Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Particle size distribution by sedimentation

According to ASTM D 422 (2007) (AASHTO T 88 2013), materials passing through a 2.0 mm sieve are separated. A mass of test portion of approximately 100 g, if sandy soil is used, or 50 g, if clay and silt size, is placed in a 250 ml beaker. The sample is covered with 125 ml of stock solution (sodium hexametaphosphate solution, 40 g/L), stirred until is thoroughly wetted and allowed to soak for at least 12 or 16 h. At the end of soaking, the contents of the beaker are washed into a dispersion cup using distilled or demineralised water and dispersed for a period of 60 s in a mechanical stirring apparatus. An alternative air-jet method may be used for dispersion. [Pg.8]

Immediately after dispersion, the soil-water slurry is transferred to the sedimentation cylinder, water is added until the total volume is 1000 ml and the contents are shaken by [Pg.8]

After the last hydrometer reading is taken, transfer the suspension to a 0.075 mm sieve and wash with tap water until the wash water is clear. The material retained on the 0.075 mm sieve is transferred into a suitable container and dried in an oven at 110 C. The dried material, together with the portion retained on the 2.0 mm sieve, is sieved using the desired set of sieves. This sieving provides the gradation curve of the soil fraction 0.075 mm. [Pg.8]

The gradation curve of the material passing through the 0.075 mm sieve, that is, the particle size distribution, is determined from the hydrometer readings according to Stock s law. Details for determining the particles diameter can be found in ASTM D 422 (2007) or AASHTO T 88 (2013). [Pg.8]

The two gradations obtained are combined and presented as a final result. [Pg.8]


JIS Z8820 General Rules for the Determination of Particle Size distribution by Sedimentation in Liquid, 360... [Pg.389]

Schure, M.R. Barman, B.N. Giddings, J.C. Deconvolution of nonequilibrium band broadening effects for accurate particle size distributions by sedimentation field-flow fractionation. Anal. Chem. 1989, 61, 2735. [Pg.2457]

The particle size deterrnined by sedimentation techniques is an equivalent spherical diameter, also known as the equivalent settling diameter, defined as the diameter of a sphere of the same density as the irregularly shaped particle that exhibits an identical free-fall velocity. Thus it is an appropriate diameter upon which to base particle behavior in other fluid-flow situations. Variations in the particle size distribution can occur for nonspherical particles (43,44). The upper size limit for sedimentation methods is estabHshed by the value of the particle Reynolds number, given by equation 11 ... [Pg.131]

ISO/WD 13317-1 Determination of Particle Size Distribution by Gravitational Liquid Sedimentation Methods- Part I (1996) General Principles and Guidelines, 360... [Pg.389]

Other samples of alkaline slurry were subjected to particle size analysis by sedimentation. With the —43 xm + 1.2 [im fraction this analysis was done in a 50-mm-diameter settling column of dilute slurry with a tared pan at the base to record continuously the mass of sedimented solid. The data were analyzed by the method of Oden (8), and the particle size distribution (Stokesian diameter), expressed on a mass percent basis, was calculated. [Pg.313]

Brown, C. Particle Size Distribution by Centrifugal Sedimentation, /. Phys. Chem, 1944, 48, 246. [Pg.320]

Determination of particle size distribution by gravitational sedimentation in a liquid and attenuation measurement Pore size distribution and porosity of solid materials - Evaluation by mercury porosimetry and gas adsorption International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, Bank,... [Pg.102]

S. Berg, Determination of Particle Size Distribution by Examining Gravitational and Centrifugal Sedimentation according to the Pipette Method and with Divers, ASTM, Special Technical Publication No. 234, 1958, pp. 143-171. [Pg.125]

Berg, S. Determination of particle size distribution by examining gravitational and centrifugal sedimentation to the pipett method and with divers. Symp. PSA, June 1958, Boston, ASTM STP 234 (1959), p. 143 - 171 /4/ Chung, H. S. Hogg, R. The effect of Brownian motion on particle size analysis by sedimentation. Powder Techn. 41 (1985) 3, p. 211 - 216 /5/ Allen, T. Sedimentation techniques of particle size measurement. Conf. PSA Sept. 1985, Bradford, Proceed, p. 24 - 45... [Pg.486]

In particle-size measurement, gravity sedimentation at low soHds concentrations (<0.5% by vol) is used to determine particle-size distributions of equivalent Stokes diameters ia the range from 2 to 80 pm. Particle size is deduced from the height and time of fall usiag Stokes law, whereas the corresponding fractions are measured gravimetrically, by light, or by x-rays. Some commercial instmments measure particles coarser than 80 pm by sedimentation when Stokes law cannot be appHed. [Pg.316]

Particle Size Distribution. Almost every feed slurry is a mixture of fine and coarse particles. Performance depends on the frequency of distribution of particle size ia the feed. Figure 5 shows that whereas all of the coarse particles having a diameter greater than some are separated, fewer of the very fine particles are, at any given feed rate. The size distribution frequency of particles ia feed and centrate for a fine and coarse feed are quite different. More coarse particles separate out than fine ones. Classification of soHds by size is often done by centrifugal sedimentation. [Pg.402]

