Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Nickel catalysts sulfur poisoning

Poisons for the nickel catalyst are sulfur, arsenic, chlorides or other halogens, phosphates, copper and lead. A 15 percent nickel catalyst is poisoned at 775°C if the gas contains as little as 0.005 percent (50 ppm) sulfur. [Pg.68]

Poisons for the nickel catalyst are sulfur, arsenic, chlorides or other halogens, phosphates. and copper or lead. A 15 percent nickel catalyst is poisoned at 775°C, should the gas contain 0.005 percent sulfur. This is equivalent to reaction of all the nickel on the surface of the crystallites 1 micron in diameter. For lower operating temperatures, the amount required for poisoning is even lower. When using naphtha as a feedstock, 0.5 ppm of sulfur (w/w) in the naphtha is the maximum allowed concentration for operation at 775°C. [Pg.1076]

A selective poison is one that binds to the catalyst surface in such a way that it blocks the catalytic sites for one kind of reaction but not those for another. Selective poisons are used to control the selectivity of a catalyst. For example, nickel catalysts supported on alumina are used for selective removal of acetjiene impurities in olefin streams (58). The catalyst is treated with a continuous feed stream containing sulfur to poison it to an exacdy controlled degree that does not affect the activity for conversion of acetylene to ethylene but does poison the activity for ethylene hydrogenation to ethane. Thus the acetylene is removed and the valuable olefin is not converted. [Pg.174]

Figure 8.3.1 is a typical process diagram for tlie production of ammonia by steam reforming. Tlie first step in tlie preparation of tlie synthesis gas is desulfurization of the hydrocarbon feed. Tliis is necessary because sulfur poisons tlie nickel catalyst (albeit reversibly) in tlie reformers, even at very low concentrations. Steam reforming of hydrocarbon feedstock is carried out in tlie priiiiiiry and secondary reformers. [Pg.260]

This paper surveys the field of methanation from fundamentals through commercial application. Thermodynamic data are used to predict the effects of temperature, pressure, number of equilibrium reaction stages, and feed composition on methane yield. Mechanisms and proposed kinetic equations are reviewed. These equations cannot prove any one mechanism however, they give insight on relative catalyst activity and rate-controlling steps. Derivation of kinetic equations from the temperature profile in an adiabatic flow system is illustrated. Various catalysts and their preparation are discussed. Nickel seems best nickel catalysts apparently have active sites with AF 3 kcal which accounts for observed poisoning by sulfur and steam. Carbon laydown is thermodynamically possible in a methanator, but it can be avoided kinetically by proper catalyst selection. Proposed commercial methanation systems are reviewed. [Pg.10]

Nickel. As a methanation catalyst, nickel is presently preeminent. It is relatively cheap, it is very active, and it is the most selective to methane of all the metals. Its main drawback is that it is easily poisoned by sulfur, a fault common to all the known active methanation catalysts. The nickel content of commercial nickel catalysts is 25-77 wt %. Nickel is dispersed on a high-surface-area, refractory support such as alumina or kieselguhr. Some supports inhibit the formation of carbon by Reaction 4. Chromia-supported nickel has been studied by Czechoslovakian and Russian investigators. [Pg.23]

Sulfur. It is not readily predictable from existing thermodynamic data that sulfur would be a poison of nickel catalysts. The action of sulfur is undoubtedly through the reaction of hydrogen sulfide with nickel, according to ... [Pg.25]

It was shown in laboratory studies that methanation activity increases with increasing nickel content of the catalyst but decreases with increasing catalyst particle size. Increasing the steam-to-gas ratio of the feed gas results in increased carbon monoxide shift conversion but does not affect the rate of methanation. Trace impurities in the process gas such as H2S and HCl poison the catalyst. The poisoning mechanism differs because the sulfur remains on the catalyst while the chloride does not. Hydrocarbons at low concentrations do not affect methanation activity significantly, and they reform into methane at higher levels, hydrocarbons inhibit methanation and can result in carbon deposition. A pore diffusion kinetic system was adopted which correlates the laboratory data and defines the rate of reaction. [Pg.56]

Catalyst Poisons. It is well known that sulfur, chlorine, etc. are strong poisons for nickel catalyst. Chlorine was not detectable in the synthesis gas downstream of the Rectisol in the SASOL plant. The total sulfur content of this gas—in the form of H2S, COS, and organic sulfur components—averaged 0.08 mg/m3 with maximum values of 0.2 mg total sulfur/m3. [Pg.128]

These tests demonstrated that the Lurgi Rectisol process provides an extremely pure synthesis gas which can be charged directly to the metha-nation plant without problems of sulfur poisoning of the nickel catalyst. However, in order to cope with a sudden sulfur breakthrough from Rectisol as a result of maloperation, a commercial methanation plant should be operated with a ZnO emergency catchpot on line. [Pg.129]

Sulfur poisons catalytic sites in the fuel cell also. The effect is aggravated when there are nickel or iron-containing components including catalysts that are sensitive to sulfur and noble metal catalysts, such as found in low temperature cell electrodes. Sulfur tolerances are described in the specific fuel cell sections of this handbook." In summary, the sulfur tolerances of the cells of interest, by percent volume in the cleaned and altered fuel reformate gas to the fuel cells from published data, are ... [Pg.206]

