Network theory, rubber elasticity

Historically, the question of mechanism of elasticity has been one of evaluating the relative contributions of three different proposed mechanisms (1) the random chain network (classic rubber elasticity) theory, - (2) the solvent entropy theory, and (3) the damping of internal chain dynamics on extension. Ttie first is due to the Flory school the second was initiated by Weis-Fogh and Andersen, and the third is due to the present author and coworkers of the last quarter century. 

Key Words Crosslinked Rubber, Hory-Rehner Hypothesis, Gels, Networks, Polymer, Rubber Elasticity, Scaling Theory, Solution Thermodynamics, Swelling, Valanis-Landel Function. 

Prediction of the elastic properties of networks using rubber elasticity theory is based upon the knowledge of concentrations of elastically active network junctions (EANJs) and chains (EANCs), respectively and [260, 261]. EANJs are the intersection of at least three chains leading to the gel, whereas EANCs are the chains linking EANJs (see Figure 3.13). 

Masao Doi and Sam F. Edwards (1986) developed a theory on the basis of de Genne s reptation concept relating the mechanical properties of the concentrated polymer liquids and molar mass. They assumed that reptation was also the predominant mechanism for motion of entangled polymer chains in the absence of a permanent network. Using rubber elasticity theory, Doi and Edwards calculated the stress carried by individual chains in an ensemble of monodisperse entangled linear polymer chains after the application of a step strain. The subsequent relaxation of stress was then calculated under the assumption that reptation was the only mechanism for stress release. This led to an equation for the shear relaxation modulus, G t), in the terminal region. From G(t), the following expressions for the plateau modulus, the zero-shear-rate viscosity and the steady-state recoverable compliance are obtained ... 

Measurement of the rubbery plateau modulus ( ) provides a direct means by which to assess cross-link density in polymer networks. Classical rubber elasticity theory (Treloar, 1975 Mark, 1982 Hill, 1997) relates the elastic modulus in the rubbery region to effective cross-link density (v ) as shown, for example, in the equation suggested by Hill (1997) ... 

The effective molecular mass Mc of the network strands was determined experimentally from the moduli of the polymers at temperatures above the glass transition (Sect. 3) [11]. lVlc was derived from the theory of rubber elasticity. Mc and the calculated molecular mass MR (Eq. 2.1) of the polymers A to D are compared in Table 3.1. 

Although the basic concept of macromolecular networks and entropic elasticity [18] were expressed more then 50 years ago, work on the physics of rubber elasticity [8, 19, 20, 21] is still active. Moreover, the molecular theories of rubber elasticity are advancing to give increasingly realistic models for polymer networks [7, 22]. 

The bracket (1 — 2/f) was introduced into the theory of rubber elasticity by Graessley [23], following an idea of Duiser and Staverman [28]. Graessley discussed the statistical mechanics of random coil networks, which he had divided into an ensemble of micronetworks. 

According to the importance of the cross-links, various models have been used to develop a microscopic theory of rubber elasticity [78-83], These models mainly differ with respect to the space accessible for the junctions to fluctuate around their average positions. Maximum spatial freedom is warranted in the so-called phantom network model [78,79,83], Here, freely intersecting chains and forces acting only on pairs of junctions are assumed. Under stress the average positions of the junctions are affinely deformed without changing the extent of the spatial fluctuations. The width of their Gaussian distribution is predicted to be... 

The basic postulate of elementary molecular theories of rubber elasticity states that the elastic free energy of a network is equal to the sum of the elastic free energies of the individual chains. In this section, the elasticity of the single chain is discussed first, followed by the elementary theory of elasticity of a network. Corrections to the theory coming from intermolecular correlations, which are not accounted for in the elementary theory, are discussed separately. 

The size and shape of polymer chains joined in a crosslinked matrix can be measured in a small angle neutron scattering (SANS) experiment. This is a-chieved by labelling a small fraction of the prepolymer with deuterium to contrast strongly with the ordinary hydrogenous substance. The deformation of the polymer chains upon swelling or stretching of the network can also be determined and the results compared with predictions from the theory of rubber elasticity. 

The concept of affine deformation is central to the theory of rubber elasticity. The foundations of the statistical theory of rubber elasticity were laid down by Kuhn (JJ, by Guth and James (2) and by Flory and Rehner (3), who introduced the notion of affine deformation namely, that the values of the cartesian components of the end-to-end chain vectors in a network vary according to the same strain tensor which characterizes the macroscopic bulk deformation. To account for apparent deviations from affine deformation, refinements have been proposed by Flory (4) and by Ronca and Allegra (5) which take into account effects such as chain-junction entanglements. 

