Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Observed response, analytical

Fig. 14. Errors when two species, and R, are deterrnined without correction for interference where (x) defines the caUbration curve for solutions containing analyte only represents the actual concentration of 2 calculated concentration represents the response resulting from represents the observed response and 2 Vi corresponds to the response resulting from the interference of B. Fig. 14. Errors when two species, and R, are deterrnined without correction for interference where (x) defines the caUbration curve for solutions containing analyte only represents the actual concentration of 2 calculated concentration represents the response resulting from represents the observed response and 2 Vi corresponds to the response resulting from the interference of B.
Before stepping through the several dimensions, it is worthwhile to examine the general analytical model which applies and, through that, consider the implications of the necessary assumptions in practical applications. To begin, let us express the observed response (y) and its error (e) in terms of the blank (B) and concentrations of all contributing analytes (xj). [Pg.52]

If the standard deviation of the observed response Oy is constant and if a 3 then an analytic solution can be given as follows. From Equations 5 and 6,... [Pg.59]

Multitarget forensic applications of HPLC for other drug classes are also available in the literature. Josefsson et al. [77] applied HPLC-MS-MS to the determination of 19 neuroleptics and their major metabolites in human tissues and body fluids. Optimal separation was achieved using a cyano column within a 9 min gradient run. Detection was curried out in SRM reaching LQDs down to the lower ng/mL level, although more than a 10-fold difference in signal response was observed between analytes. The method was subjected to partial validation only. [Pg.670]

Multiple measurements allow the analyst to detect the presence of an inter-ferent. For example, suppose an instrument outputs two responses for each sample, as shown in Figure 5-2. Assume the pure component response is obtained firom the measurement of a pure analyte of inteicst. Given any sample containing only this analyte, the same relative magnitudes for measurements and r, are observed. If the observed response shown in Figure 5.2 is encountered, the analyst will know that a problem exists. This concept similarly extends to mixtures. Tlie detection of interferents can fail if, for example, an inter-ferent has the same relative response on the two variables as one of the other species. However, the likelihood of this tjpe of failure decreases as the number of measurements increase, and as care is taken in choosing the measurements. [Pg.276]

Our task, to establish traceability, is then simplified. The results of the measurement Eq. (3) are directly traceable to the calibration solutions, because the regression coefficients Bq and Bi trace back to the analyte concentration of samples via the observed responses yobs of the analyte concentrations on calibration. Therefore, the proper execution of regression is a crucial condition for establishing the traceability. The regression model used has to be carefully selected and validated. [Pg.255]

Most chemometricians prefer inverse methods, but most traditional analytical chemistry texts introduce the classical approach to calibration. It is important to recognise that there are substantial differences in terminology in the literature, the most common problem being the distinction between V and y variables. In many areas of analytical chemistry, concentration is denoted by V, the response (such as a spectroscopic peak height) by y However, most workers in the area of multivariate calibration have first been introduced to regression methods via spectroscopy or chromatography whereby the experimental data matrix is denoted as 6X , and the concentrations or predicted variables by y In this paper we indicate the experimentally observed responses by V such as spectroscopic absorbances of chromatographic peak areas, but do not use 6y in order to avoid confusion. [Pg.5]

The lowest response region in the spectrum is that which has the LOD as the upper bound. It is clear that if a response that is smaller than the response associated with the LOD is observed, the analytical result should be reported as less than the LOD or not detected. In either case, the method s LOD must be reported [e.g., [Pg.1362]

Caution should be taken when applying these transcription based assays. First, the biomarkers introduced into cells may alter cell response. Second, if fluorescence biomarkers such as GFP are used, the analyte of interest should be examined for autofluoresce to determine the feasibility of using a cellular fluorescence assay for the resolution of small effects [76]. Furthermore the process of transcription and translation can introduce a time lag between exposure and observable responses. [Pg.716]

In the next sections, we describe the solution of the diffusion equations with the appropriate boundary conditions for electrode reactions with heterogeneous rate constants spanning a wide range, and we discuss the observed responses. An analytical approach based on an integral equation is used here, because it has been widely applied to these types of problems and shows directly how the current is affected by different experimen-... [Pg.227]

While drug concentrations are usually analytically quantified in plasma, serum, or blood, the magnitude of the observed response is determined by the concentration of the drug at its effect site, the site of action in the target tissue [6]. The relationship between the drug concentration in plasma and at the effect site may either be constant or undergo time-dependent changes. If equilibrium between both concentrations is rapidly achieved or the site of action is within plasma, serum or blood, there is practically a constant relationship... [Pg.162]

Exercise 7.9. Suppose that, in the membrane experiments, the observed response for the (1 1 1) ternary mixture had been 2.50 cm (average of two runs), instead of 3.50 cm. (a) Calculate the value of the 6 23 coefficient, (b) Using 0.056 cm as an estimate of the variance of the analytical signal, calculate the standard error of the new value of 6123-1 significant ... [Pg.328]

At this point we need a criterion in order to properly control the re-scaling procedure. In order to unveil this criterion we are looking back on differential electronegativity formula (4.275) that should be seen as the kernel function for the Mulliken electronegativity functional (4.279). If we observe the analytical places the introduced chemical response indices a, b and the chemical action index appear, respectively, it can be easily seen that only the chemical action is coupled with the total number of electrons in the concerned state. [Pg.283]

In general, optimum responses are obtained for species which are at a high concentration at the boundary and where electron transfer is rapid (reversible systems). This will result in well-defined responses with intensity proportional to analyte concentration (see Chapter 8). With CMEs similar processes occur, in that the analyte must be transported to the electron transfer boundary before the redox process occurs. However, the electron transfer boundary is not so clearly defined on CMEs as it is on conventional metal electrodes. If the modified sensor is coated with a material to occlude other species, then the movement of the analyte (Y) may also be hindered, as depicted in Figure 5.7(i). However, with such sensors electron transfer will usually occur at the metal substrate surface with the usual rate of electron transfer. If a catalytic CME is employed then a process as depicted in Figure 5.7(ii) may be observed. The analyte migrates to the electrode surface, in this case the modifier-solution boundary. The analyte may then be oxidized or reduced by the electrocatalyst according to ... [Pg.148]

Gas-Phase Sensing. In principle, both inorganic and organic analytes are subject to detection. Figure 63 provides an example of results obtained from the novel 155 MHz piezoelectric quartz microbalance (QMB) resonator used to detect gaseous tetrachloroethylene (C2CI4). The used absorption layer was polyepichlorhydrin (PECH). Observed response curves are illustrated as a func-... [Pg.1023]


See other pages where Observed response, analytical is mentioned: [Pg.179]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.872]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.2030]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.1191]    [Pg.5548]    [Pg.647]    [Pg.2405]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.528]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.393]   


SEARCH



Analytical response

Observed response, analytical model

© 2024 chempedia.info