Overall Production Cost Comparison

However, once all factors are taken into account and a total production cost of hydrogen over the life of the plant is determined, the best economic solution may be replacing an Old Style hydrogen plant with a new Modem hydrogen plant. The following evaluation illustrates this potential. 

This evaluation could be done based on a variety of other plant configurations, but for demonstration purposes, this evaluation is limited to the plant types described. For comparison purposes, the cost of utilities will be based on the following  

As previously discussed, the utility costs of a hydrogen plant are among the most important economic factors in determining the overall production cost of hydrogen. Simulation models were built for both the Old Style and Modem plants to calculate utility costs. The Old Style plant utilities are based on a simulation model built to reflect t3 ical plant performance. The Modem plant utilities are based on a simulation model for the design of a t3 ical new plant. Table 10 shows the utilities and utility cost of hydrogen for each plant. 

---

Due to these advantages the overall production costs for the immobilised continuous process were found to be 40% lower than that of the batch process. In Figure A8.6 a comparison is given between the batch process costs and the continuous production costs. 

The market of PP/EPDM blends has grown dramatically because of its recycling abihty and processability by conventional thermoplastic processing equipment. The unique characteristics of thermoplastic elastomer made it an attractive alternative to conventional elastomers in a variety of markets. Liu et al. showed from the experimental blends (53) that materials cost reduction of between 30% to 50% is possible in comparison to commercial products if one applies the PP/EPDM blends to the construction of a basketball court, a tennis court, and a roller hockey rink, which were estimated around 7000, 14,000, and 40,000, respectively. The cost comparison took into account the percentage of rubber or PP used in experimental blend, the exponential factor for a scale-up process and the overall surface area of the specific applications. Among many possible application of this blend two readily feasible applications are roofing and flooring. 

A comparison of the performance of Co, modified Co, and modified Rh systems is given in Table 1. Clearly the Rh system outperforms Co both in terms of milder operating conditions and in overall efficiency to the desired product n-butyraldehyde and it is worth noting that catalyst costs make only a minor contribution to production costs (<0.5 c per lb butyraldehyde). Consequently all new butyraldehyde plants which have been installed recently have employed the Rh LPO process. When all current licensees plants are operational Rh catalysts will account for one third of butyraldehyde production worldwide. 

In high-volume production the lithium-based systems will compete directiy with mercury and silver systems on a cost per watt hour basis. Cost comparisons with alkaline systems will be marginal on a per watt hour basis, but cost advantages can be realized by considering the cost advantages of other systems with that achievable with a lithium power source. The increases in overall system cost effectiveness can be achieved as follows ... 

Cost-benefit analysis A quantitative evalnation and decision-making technique where comparisons are made between the costs of a proposed regulatory action on the nse of a substance or chemical with the overall benefits to society of the proposed action, often converting both the estimated costs and benefits into health and monetary units CPSC Consnmer Product Safety Commission... 

As most of the excavated uranium is subsequently used as nuclear fuel, the price of conversion of the ore (yellow cake) to UFg, the price of enrichment (separative work units—SWU), the cost of deconversion of the enriched UF to uranium oxide (or other chemical forms), and the production of fuel elements determine economic factors. In addition, the cost of electric power production by nuclear power plants in comparison with other plants (gas, coal, and oil) and the overall cost of disposal of the waste from all these processes will influence the worthiness of uranium extraction. In view of the rapid changes in the prices of these processes, it is difficult to assess the threshold concentration of uranium in the ore that will make mining viable economically. Furthermore, nations or organizations that cannot purchase uranium... 

---