrations and the temperature must be finite, and condition (274) follows from the condition that the net average flux is zero on the surface r = b which encloses each bubble. Condition (275) refers to the interfacial concentrations and the temperature on both phases, which are related through known equilibrium partition coefficients mf. Hence... [Pg.383]

After phase separation, two sets of equations such as those in Table A-1 describe the polymerization but now the interphase transport terms I, must be included which couples the two sets of equations. We assume that an equilibrium partitioning of the monomers is always maintained. Under these conditions, it is possible, following some work of Kilkson (17) on a simpler interfacial nylon polymerization, to express the transfer rates I in terms of the monomer partition coefficients, and the iJolume fraction X. We assume that no interphase transport of any polymer occurs. Thus, from this coupled set of eighteen equations, we can compute the overall conversions in each phase vs. time. We can then go back to the statistical derived equations in Table 1 and predict the average values of the distribution. The overall average values are the sums of those in each phase. [Pg.178]

The solubilization of amino acids in AOT-reversed micelles has been widely investigated showing the importance of the hydrophobic effect as a driving force in interfacial solubihzation [153-157]. Hydrophilic amino acids are solubilized in the aqueous micellar core through electrostatic interactions. The amino acids with strongly hydrophobic groups are incorporated mainly in the interfacial layer. The partition coefficient for tryptophan and micellar shape are affected by the loading ratio of tryptophan to AOT [158],... [Pg.488]

The investigations of interfacial phenomena of immiscible electrolyte solutions are very important from the theoretical point of view. They provide convenient approaches to the determination of various physciochemical parameters, such as transfer and solvation energy of ions, partition and diffusion coefficients, as well as interfacial potentials [1-7,12-17]. Of course, it should be remembered that at equilibrium, either in the presence or absence of an electrolyte, the solvents forming the discussed system are saturated in each other. Therefore, these two phases, in a sense, constitute two mixed solvents. [Pg.29]

The properties of these systems depend strongly on the interfacial potentials created at the interface. They arise from oriented molecular dipoles, from ionization of the surfactant hydrophylic groups, and from the partition and adsorption of ions presented in the environment. [Pg.35]

Although the Lewis cell was introduced over 50 years ago, and has several drawbacks, it is still used widely to study liquid-liquid interfacial kinetics, due to its simplicity and the adaptable nature of the experimental setup. For example, it was used recently to study the hydrolysis kinetics of -butyl acetate in the presence of a phase transfer catalyst [21]. Modeling of the system involved solving mass balance equations for coupled mass transfer and reactions for all of the species involved. Further recent applications of modified Lewis cells have focused on stripping-extraction kinetics [22-24], uncatalyzed hydrolysis [25,26], and partitioning kinetics [27]. [Pg.335]

A comprehensive study of the complex interfacial processes involved in the solvent extraction of cupric ion by oxime ligands represents one of the most detailed and successful studies carried out with the RDC [37,38]. Recently, the technique was also used to study the transfer of tetrabutylammonium cations [43] and the kinetics of partitioning of compounds between octanol and water [44]. In the latter study, Fisk and coworkers investigated the rates of partitioning of 23 compounds from octanol to an aqueous phase. The RDC arrangement used most frequently in this work is of the o/o/w type. So according to Eq. (15), and can be calculated from the gradient and intercept of... [Pg.340]

FIG. 4 Thermodynamic equilibria for the interfacial distribution of a solute X which can be ionized n times, and X being its most acidic (or deprotonated) and its most basic (or protonated) forms, respectively. X and are the dissociation constants in the aqueous and organic phase, respectively, and P is the partition coefficient of the various species between the two phases. [Pg.734]

The only potential that varies significantly is the phase boundary potential at the membrane/sample interface EPB-. This potential arises from an unequal equilibrium distribution of ions between the aqueous sample and organic membrane phases. The phase transfer equilibrium reaction at the interface is very rapid relative to the diffusion of ions across the aqueous sample and organic membrane phases. A separation of charge occurs at the interface where the ions partition between the two phases, which results in a buildup of potential at the sample/mem-brane interface that can be described thermodynamically in terms of the electrochemical potential. At interfacial equilibrium, the electrochemical potentials in the two phases are equal. The phase boundary potential is a result of an equilibrium distribution of ions between phases. The phase boundary potentials can be described by the following equation ... [Pg.641]

The C-Type isotherm indicates partitioning mechanisms whereby adsorptive ions or molecules are distributed or partitioned between the interfacial phase and the bulk solution phase without any specific bonding between the adsorbent and the adsorbate. [Pg.130]

The impact of salt concentration on the formation of micelles has been reported and is in apparent accord with the interfacial tension model discussed in Sect. 4.1, where the CMC is lowered by the addition of simple electrolytes [ 19,65, 280,282]. The existence of a micellar phase in solution is important not only insofar as it describes the behavior of amphipathic organic chemicals in solution, but the existence of a nonpolar pseudophase can enhance the solubility of other hydrophobic chemicals in solution as they partition into the hydrophobic interior of the micelle. A general expression for the solubility enhancement of a solute by surfactants has been given by Kile and Chiou [253] in terms of the concentrations of monomers and micelles and the corresponding solute partition coefficients, giving... [Pg.145]

Figure 2.10 Scheme showingthe Donnan partition of mobile ions between the solution and a polymeric phase bearing an excess of negative charges. While positive ions are incorporated in the film to mantain electroneutrality, negative ions are excluded from it. This situation give rise to an interfacial potential (Donnan potential) at the interface. [Pg.74]

From a survey of the literature in chemically modified electrodes [13], one can identify simple phenomenological models that have been very successful for the analysis of a particular aspect of the experimental data. Such models are, for instance, the Dorman partition model [24, 122], the Laviron [158], Albery [159] and Anson models [127] to account for the nonideal peak width, the Smith and White model for the interfacial potential distribution [129], and so on. Most of these models contain one or more adjustable parameters that give some partial information about the system. For example, the lateral interaction model proposed by Anson [127] provides a value for the lateral interactions between oxidized and reduced sites, but does not explain the origin of the interactions, neither does it predict how they depend on the experimental conditions or the polymer structure. In addition, none of these models provide information on the interfacial structure. [Pg.96]

Case 4 The interfacial partition between the two phases of unchanged species is fast. The rate is controlled by the diffusion to and away from the interface of the partitioning species. In the absence of an interfacial resistance, the partition equilibrium of A between the aqueous and organic phase, occurring at the interface, can be always considered as an instantaneous process. Here, A is any species, neutral or charged, organic or inorganic. This instantaneous partition process (interfacial equilibrium) is characterized by a value of the partition coefficient equal to that measured when the two phases are at equilibrium. [Pg.241]


See other pages where Interfacial partitioning is mentioned: [Pg.149]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.614]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.682]    [Pg.712]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.527]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.476]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.29]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.88 ]




SEARCH



Interfacial potential difference partition equilibrium

© 2024 chempedia.info