Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Neutral lipid bilayers

For measurements between crossed mica cylinders coated with phospholipid bilayers in water, see J. Marra andj. Israelachvili, "Direct measurements of forces between phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine bilayers in aqueous electrolyte solutions," Biochemistry, 24, 4608-18 (1985). Interpretation in terms of expressions for layered structures and the connection to direct measurements between bilayers in water is given in V. A. Parsegian, "Reconciliation of van der Waals force measurements between phosphatidylcholine bilayers in water and between bilayer-coated mica surfaces," Langmuir, 9, 3625-8 (1993). The bilayer-bilayer interactions are reported in E. A. Evans and M. Metcalfe, "Free energy potential for aggregation of giant, neutral lipid bilayer vesicles by van der Waals attraction," Biophys. J., 46, 423-6 (1984). [Pg.351]

M. Mandu, E. Ruckenstein Free Energy and Thermal Fluctuations of Neutral Lipid Bilayers, LANGMUIR 17 (2001) 2455-2463. [Pg.325]

The dependence of the interaction force between two undulating phospholipid bilayers and of the root-mean-square fluctuation of their separation distances on the average separation can be determined once the distribution of the intermembrane separation is known as a function of the applied pressure. However, most of the present theories for interacting membranes start by assuming that the distance distribution is symmetric, a hypothesis invalidated by Monte Carlo simulations. Here we present an approach to calculate the distribution of the intermembrane separation for any arbitrary interaction potential and applied pressure. The procedure is applied to a realistic interaction potential between neutral lipid bilayers in water, involving the hydration repulsion and van der Waals attraction. A comparison with existing experiments is provided. [Pg.348]

It is clear that the DLVO theory is incomplete, a simple example being the stability of neutral lipid bilayers,9 or of the water films involving nonionic surfactants,10 where there is no double layer to provide the required repulsion. Another example is provided by the specific ion effects, namely, the different behaviors of systems immersed in different electrolytes of the same valence. Various electrolytes have been classified long ago by Hofmeister in an... [Pg.352]

Whereas the corrections to the traditional Poisson— Boltzmann approach could explain many experimental results, there are systems, such as the vesicles formed by neutral lipid bilayers in water, for which an additional force is required to explain their stability.4 This force was related to the organization of water in the vicinity of hydrophilic surfaces therefore it was called hydration force .5... [Pg.486]

M. Manciu, E. Ruckenstein On possible microscopic origins of the swelling of neutral lipid bilayers induced by simple salts JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE 309 (2007) 56-67. [Pg.511]

It is well-known that free films of water stabilized by surfactants can exist as somewhat thicker primary films, or common black films, and thinner secondary films, or Newton black films. The thickness of the former decreases sharply upon addition of electrolyte, and for this reason its stability was attributed to the balance between the electrostatic double-layer repulsion and the van der Waals attraction. A decrease in its stability leads either to film rupture or to an abrupt thinning to a Newton black film, which consists of two surfactant monolayers separated by a very thin layer ofwater. The thickness of the Newton black film is almost independent of the concentration of electrolyte this suggests that another repulsive force than the double layer is involved in its stability. This repulsion is the result of the structuring of water in the vicinity of the surface. Extensive experimental measurements of the separation distance between neutral lipid bilayers in water as a function of applied pressure1 indicated that the hydration force has an exponential behavior, with a decay length between 1.5 and 3 A, and a preexponential factor that varies in a rather large range. [Pg.532]

On possible microscopic origins of the swelling of neutral lipid bilayers... [Pg.542]

While Korrcman and Posselt already suggested that the decrease in Hamaker constant, because of electrolyte screening, might be responsible for the swelling of neutral lipid bilayers by salts [ 11 ], an accurate test of this hypothesis has been carried out only recently by Petrache et al. [13,14]. Upon addition of 1 M of KC1 or KBr, the repeat distance in DLPC (a 12 carbon-chain lipid, l,2-dilauroyl-,vn-glyccro-3-phosphocholinc) bilayers has increased, at 25 °C, from 58 A, to 68 and 74 A, respectively [13]. These increases correspond to increases in the... [Pg.543]

