Other Stochastic Models

Zaider and Brenner (1984) have developed computer code for fast chemical reactions on electron tracks Zaider et ah (1983) have performed MC simulation of 

FIGURE 7.4 Comparison of Monte Carlo (MC) and independent reaction time (RRT) simulations with respect to the product AB for a spur of two neutral radical-pairs. See text for explanation. From Clifford et al. (1986), by permission of The Royal Society of Chemistry  

Chapter 7 Spur Theory of Radiation Chemical Yields 

A great deal of work has been done by Hummel and co-workers on electron-ion recombination in hydrocarbon liquids using random flight MC simulation. This will be discussed in Sect. 7.5. 

Several authors have made restricted comparisons between experiment and calculations of diffusion theory. Thus, Turner et al. (1983, 1988) considered G(Fe3+) in the Fricke dosimeter as a function of electron energy, and Zaider and Brenner (1984) dealt with the shape of the decay curve of eh (vide supra). These comparisons are not very rigorous, since many other determining experiments were left out. Subsequently, more critical examinations have been made by La Verne and Pimblott (1991), Pimblott and Green (1995), Pimblott et al. (1996), and Pimblott and LaVeme (1997). These authors have compared their 

---

In a discrete system, ip will be a vector of values, one for each cell in the system. The values themselves might be vectors, so that is a vector of vectors. In a continuum system (p will be a function of x and sometimes also of t. Sometimes p will be a vector or tensor valued function and can be discontinuous. In computer simulation the continuum system is approximated by a discrete system. For the purposes of deterministic mathematical modelling, the properties are supposed given as specific vectors or functions. In stochastic modelling, properties are specified by probability density functions, or perhaps implicitly by some other stochastic model. 

Queueing Theory.14—Queueing theory occupies a prominent position in operations research because of a wide range of applications with possible transfer of the ideas to other fields, e.g., inventory, and for the use of sophisticated stochastic models.15... 

In summary, models can be classified in general into deterministic, which describe the system as cause/effect relationships and stochastic, which incorporate the concept of risk, probability or other measures of uncertainty. Deterministic and stochastic models may be developed from observation, semi-empirical approaches, and theoretical approaches. In developing a model, scientists attempt to reach an optimal compromise among the above approaches, given the level of detail justified by both the data availability and the study objectives. Deterministic model formulations can be further classified into simulation models which employ a well accepted empirical equation, that is forced via calibration coefficients, to describe a system and analytic models in which the derived equation describes the physics/chemistry of a system. 

It does not contain a probabilistic modeling component that simulates variability therefore, it is not used to predict PbB probability distributions in exposed populations. Accordingly, the current version will not predict the probability that children exposed to lead in environmental media will have PbB concentrations exceeding a health-based level of concern (e.g., 10 pg/dL). Efforts are currently underway to explore applications of stochastic modeling methodologies to investigate variability in both exposure and biokinetic variables that will yield estimates of distributions of lead concentrations in blood, bone, and other tissues. 

Stochastic Model The stochastic model, on the other hand, designates and describes the nondeterministic or stochastic (probabilistic) properties of the variables involved, particularly those representing the measurements. 

The Stochastic and other Statistical Models of Long-Range Order. 324... 

The greater number of folds in larger proteomes is intuitively obvious simply because the functioning of more complex organisms is expected to require a greater structural diversity of proteins. From a different perspective, the increase of diversity follows from a stochastic model, which describes a proteome as a finite sample from an infinite pool of proteins with a particular distribution of fold fractions ( a bag of proteins ). A previous random simulation analysis suggested that the stochastic model significantly (about twofold) underestimates the number of different folds in the proteomes (Wolf et al., 1999). In other words, the structural diversity of real proteomes does not seem to follow... 

Before leaving the topic of modelling, it is pertinent to note that, at room temperature, the deterministic model [9] and the stochastic model [10b] both predict that ca. 50% ofg(H2) comes from the sum of reactions (R4) and (R5), and negligible amounts from reaction (R6). The values for the deterministic model are given in Table 1. The corresponding values for the stochastic model are 0.24 and 0.15 molecules (100 eV) respectively [10,b,], and 0.28 and 0.14 molecules (100 eV) respectively [20]. On the other hand, g(H202) is predicted to be almost entirely accounted for by reactions (R8) and (R9) in both types of model. 

