Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Nucleosome-remodeling complexes

Santisteban, M.S., Kalashnikova, T., and Smith, M.M. (2000) Histone H2A.Z regulates transcription and is partially redundant with nucleosome remodeling complexes. Cell 103, 411 22. [Pg.200]

Cairns, B.R., Schlichter, A., Erdjument-Bromage, H., Tempst, P., Kornberg, R.D., and Winston, F. (1999) Two functionally distinct forms of the RSC nucleosome-remodeling complex, containing essential AT hook, BAH, and bromodomains. Mol. Cell 4, 715-723. [Pg.453]

Koyama, H., Itoh, M., Miyahara, K., and Tsuchiya, E. (2002) Abundance of the RSC nucleosome-remodeling complex is important for the cells to tolerate DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 531, 215-221. [Pg.460]

Ng, H.-H., Robert, F., Young, R.A., and Struhl, K. (2002) Genome-wide location and regulated recruitment of the RSC nucleosome-remodeling complex. Genes Dev. 16, 806-819. [Pg.461]

Sudarsanam, P, and Winston, E. (2000). The Swi/Snf family Nucleosome-remodeling complexes and transcriptional control, Trends Genet. 16, 345-351. [Pg.37]

Chromatin is composed of nucleosomes, where each comprise 147 base pairs of DNA wrapped around an octamer oftwo copies of each histone H2A, H2B, H3, and H4. Nucleosomes are folded into higher-order structures that are stabilized by linker histones. Chromatin structure can be altered by enzymes that posttranslationally modify histones (e.g., through phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation, or ubiquitination) or by ATP-driven chromatin-remodeling complexes that alter nucleosome position and/or composition. [Pg.362]

Becker PB, Horz W (2002) ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling. Annu Rev Biochem 71 247-273 Bochar DA, Wang L, Beniya H, Kinev A, Xue Y, Lane WS, Wang W, Kashanchi F, Shiekhattar R (2000) BRCAl is associated with a human SWl/SNF-related complex linking chromatin remodeling to breast cancer. Cell 102 257-265... [Pg.41]

Durr H, Korner C, Muller M, Hickmann V, Hopfner KP (2005) X-ray structures of the Sulfolobus solfataricus SW12/SNF2 ATPase core and its complex with DNA. Cell 121 363-373 Eberharter A, Becker PB (2004) ATP-dependent nucleosome remodelling factors and functions. J Cell Sci 117 3707-3711... [Pg.41]

Luger K, Richmond TJ (1998) DNA binding within the nucleosome core. Curr Opin Struct Biol 8 33-40 MacCallum DE, Losada A, Kobayashi R, Hirano T (2002) ISWl remodeling complexes in Xenopus egg extracts identification as major chromosomal components that are regulated by INCENP-aurora B. Mol Biol Cell 13 25-39... [Pg.42]

Figure 1. Schematics of the effect of mH2A on transcription, (a) The mobiUzation of conventional promoter nucleosome by the chromatin remodeling complex generated a nucleosome-free promoter, which allowed the binding of the transcription factors and transcription to proceed, (b) MacroH2A nucleosome cannot be mobilized by die chromatin remodeling complex and die transcriptions factors are unable to bind macroH2A nucleosome containing promoter, which results in inhibition of the initiation of transcription. (See Colour Plate 8.)... Figure 1. Schematics of the effect of mH2A on transcription, (a) The mobiUzation of conventional promoter nucleosome by the chromatin remodeling complex generated a nucleosome-free promoter, which allowed the binding of the transcription factors and transcription to proceed, (b) MacroH2A nucleosome cannot be mobilized by die chromatin remodeling complex and die transcriptions factors are unable to bind macroH2A nucleosome containing promoter, which results in inhibition of the initiation of transcription. (See Colour Plate 8.)...
Figure 2. Effect of H2A.Bbd on transcription. The presence of H2A.Bbd confers lower stability and more loose structure to the nucleosomes, which allows the transcription factors binding to this variant nucleosome and thereby recruitment of p300 and acetylation of the promoter proximal histones. The remodeling complex can not mobilize the variant nucleosome, but instead helps in the removal of H2A.Bbd-H2B dimer. All these events facilitate transcription. (See Colour Plate 9.)... Figure 2. Effect of H2A.Bbd on transcription. The presence of H2A.Bbd confers lower stability and more loose structure to the nucleosomes, which allows the transcription factors binding to this variant nucleosome and thereby recruitment of p300 and acetylation of the promoter proximal histones. The remodeling complex can not mobilize the variant nucleosome, but instead helps in the removal of H2A.Bbd-H2B dimer. All these events facilitate transcription. (See Colour Plate 9.)...
In yeast, H2A.X is dephosphorylated by the phosphatase PPH3p after it has been released from chromatin. The release of y-H2A.X from repaired chromatin is independent of DNA replication, and it therefore must be assumed that a chromatin remodeling complex actively exchanges 7-H2A.X from nucleosomes. Thus far, several candidate remodeling complexes have been identified that specifically target nucleosomes containing 7-H2A.X. [Pg.101]

In addition to a potential role of HMGB proteins in nucleosome assembly, it has recently become apparent that many chromatin remodeling complexes either contain, or can associate with, a polypeptide containing an HMG-box homologous to the HMGBl B domain (Table 2). Examples of such complexes include the BAF (a mammalian SWI/SNF related complex [106]) and the Drosophila BRM (brahma)... [Pg.115]

Fig. 4. Possible mechanism for HMGB proteins in facilitating the unwrapping of nucleosomal DNA. The model postulates that the binding of an HMGB protein at an exit/entry point for the wrapped DNA increases the accessibility of the wrapped DNA both at the exit/entry points adjacent to the bound HMGB protein and also at internal positions. Such a conformational change would facilitate the binding both of sequence-specific regulatory proteins and of remodeling complexes. Adapted from Ref. [119] with permission. Fig. 4. Possible mechanism for HMGB proteins in facilitating the unwrapping of nucleosomal DNA. The model postulates that the binding of an HMGB protein at an exit/entry point for the wrapped DNA increases the accessibility of the wrapped DNA both at the exit/entry points adjacent to the bound HMGB protein and also at internal positions. Such a conformational change would facilitate the binding both of sequence-specific regulatory proteins and of remodeling complexes. Adapted from Ref. [119] with permission.

See other pages where Nucleosome-remodeling complexes is mentioned: [Pg.1228]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.1228]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.1228]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.1228]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.117]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.158 , Pg.159 , Pg.160 , Pg.161 , Pg.162 ]




SEARCH



History of Nucleosome-Remodeling Complexes

Nucleosome

Nucleosome remodeling

Nucleosome remodelling

Nucleosomes

Remodel

Remodelling

Remodelling complex

© 2024 chempedia.info