The second issue is the extent of the decrease of the van der Waals interaction. Experiment and calculation of the van der Waals interactions between polystyrene latex beads and either a bare glass plane or a polystyrene coated glass plane [17] revealed that the Hamaker constant decreases only by about 25% at complete screening, while the experiments of Petrache et al. for neutral lipid bilayers require a decrease of about 75% (from 1.2kT to OAkT). Such a strong decrease of the van der Waals interaction upon addition of salt would be expected to have strong consequences in the general theory of colloid stability, and not only in the stability of lipid bilayers. [Pg.544]

The forth issue is the increase in the repulsion between bilayers at short distances. In Fig. 1, the osmotic pressure is plotted as a function of separation distance (data from Ref. [13]) for no added salt, for l M KC1 and for 1 M KBr. They reveal an increase in repulsion at short separation distances upon addition of salt. While the relatively small difference between 1 M KC1 and 1 M KBr can be attributed to the charging of the neutral lipid bilayers by the binding of Br (but not C.1-) [14], the relatively large difference between no salt and 1 M KCl is more difficult to explain. Even a zero value for the Hamaker constant (continuous line (2) in Fig. 1), in the 1 M KCl case, is not enough to explain the increase in repulsion, determined experimentally. The screening of the van der Waals interaction, at distances of the order of three Debye-Hiickel lengths (about 10 A) should lead, according to Petrache et al. calculations, to a decrease of only about 30% of the Hamaker constant (from 1.2kT to about 0.8kT, see Fig. 5C of Ref. [14]). Therefore, an additional mechanism to increase the hydration repulsion or the undulation force (or both) upon addition of salt should exist to explain the experiments. [Pg.544]

For the interaction potentials provided by Eqs. (12) and (13) and various values of Kc, the average separation as a function of the external pressure is compared in Fig. 5 with experiment (Ref. [13]) for neutral lipid bilayers at different salt concentrations. Note that the force due to the confinement of the undulation is not simply additive to the other interactions (hydration... [Pg.548]

One interesting questions is why the membranes never collapses, even when the undulations might drive part of than at separations less than 1 A. One possible explanation is provided by the strong, hard-wall like, Bom repulsion between the surface dipoles and their bound water molecules. Another possible explanation is that the polar headgroups of the neutral lipid bilayers, being hydrophilic, are more closely related to water than to the hydrocarbon region of the bilayers. Therefore, the van da Waals interaction between neutral bilayas might be betta described by [16] ... [Pg.548]

Hydration forces between neutral lipid bilayers independence of electrolyte concentration. 117... [Pg.573]

The force between neutral surfaces (with a surface dipole density) depends on the electrolyte concentrations, as shown in Fig. 3b, particularly at large separations. However, at small separations, the interaction appears to be well described by an exponential with a decay length AH. For neutral lipid bilayers, the equilibrium is reached at a distance of about 20 A, at which the attractive van der Waals interaction balances the repulsive hydration and thermal undulation interactions [43], The experiments regarding the forces between neutral lipid bilayers [11] sample the interactions at separations smaller than 20 A, for which the dependence on ionic strength is much weaker. By adding to the total pressure a typical van der Waals disjoining pressure [12] ... [Pg.581]

The largest possible value of A, in Eq. (14) is obtained when s" = 1 for all the dipoles within the cavity (no screening), which provides A, =14.9 A [30], and Eq. (19) leads to Xh 1-67 A. This value is comparable with the decay length of the hydration force measured in neutral lipid bilayers [10]. [Pg.599]


See other pages where Neutral lipid bilayers is mentioned: [Pg.325]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.487]    [Pg.487]    [Pg.492]    [Pg.495]    [Pg.497]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.525]    [Pg.527]    [Pg.543]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.547]    [Pg.549]    [Pg.571]    [Pg.573]    [Pg.582]    [Pg.584]    [Pg.586]    [Pg.594]    [Pg.594]    [Pg.594]    [Pg.595]    [Pg.595]    [Pg.595]    [Pg.596]   


SEARCH



Bilayer, lipidic

Lipid bilayer

Lipid bilayers

Lipids neutral

© 2024 chempedia.info