Non-reward

There remains the question of how nature can inflict pain on an organism that can control its own reinforcement. Modern operant theory has corrected many of the awkward features of older, two-factor theories of punishment (Hermstein 1969) it portrays pain as simple non-reward, to which an organism attends because it contains adaptive information. However, pain cannot be just the absence of reward or. in terms of the model just presented, the absence of effective rationing devices for self-reward. The person in pain is not just bored, as he would be in a stimulus deprivation situation, but feels attacked by a process that prevents him from enjoying food, entertainment or whatever other sources of reward may be available. And yet the person must perform a motivated act, the direction of his attention to the pain, in order for it to have its effect. As we have seen, pain can be and sometimes is deliberately shut out of consciousness. How does nature get people to open their gates to pain ... 

Horvitz JC (2000) Mesolimbocortical and nigrostriatal dopamine responses to salient non-reward events. Neuroscience 90(4) 651 656. 

Consider your own experience with task teams, both within your company and in other contexts such as industry associations, professional committees, or even non-professionai groups such as volunteer or community organizations. Review what worked and didn t work, what you liked and didn t like, and what you found rewarding or frustrating about each experience. This simple exercise helps identify potential pHMIs as well as successful techniques for managing a task team. 

Given the low incidence of severe withdrawal symptoms and the modest effects on the mesolimbic dopamine (reward) system, most investigators have found that cannabis has a low abuse or addiction potential. However, it has been argued that if cannabis is a non-addictive substance, why is its use so widespread and why are there so many longterm and heavy users Finally, contrary to the evidence that cannabis can produce chronic tolerance, some regular users report that they require less drug to achieve the same high, or sensitisation (Chapter 3). Three possible explanations may account for this. First, chronic users may focus on the effects that they wish to achieve. Second, the... 

Inhaled nicotine is efficiently delivered to the brain (see chapter by Benowitz, this volume) where it selectively interacts with its central targets, the neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). The multiple subtypes of uAChR (see chapter by Collins et al, this volume) all bind nicotine but with different affinities, depending on the subunit composition of the uAChR. Binding may result in activation or desensitisation of uAChRs, reflecting the temporal characteristics of nicotine dehvery and local concentration of nicotine. Another level of complexity of the actions of nicotine reflects the widespread and non-uniform distribution of uAChR subtypes within the brain, such that nicotine can influence many centrally regulated functions in addition to the reward systems. In this chapter, we address the consequences of nicotine interactions with nAChRs at the molecular, cellular and anatomical levels. We critically evaluate experimental approaches, with respect to their relevance to human smoking, and contrast the acute and chronic effects of nicotine. 

Carr GD, PhtUips AG, et al (1988) Independence of amphetamine reward from locomotor stimulation demonstrated by conditioned place preference. Psychopharmacology 94(2) 221-226 Chaudhri N, Caggiula AR, et al (2005) Sex differences in the contribution of nicotine and non-pharmacological stimuh to nicotine setf-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology 180(2) 258-266... 

Whatever you do, do not drug test Respect the privacy of your employees lifestyle, and do it with pride. Some companies that do not drug test post bulletins around the workplace which proudly state the companies privacy policy. Also, be sure to reward yourself by adding your company to The Non-Testers List for free advertizing and positive publicity. 

Opioids have been shown to increase the release of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens but they also subserve reinforcement in animals by a non-dopaminergic mechanism (Di Chiara 8c North,1992 Koob, 1992). Physiologically the opioid system appears to be largely involved in the con-sumatory rewards of feeding, drinking, sexual and maternal behaviour (Koob, 1992 Di Chiara 8c North, 1992) and certain types of social behaviour (Panksepp, 1981 Bolles 8c Fanselow, 1982). 

---