Aerosol Dynamics. Inclusion of a description of aerosol dynamics within air quaUty models is of primary importance because of the health effects associated with fine particles in the atmosphere, visibiUty deterioration, and the acid deposition problem. Aerosol dynamics differ markedly from gaseous pollutant dynamics in that particles come in a continuous distribution of sizes and can coagulate, evaporate, grow in size by condensation, be formed by nucleation, or be deposited by sedimentation. Furthermore, the species mass concentration alone does not fliUy characterize the aerosol. The particle size distribution, which changes as a function of time, and size-dependent composition determine the fate of particulate air pollutants and their... [Pg.382]

Glassification. Classification (2,12,26,28) or elutriation processes separate particles by the differences in how they settle in a Hquid or moving gas stream. Classification can be used to eliminate fine or coarse particles, or to produce a narrow particle size distribution powder. Classification by sedimentation iavolves particle settling in a Hquid for a predetermined time to achieve the desired particle size and size distribution or cut. Below - 10 fim, where interparticle forces can be significant, gravitational-induced separation becomes inefficient, and cyclone and centrifugation techniques must be used. Classification also separates particles by density and shape. Raw material separation by differential sedimentation is commonly used in mineral processiag. [Pg.306]

Two-phase suspension systems produce beaded products with broader particle-size distribution (e.g., 1-50 /rm). The microspherical particles usually need to be classified repeatedly to reduce the particle-size distribution in order to improve the resolution and efficiency in the separation for use in chromatography. The actual classification process depends on the size range involved, the nature of the beaded product, and its intended applications. Relatively large (>50 /rm) and mechanically stable particles can be sieved easily in the dry state, whereas small particles are processed more conveniently in the wet state. For very fine particles (<20 /rm), classification is accomplished by wet sedimentation, countflow setting, countflow centrifugation, or air classification. [Pg.6]

Mechanical analyses determine the particle-size distribution in a soil sample. The distribution of coarse particles is determined by sieving, and particles finer than a 200 or 270-mesh sieve and found by sedimentation. [Pg.273]

Before beginning a size determination, it is customary to look at the material, preferably under a microscope. This examination reveals the approx size range and distribution of the particles, and especially the shapes of the particles and the degree of aggregation. If microscopic examination reveals that the ratios between max and min diameters of individual particles do not exceed 4, and indirect technique for particle size distribution based on sedimentation or elutria-tion may be used. Sedimentation techniques for particle size determination were first used by Hall (Ref 2) in 1904, He showed that the rate of fall of individual particles in a fluid was directly related to the particle size by the hydrodynamic... [Pg.497]

SHARPLESMICROMEROGRAPH- A commercially available air sedimentation device introduced in 1953 (Ref 6) that provides rapid particle size distribution determinations for powdered materials by the application of Stokes law for particles falling thru a static column of gas... [Pg.518]

CAHN RG ELECTROBALANCE/SEDIMENTATION ACCESSORY. This app produces a continuous, visible chart record of the sediment weight collected on the balance pan. It has been evaluated for measuring particle size distributions of the primary expls Lead Styphnate, Lead Azide, Tetracene by Hutchinson (Ref 41). [Pg.526]

A dispersion of the sample is placed on top of a liq of greater density. The rate of sedimentation is detd by measuring the sediment vol at fixed time intervals. The results are converted to a size distribution by Stoke s Law Nitrogen Adsorption. The amt of N adsorbed on a sample is detd by carefully measuring the press change of a known vol of N exposed to a known wt of dry mat at constant temp. The info is used to detn the surface area which is converted to a particle size distribution Turbidometric Methods. The absorption of a beam of light passing thru a suspended sample in a suitable liq is measured as a function of time. [Pg.625]

Model simulations of particle volume concentrations in the summer as functions of the particle production flux in the epilimnion of Lake Zurich, adapted from Weilenmann, O Melia and Stumm (1989). Predictions are made for the epilimnion (A) and the hypolimnion (B). Simulations are made for input particle size distributions ranging from 0.3 to 30 pm described by a power law with an exponent of p. For p = 3, the particle size distribution of inputs peaks at the largest size, i.e., 30 pm. For p = 4, an equal mass or volume input of particles is in every logaritmic size interval. Two particle or aggregate densities (pp) are considered, and a colloidal stability factor (a) of 0.1 us used. The broken line in (A) denotes predicted particle concentrations in the epilimnion when particles are removed from the lake only in the river outflow. Shaded areas show input fluxes based on the collections of total suspendet solids in sediment traps and the composition of the collected solids. [Pg.274]


See other pages where Particle size distribution by sedimentation is mentioned: [Pg.8]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.2259]    [Pg.2242]    [Pg.959]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.3556]    [Pg.488]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.409]   


SEARCH



Particle distribution

Particle size distribution

Particle sizing distribution

Particles sedimentation

Sedimentation particle size distribution

Sedimentation, particle size

Sedimentation, particle sizing

Size distribution by sedimentation

© 2024 chempedia.info