Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Nuisance public

Public nuisance Public nuisance is the interference with the lawful activities of Her Majesty s subjects or a substantial section of them. One person cannot suffer a public nuisance. Public nuisance is a crime and is actionable by the Attorney General or (under Section 2.2.2 of the Local Government Act 1972) by the local authority. There is no prescriptive right to commit a public nuisance. [Pg.759]

The Safe Drinking Water Act protects the quality of drinking water in the IJ.S. This law focu.ses on all waters actually or potentially designated for drinking use, whether above or below ground. The Act authorized EPA to establish safe standards of purity and required all owners or operators of public water systems to comply with primary (health-related) standards. State governments, that assume this power from EPA, also encourage attainment of secondary standards (nuisance-related). [Pg.26]

Public nuisance from boiler blow-down indicates collectors are needed. [Pg.233]

Collection equipment expensive but public nuisance complaints becoming more frequent. [Pg.233]

Most cupolas still have no collectors but air pollution and public nuisance emphasis is creating greater interest in control equipment. [Pg.233]

Collection equipment installed primarily to prevent public nuisance. [Pg.233]

It must be positioned such as not to pollute any water sources or cause a public nuisance ... [Pg.27]

New furnaces have to be constructed (as far as is practicable) so as to operate smokelessly. Chimney heights are controlled (see below). Smoke Control Orders can be introduced (to control domestic smoke) and grants are available to convert fireplaces to burn authorized fuels. Smoke (other than dark smoke, which is already controlled) is dealt with by Section 16 of the 1956 Act and is, for the purposes of Part 111 of the 1936 Public Health Act, to be considered as a statutory nuisance. [Pg.755]

Part III re-enacted the law on statutory nuisance with changes to the Public Health Act 1936, controls over offensive trades being transferred to Part 1. [Pg.355]

Many malodorous compoimds are not only nuisance, but also a health threat under prolonged exposure [1]. Ammonia (NH3) is emitted from landfill and sewage treatment plant and associated with many agricultural activities (e.g. poultry and piggery). Ammonia is also a problem in public toilets, hospitals and nursing homes. Selective eatalytie oxidation (SCO) can convert NH3 to N2 at mild temperature (i.e. 473-673 K) as shown in equation 1, however nitrous oxides (N2O) and nitrogen oxides (NOj) are often produced cf. Eqn. 2 3). [Pg.289]

Facilities will be required at all sites for the disposal of waste materials without creating a public nuisance see Section 14.6.1. [Pg.902]

Elevated flares with excessive light, noise, or odors a possible public nuisance in some situations and locales. [Pg.87]

Similarly, the words vagrant and homeless have the same denotative meaning. However, vagrant connotes a public nuisance, whereas homeless suggests an unfortunate situation worthy of attention and assistance. [Pg.96]

In the area of agriculture and food industry as well as the public sewage plants there are increasingly problems because of odour nuisance in the neighbourhood. The substances emitted from the different processes are seldom noxious. They are many individual components of very low concentration which together result in a specific odourous mixture. And this is felt to be penetrating and intolerable. This refers in particular to odours from... [Pg.265]

Water Reclamation Works by their very nature can, at times be the source of unpleasant odorous emission. The odour-intensive compounds (osmogenes) which make up these emissions are believed to arise mainly as the decomposition products of carbohydrates and proteins. The breakdown of this waste material proceeds by aerobic and anaerobic processes at various stages of the treatment plant. Atmospheric pollution of this nature frequently results in complaints from members of the public either resident, or perhaps employed in the vicinity of such works. In order to confirm or deny that a reclamation works is responsible for a particular nuisance and, if possible to identify the causal agents it was decided that the Authority should have the capability of analysing for odorous and other polluting constituents of the atmosphere. This paper describes the progress made towards this objective and summarises the experience gained with a procedure in use. There are two principle approaches available for the analytical classification of odorous emissions -... [Pg.322]

In many states, regulations only require that hospital incinerators not create a public nuisance usually recognized as odors and smoke opacity. Disposal costs for these medical wastes are becoming stiffer, just as surely as they are for infectious and other hazardous/toxic wastes. This adds another incentive to incinerate. It may be possible that a good deal of hospital waste could be separated, reduced, and recycled. While infectious waste is obviously not recyclable, the amount of waste designated infectious can be greatly reduced by separating materials to avoid excess contamination [74]. [Pg.82]

One characteristic of the civil justice system is that it is decentralized Different courts can and do come to different conclusions. In 2002, in the case of Cincinnati v. Beretta the Ohio State Supreme Court ruled that plaintiffs had adequately demonstrated that the availability of guns to criminals caused by negligent marketing represented a substantial danger to the community—a major public nuisance. [Pg.31]

Although a variety of claims were discussed at various stages in the litigation, the most important questions were Is the manufacmrer liable for negligence because of the way guns are being sold Is there a public nuisance for which the city can collect compensation ... [Pg.91]

There are many conflicting opinions in state courts regarding suits against gun manufacturers. In Spitzer v. Sturm, Ruger Co. (2003) the New York Supreme Court rejected a similar public nuisance claim. The court noted that firearms were already heavily regulated and that legislatures were much more suited than courts to deal with the problems caused by guns. [Pg.92]

That last sentence meant that the NAACP had failed one of the requirements of New York s law of public nuisance. [Pg.93]

June 21 New %rk becomes the first state to sue gun manufacturers, based on a new state law that declares illegal guns to be a public nuisance. More than 30 cities and counties are already suing gun makers under a negligence theory. [Pg.109]


See other pages where Nuisance public is mentioned: [Pg.127]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.2266]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.463]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.655]    [Pg.759]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.220]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.820 ]




SEARCH



Nuisance

© 2024 chempedia.info