The most selective and widely used catalyst is palladium, usually on an alumina support. A bimetallic palladium catalyst has also been developed.310 Palladium is more selective and less sensitive to sulfur poisoning than are nickel-based catalysts. Additionally, sulfides can also be employed. [Pg.664]

Acetylene hydrogenation. Selective hydrogenation of acetylene to ethylene is performed at 200°C over sulfided nickel catalysts or carbon-monoxide-poisoned palladium on alumina catalyst. Without the correct amount of poisoning, ethane would be the product. Continuous feed of sulfur or carbon monoxide must occur or too much hydrogen is chemisorbed on the catalyst surface. Complex control systems analyze the amount of acetylene in an ethylene cracker effluent and automatically adjust the poisoning level to prepare the catalyst surface for removing various quantities of acetylene with maximum selectivity. [Pg.98]

On nickel catalysts, which have been extensively studied (12-14), McCarty and Wise (14) showed that in a temperature range from 373 to 873 K, sulfur coverage of nearly half a monolayer can be reached with H2S partial pressures as low as 1-10 ppb. Such results, indicating that the equilibrium H2S <= H2(g) + S(a) is totally displaced toward the right side, show the very high affinity of sulfur for transition metals and thus the difficulties in avoiding sulfur poisoning in metallic catalysis. [Pg.281]

Moreover, for coverage close to 1, a sudden decrease of the adsorption enthalpy (Fig. 1) can be explained by adsorption of species such as HS or undissociated H2S. A study of the nickel-sulfur interactions shows that the adsorbed state is energetically more stable than the bulky Ni3S2 sulfide (14). The same result was found for Ir catalysts (15). This shows that the contact of a metal with H2S will lead to a widely covered surface without any sulfur dissolution in the metal. The chemisorption energies of sulfur were also defined on Pt (16), Ir (15), Ru (17), and Fe and Co (18). For example, in the case of Pt, which is known as more resistant than Ni to sulfur poisoning, sulfur is weakly chemisorbed (16). [Pg.281]

A supported nickel catalyst (containing 20 to 25 weight percent Ni on a porous silica particle) is typically used. The pores allow access of the reactants to the extended pore surface, which is in the range of 200 to 600 m2/g (977 x 103 to 2931 x 103 ft2/lbm) of which 20 to 30 percent is catalytically active. The concentration of catalyst in the slurry can vary over a wide range but is usually under 0.1% Ni. After the reaction is complete, the catalyst can be easily separated from the product. Catalysts are subject to degradation and poisoning particularly by sulfur compounds. Accordingly, 10 to 20 percent of the recovered catalyst is replaced by fresh catalyst before reuse. Other catalysts are applied in... [Pg.55]

The dramatic increase in irreversible CO adsorption on presulfided supported nickel catalysts at moderate pressures (162) has significant, practical implications in regard to the use of CO chemisorption to measure nickel dispersion. For example, it is often desirable to determine nickel surface areas for catalysts used in a process where sulfur impurities are present in the reactants. Substantial differences in the measurements of nickel surface area by H2 or CO adsorption are possible depending upon the catalyst history and choice of adsorption conditions. In view of the ease with which catalysts may be poisoned by sulfur contaminants at extremely low concentrations in almost any catalytic process, and since large CO uptakes may be observed on supported Ni not necessarily representative of the unpoisoned nickel surface area, the use of CO adsorption to measure nickel surface areas is highly questionable under almost any circumstance. [Pg.183]

Sulfur poisoning is a key problem in hydrocarbon synthesis from coal-derived synthesis gas. The most important hydrocarbon synthesis reactions include methanation, Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, and methanol synthesis, which occur typically on nickel, iron, or cobalt, and ZnO-Cu catalysts, respectively. Madon and Shaw (2) reviewed much of the early work dealing with effects of sulfur in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Only the most important conclusions of their review will be summarized here. [Pg.189]

Rostrup-Nielsen and Pedersen (209) recently studied sulfur poisoning of supported nickel catalysts in both methanation and Boudouard reactions by means of gravimetric and differential packed-bed reactor experiments. In their gravimetric experiments a synthesis mixture (H2/CO/He = 5/7/3) containing 1-2 ppm H2S was passed over a catalyst pellet of 13% Ni/Al203-MgO at 673 K and 1 atm. The rates of Boudouard and methanation reactions were determined from weight increases and exit methane concentrations respectively. In the presence of 2 ppm H2S a factor of 20 decrease was observed in both methanation and Boudouard rates over a period of 30-60 min. However, the selectivity or ratio of the rates for Boudouard and methanation reactions was constant with time. From these results the authors concluded that the methanation and Boudouard reactions involve the same intermediate, carbon, and that sulfur blocks the sites for the formation of this intermediate. [Pg.200]


See other pages where Nickel catalysts sulfur poisoning is mentioned: [Pg.242]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.874]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.196]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.211 , Pg.226 ]




SEARCH



Catalyst poison

Catalyst sulfur

Catalysts catalyst poisoning

Catalysts poisoning

Catalysts sulfur poisoning

Nickel catalyst poisoning

Poisoned catalysts

Sulfur nickel

Sulfur nickel catalyst

Sulfur poison

Sulfur poisoning

Sulfur-poisoned catalysts

© 2024 chempedia.info