Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Normal stress differences rule

For systems where the stress-optical rule applies, birefringence measurements offer several advantages compared with mechanical methods. For example, transient measurements of the first normal stress difference can be readily obtained optically, whereas this can be problematic using direct mechanical techniques. Osaki and coworkers [26], using a procedure described in section 8.2.1 performed transient measurements of birefringence and the extinction angle on concentrated polystyrene solutions, from which the shear stress and first normal stress difference were calculated. Interestingly, N j was observed to... [Pg.195]

Rheological Properties of Molten Blends. The dependence of shear viscosity, first normal stress difference or storage modulus on blend composition varies very substantially from system to system. According to the type of relation between the logarithm of viscosity and concentration, blends were classified into four categories (291-293). Additive blends fulfill the log-additivity rule ... [Pg.6286]

The rheological responses measured at low values of strain better reflect the effects of the blend structure. For multiphase systems, there are serious disagreements between the predictions of continuum-based theories and experiments, that is, between the small and large deformation behavior. For example, the identity of zero-deformation rate dynamic and steady state viscosity is seldom found, and so is the Trouton rule. Similarly, the derived by Cogswell, relationship between the extensional viscosity and the capillary entrance pressure drop, and derived by Tanner equation for calculating the first normal stress difference from the extrudate swell, are rarely valid. [Pg.134]

It was pointed out in Section 10.4.3 that wall slip can cause a large error in the determination of the strain in step-strain experiments, and the true strain maybe much less than the nominal strain inferred from the displacement of a rheometer surface. The observation that N /a is independent of time does not, by itself, imply that there is no slip unless this ratio is also equal to the nominal strain applied. And when the Lodge-Meissner rule is not obeyed, it is often taken as evidence that slip is occurring, and the stress ratio Nj/cris used in place of the nominal strain as the independent variable in reporting shear stress and normal stress difference data [40]. [Pg.349]

Whenever it is applicable, such a comparison can lead to a considerable widening of the shear rate range, this is especially interesting in the case of normal stresses which are generally difficvilt to measiu on a broad window of rates. However, significant differences were noted in the case of LD preventing the use of the previous rule and any enlargement of the data set. [Pg.163]

Its validity at normal temperatures was shown for more than 60 materials, ranging from pure metals to glassy polymers. Obviously, the polymers of the present study are good examples for Barker s rule. The product ot2E is linked to the difference of the two heat capacities c0 and cE, measured under constant stress and under constant strain, respectively [58], Also, a2E is linked to the difference of two Young s moduli Es, and ET measured adiabatically and isothermally [59]. [Pg.333]

FIGURE 73.2 Examples of different types of assessments that can be performed by combining performance capacity measures and reference values of different types. The upper section shows raw score values as well as statistics for a healthy normal reference population in tabular form (left). It is difficult to reach any decision by simple inspection of just the raw performance capacity values. Tabular data are used to obtain a percent normal assessment middle) and a z-score assessment right). Both of these provide a more directly interpretable result regarding subject A s impairments. The lower section shows raw score values (same as in upper section) and quantitative demands (typically worst case) imposed on the respective performance resources by task X. The lower-middle plot illustrates the process of individually assessing sufficiency of each performance resource in this task context using a threshold rule (i.e., availability must exceed demand for sufficiency). The lower-right plot illustrates a similar assessment process after computation of a stress metric for each of the performance capacities. Here, any demand that corresponds to more than a 100% stress level is obviously problematic. [Pg.1203]

We can identify a third category called reduced. This is mainly used to indicate the stress level of syllables containing the schwa vowel. Reduced vowels occur in at least three subtly different cases. First, some words naturally, or always, have a schwa in a certain position, for example in the first syllable of machine / m ax sh iy n/. But consider the second syllable of information. We have given this a schwa in our annotation and most speakers would agree with this pronunciation. Now consider the word inform, /ih n f ao r m/, here the second syllable is a normal full vowel. We can say that information is created from inform by the application of morphological rules, and in the process, the second syllable has been reduced from a full vowel to a schwa. A third form of reduction occurs in function words, when for instance a word such as (from, / f r ah m/ is produced as /f r ax m/ in many instances. Finally, when people speak quickly, they often under-articulate vowels, which leads to a loss of distinction in their identity leaving them sounding like a schwa. This effect is also termed reduction. The number 0 is used to represent a reduced vowel, so the full transcription for information is /ih2 f axO r m ey2 sh axO n/... [Pg.188]

Furthermore, the relation between stresses and plastic strain rates must be unique. From this, it can be seen that the yield surface must be strictly convex and continuously differentiable to allow the formulation of a flow rule. The Tresca yield criterion is not continuously differentiable (there is no unique normal vector at its corners), and on the surfaces, different stress states fulfil equation (3.42) for a given Therefore, a flow rule cannot be derived using this criterion. [Pg.96]


See other pages where Normal stress differences rule is mentioned: [Pg.168]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.1295]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.168]   


SEARCH



Normal stress

Normal stress differences

Normalization rule

© 2024 chempedia.info