Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Packed column evaluation

For multicomponent systems try to apply component-specific detectors Favor measurement methods with packed columns Evaluate concentration range of the application process Check applicability of measurement method Determine single-component parameters first... [Pg.380]

With soft gels, column packing has often been plagued with such problems as inferior reproducibility and excessive time requirements. These problems are alleviated with physically stable Toyopearl HW media. However, an improperly packed column can have significantly reduced efficiency. The two key variables for the successful packing of Toyopearl HW media, packing velocity and column size, have been evaluated to determine the optimal packing conditions. [Pg.150]

Strigle [94] proposed this term to better describe the performance of a packed column at or near the previously described loading point. Kister [93] evaluated the limited published data and proposed using the MOC at 95% of the flood point. The flood point can be estimated by Equation 9-20 or from the plots in References 90 and 93. The data are reported to be within 15-20% of the prediction [93]. See Figure 9-22 for the identification of MOC on the HETP vs. Cg chart For more accurate information... [Pg.299]

Danckwerts et al. (D6, R4, R5) recently used the absorption of COz in carbonate-bicarbonate buffer solutions containing arsenate as a catalyst in the study of absorption in packed column. The C02 undergoes a pseudo first-order reaction and the reaction rate constant is well defined. Consequently this reaction could prove to be a useful method for determining mass-transfer rates and evaluating the reliability of analytical approaches proposed for the prediction of mass transfer with simultaneous chemical reaction in gas-liquid dispersions. [Pg.302]

Jedrzejewski and Taylor [408] have evaluated microbore pSFC-PB-MS. Microbore separations can take full advantage of the simple DFI design, and are still being pursued. Packed-column SFC-MS was recently reviewed [13]. The two techniques, cSFC and pSFC, are complementary compounds in complex mixtures may be more easily identified with cSFC-MS, while pSFC-MS may be more suitable for target component analysis. [Pg.482]

EPA. 1986b. Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry for semivolatile organics packed column technique. Method 8250. In Test methods for evaluating solid waste. Washington, DC U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, 1-30. [Pg.152]

Fehringer NV, Walters SM. 1986. Evaluation of capillary gas chromatography for pesticide and industrial chemical residue analysis II. Comparison of quantitative results obtained on capillary and packed columns. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 69 90-93. [Pg.135]

The optimized operating conditions for each analytical method including the detector system of choice are reported in Table II. The reported columns and operating conditions yield satisfactory peak shapes and resolution of all the potential interferents evaluated for HCCP and HCBD. Two potential interferents—tetrachloro-l,2-difluoroethane and 1,2-dichloroethane— could not be separated from 1,2-DCP with conventional packed columns. Tetrachloro-l,2-difluoroethane, a compound with physical properties similar to 1,2-DCP, is not likely to be found with... [Pg.51]

A preliminary investigation of SFC coupled to MS/MS for the analysis of trimethoprim, diethylstilbestrol, hexestrol, and dienestrol has demonstrated the considerable potential of this separation technique (81). Packed-column SFC has been also evaluated for the analysis of nine sulfonamides in swine kidney extracts... [Pg.679]

Separations were performed on either silica- or amino-bonded stationary phase columns, using carbon dioxide with various modifiers as mobile phases. Each column exhibited distinctly different selectivities to the examined sulfonamides, the amino-bonded column being much more sensitive to modifier variations. In a continuation of the sulfonamide study, packed-column SFC was further evaluated for possible application to the analysis of furazolidone, chloramphenicol, and lincomycin residues (82). Separation was effected on an amino-bonded stationary phase using carbon dioxide with methanol modifier as the mobile phase, whereas detection was accomplished by MS. [Pg.679]

The amount of resin to pack in a column, column geometry, flow rates, pressure, column hardware, and wetted materials of construction should all be evaluated in development. Chromatography columns must be properly packed prior to validating the purification process. From a business perspective there should be some criteria other than purification of the product by which the quality of the packed column can be assessed prior to applying the feedstream, which by this time in the process is quite expensive. Height equivalent to a theoretical plate (HETP) and asymmetry determinations can be used to evaluate the quality of column packing, but may have limited value for some types of packed columns... [Pg.264]

Roberts, RV., Hopkins, G.D., Munz, C., Riojas, A.H. (1985) Evaluating two-resistance models for air stripping of volatile organic contaminants in countercurrent, packed column. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19, 164—173. [Pg.338]

The official European Community (EC) method for determination of the purity of milk fat is based on triglyceride composition as determined by GC on a packed column (EC, 1999). This is based on a formula for the composition of genuine milk fat of the type 100 = 14.197 C40 — 36.396 C42 + 32.364 C44 — e. The limit of detection varies with the adulterant fat, but is usually <5% foreign fat. A standard reference material (CRM 519) is available (Precht el al., 1998) which has been fully characterized and the triglyceride composition determined collaboratively. Other methods of analysis of the triglyceride data have been evaluated (Collomb et al., 1998a,b Lipp, 1996a,b Ulberth, 1995). [Pg.129]

It should be emphasized that both k" and k" need to be evaluated under conditions used in the CEC experiments. First, the electrophoretic mobility of the sample component is obtained from separate CZE measurements using the mobile phase used in CEC. Then electroosmotic mobility, which is the interstitial EOF mobility in the packing, is evaluated from the results of measuring the currents and the EOF with CEC columns [9,10]. This allows for calculation of k" according to Eq. (16) followed by calculation of k" from Eq. (11) using the migration times of the different sample components in the CEC column. [Pg.10]

Another method to evaluate the EOF mobility in a packed column has also been proposed in the literature [31], The EOF mobility was expressed in terms similar to Eq. (1), and we obtain... [Pg.144]

Since the mobility in a packed capillary is dependent on both the zeta potential and the column structure, it is important to take into account of the column architecture when EOF mobility is evaluated. An expression for calculating the actual interstitial mobility for a solute in a packed column is [31,32]... [Pg.144]


See other pages where Packed column evaluation is mentioned: [Pg.615]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.1395]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.820]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.361]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.130 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.161 ]




SEARCH



Column evaluations

Column packing methods evaluation

Packed columns

Packed columns, packing

Preparation and Evaluation of Packed Columns

© 2024 chempedia.info