In this final section we shall outline a few examples of the application of stochastic models to systems of physical chemical interest. Two of these appear in the author s previous review67 but the others do not. These examples are chosen to be representative of the general approach. 

Since detailed discussions of solutions obtained to date and of procedures for obtaining them have been published previously,4,5 and since this article (like others in this volume) is based on the subject matter of a single oral presentation, only a brief review of treatments of the indicated stochastic models for these biopolymerizations will be given in the following discussion. 

In this Section we focus our attention on the development of the formalism for complex reactions with application to the formation of NH3. The results obtained (phase transition points and densities of particles on the surface) are in good agreement with the Monte Carlo and cellular automata simulations. The stochastic model can be easily extended to other reaction systems and is therefore an elegant alternative to the above-mentioned methods. 

The results obtained for the stochastic model show that surface reactions are well-suited for a description in terms of the master equations. Since this infinite set of equations cannot be solved analytically, numerical methods must be used for solving it. In previous Sections we have studied the catalytic oxidation of CO over a metal surface with the help of a similar stochastic model. The results are in good agreement with MC and CA simulations. In this Section we have introduced a much more complex system which takes into account the state of catalyst sites and the diffusion of H atoms. Due to this complicated model, MC and in some respect CA simulations cannot be used to study this system in detail because of the tremendous amount of required computer time. However, the stochastic ansatz permits to study very complex systems including the distribution of special surface sites and correlated initial conditions for the surface and the coverages of particles. This model can be easily extended to more realistic models by introducing more aspects of the reaction mechanism. Moreover, other systems can be represented by this ansatz. Therefore, this stochastic model represents an elegant alternative to the simulation of surface reaction systems via MC or CA simulations. 

A consequence of a strict stochastic model is that not all B lymphocytes will exhibit allelic exclusion. If the rate of productive rearrangement is sufficiently high, there will be occasional double producers (see related discussion in Part I, Instruction and Selection). On the other hand, if the rate of productive rearrangement is low, there will be few doubles, but many cells will have only non-functional rearrangements. 

Aside from the continuity assumption and the discrete reality discussed above, deterministic models have been used to describe only those processes whose operation is fully understood. This implies a perfect understanding of all direct variables in the process and also, since every process is part of a larger universe, a complete comprehension of how all the other variables of the universe interact with the operation of the particular subprocess under study. Even if one were to find a real-world deterministic process, the number of interrelated variables and the number of unknown parameters are likely to be so large that the complete mathematical analysis would probably be so intractable that one might prefer to use a simpler stochastic representation. A small, simple stochastic model can often be substituted for a large, complex deterministic model since the need for the detailed causal mechanism of the latter is supplanted by the probabilistic variation of the former. In other words, one may deliberately introduce simplifications or errors in the equations to yield an analytically tractable stochastic model from which valid statistical inferences can be made, in principle, on the operation of the complex deterministic process. 

Once a scaling model has been found the scaled data should be examined carefully to ascertain that the variance is equal over the domain of the data. If not then a suitable transform must be found to equalize the variance. Otherwise, no single stochastic model will accurately reflect the probability of an occurrence of the "event" in question over the data domain, much less for an extrapolated prediction. For example, if the standard deviation is proportional to the mean, a very common situation in nature, the variance is equalized by taking the log of the model variable. This is the case for both of the above examples, where the probability model was fitting to In x rather than x itself. Suitable transformations for other common situations, as well as a general method for finding transforms is given by Johnson Leone (7). 

How general are our results From a stochastic point of view ergodicity breaking, Levy statistics, anomalous diffusion, aging, and fractional calculus, are all related. In particular ergodicity breaking is found in other models with power-law distributions, related to the underlying stochastic model (the Levy walk). For example, the well known continuous time random walk model also... 

---