Until recently ( 1 5 ) investigations utilizing model networks had been limited to functionalities of four or less. Networks with higher functionality are predicted by the various theories of rubber elasticity to display unique equilibrium tensile behavior. As such, these multifunctional networks provide insight into the controversy surrounding these theories. The present study addresses the synthesis and equilibrium tensile behavior of endlinked model multifunctional poly(diraethylsilox-ane) (PDMS) networks. 

Classical molecular theories of rubber elasticity (7, 8) lead to an elastic equation of state which predicts the reduced stress to be constant over the entire range of uniaxial deformation. To explain this deviation between the classical theories and reality. Flory (9) and Ronca and Allegra (10) have separately proposed a new model based on the hypothesis that in a real network, the fluctuations of a junction about its mean position may may be significantly impeded by interactions with chains emanating from spatially, but not topologically, neighboring junctions. Thus, the junctions in a real network are more constrained than those in a phantom network. The elastic force is taken to be the sum of two contributions (9) ... 

To compare the predictions of the various molecular theories of rubber elasticity, three sets of high functionality networks were prepared and tested In this Investigation. The first set of networks tested were formed In bulk and attained a high extent of the endllnklng reaction, i.e., eX).9 where e Is the extent of reaction of the terminal vinyl groups. The second set of networks studied were formed In the presence of diluent and also achieved a high extent of reaction (e>0.9). The final group of experiments were performed on networks formed In bulk at low extents of reaction (0.4 [Pg.333]

For imperfect epoxy-amine or polyoxypropylene-urethane networks (Mc=103-10 ), the front factor, A, in the rubber elasticity theories was always higher than the phantom value which may be due to a contribution by trapped entanglements. The crosslinking density of the networks was controlled by excess amine or hydroxyl groups, respectively, or by addition of monoepoxide. The reduced equilibrium moduli (equal to the concentration of elastically active network chains) of epoxy networks were the same in dry and swollen states and fitted equally well the theory with chemical contribution and A 1 or the phantom network value of A and a trapped entanglement contribution due to the similar shape of both contributions. For polyurethane networks from polyoxypro-pylene triol (M=2700), A 2 if only the chemical contribution was considered which could be explained by a trapped entanglement contribution. 

Ronca and Allegra (12) and Flory ( 1, 2) assume explicitly in their new rubber elasticity theory that trapped entanglements make no contribution to the equilibrium elastic modulus. It is proposed that chain entangling merely serves to suppress junction fluctuations at small deformations, thereby making the network deform affinely at small deformations. This means that the limiting value of the front factor is one for complete suppression of junction fluctuations. 

The two-network method has been carefully examined. All the previous two-network results were obtained in simple extension for which the Gaussian composite network theory was found to be inadequate. Results obtained on composite networks of 1,2-polybutadiene for three different types of strain, namely equibiaxial extension, pure shear, and simple extension, are discussed in the present paper. The Gaussian composite network elastic free energy relation is found to be adequate in equibiaxial extension and possibly pure shear. Extrapolation to zero strain gives the same result for all three types of strain The contribution from chain entangling at elastic equilibrium is found to be approximately equal to the pseudo-equilibrium rubber plateau modulus and about three times larger than the contribution from chemical cross-links. 

It is clearly shown that chain entangling plays a major role in networks of 1,2-polybutadiene produced by cross-linking of long linear chains. The two-network method should provide critical tests for new molecular theories of rubber elasticity which take chain entangling into account. 

The chains of typical networks are of sufficient length and flexibility to justify representation of the distribution of their end-to-end lengths by the most tractable of all distribution functions, the Gaussian. This facet of the problem being so summarily dealt with, the burden of rubber elasticity theory centers on the connections between the end-to-end lengths of the chains comprising the network and the macroscopic strain. 

Equation (2.53) is stating that the network modulus is the product of the thermal energy and the number of springs trapped by the entanglements. This is the result that is predicted for covalently crosslinked elastomers from the theory of rubber elasticity that will be discussed in a little more detail below. However, what we should focus on here is that there is a range of frequencies over which a polymer melt behaves as a crosslinked three-dimensional mesh. At low frequencies entanglements... 

However, in doing so one tests two theories the network formation theory and the rubber elasticity theory and there are at present deeper uncertainties in the latter than in the former. Many attempts to analyze the validity of the rubber elasticity theories were in the past based on the assumption of ideality of networks prepared usually by endllnklng. The ideal state can be approached but never reached experimentally and small deviations may have a considerable effect on the concentration of elastically active chains (EANC) and thus on the equilibrium modulus. The main issue of the rubber elasticity studies is to find which theory fits the experimental data best. This problem goes far beyond the network... 

---