Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Negative concentrations

This confidence interval states that the analyte s true concentration lies within the range of -0.16 ppm to 1.44 ppm. Including a negative concentration within the confidence interval should lead you to reevaluate your data or conclusions. On further investigation your data may show that the standard deviation is larger than expected. [Pg.81]

Errors in advection may completely overshadow diffusion. The amplification of random errors with each succeeding step causes numerical instability (or distortion). Higher-order differencing techniques are used to avoid this instability, but they may result in sharp gradients, which may cause negative concentrations to appear in the computations. Many of the numerical instability (distortion) problems can be overcome with a second-moment scheme (9) which advects the moments of the distributions instead of the pollutants alone. Six numerical techniques were investigated (10), including the second-moment scheme three were found that limited numerical distortion the second-moment, the cubic spline, and the chapeau function. [Pg.326]

Equation 5-247 is a polynomial, and the roots (C ) are determined using a numerical method such as the Newton-Raphson as illustrated in Appendix D. For second order kinetics, the positive sign (-r) of the quadratic Equation 5-245 is chosen. Otherwise, the other root would give a negative concentration, which is physically impossible. This would also be the case for the nth order kinetics in an isothermal reactor. Therefore, for the nth order reaction in an isothermal CFSTR, there is only one physically significant root (0 < C < C g) for a given residence time f. [Pg.338]

Figure 4.29. Back-calculated results for files VALIDX.dat. The data are presented sequentially from left to right. The ordinate is in % of the nominal concentration. Numbers X = 1,2, and 3 indicate the data file. Each bracket indicates a day s worth of results (sorted by concentration). The log/log format tends to produce positive deviations at low concentrations, while the lin/lin format does the opposite, to the point of suggesting negative concentrations The reason is that the low concentration values are tightly clustered at the left end of the lin/lin depiction whereas the values are evenly spread in the log/log depiction, with commensurate effects on the position of Xmean, the sum Sxx< and the influence each coordinate has on the slope. The calibration design was optimized for the log/log format. Figure 4.29. Back-calculated results for files VALIDX.dat. The data are presented sequentially from left to right. The ordinate is in % of the nominal concentration. Numbers X = 1,2, and 3 indicate the data file. Each bracket indicates a day s worth of results (sorted by concentration). The log/log format tends to produce positive deviations at low concentrations, while the lin/lin format does the opposite, to the point of suggesting negative concentrations The reason is that the low concentration values are tightly clustered at the left end of the lin/lin depiction whereas the values are evenly spread in the log/log depiction, with commensurate effects on the position of Xmean, the sum Sxx< and the influence each coordinate has on the slope. The calibration design was optimized for the log/log format.
Two solutions for x, one positive and one negative, can be obtained from this equation, but only one will have physical meaning. There cannot be any negative concentrations. [Pg.292]

It is of interest to examine how the manipulated variables (Min, I., and Q) behave in order to yield results such as those of Figure 7. Unless proper limits are imposed by the model, the manipulations required may be difficult or even impossible to achieve in practice (for example, negative concentrations or flow rates). In this case all three manipulated variables were restricted to positive values. In addition, M n was given an upper bound. No restrictions were placed on rates of change of the variables. [Pg.198]

The negative concentration obviously is physically meaningless. We determine the total concentration of all species, and then the total pressure. [Pg.359]

The quadratic equation always gives two answers. We can eliminate one of the answers since it is physically impossible to have a negative concentration. This leaves us with only the positive root. If we enter this answer into the bottom line of our table, we get the following equilibrium concentrations ... [Pg.216]

Step 4 The value x = 0.306 is physically impossible because it would result in a negative concentration of both CO and H2O at equilibrium. [Pg.345]

All spectra were run on a Nicolet 7199 FTIR spectrometer equipped to operate in the mid-infrared (wide-band MCT detector). A leastsquares analysis program provided by Nicolet (MCOMP) was extensively modified for efficient routine use with a large number of reference minerals. The reference mineral with the lowest negative concentration in each least-squares decomposition of the LTA spectra was omitted upon each iteration, until only non-negative concentrations were obtained. Generally 12 to 18 minerals remained in the final calculation. [Pg.47]

The IR methods have progressed from hand-drawn baselines and peak height or area for quantitation, to spectral subtraction, to leastsquares methods. Least-squares analysis eliminates the reliance on single peaks for quantitation and the subjectivity of spectral subtraction. However, negative concentration coefficients are a problem with least-squares analysis, since they have no physical meaning. Negative components can be omitted according to some criterion and the least-squares process iterated until only... [Pg.49]

Randomly selected data from a population are normally syimnetrically distribnted aronnd the mean value. But in some cases the distribntion is nnsynunetrical the distribution is skewed. Data from chemical analyses close to the limit of detection are nnavoidably skewed, because negative concentrations are not possible. [Pg.167]

Analytical data close to the detection limit often are skewed because negative concentrations are not possible... [Pg.167]

FIGURE 3.14 Zimm plot for a polymer scaled with a negative concentration coefficient (x) to improve data esthetics and accessibility. [Pg.67]

Some variables cannot be negative (concentration, body weight) other variables have upper bounds (e.g., 100%). If the fitted distribution exceeds these bounds the tails may be truncated (draws in a Monte Carlo analysis have to be processed accordingly) however, distributions that have to be severely truncated are a poor choice. Especially proportions or fractions that range between 0 and 1 (0% and 100%) should only be represented by a distribution with finite tails (e.g., beta or uniform distribution). [Pg.157]

These steady states are within the physically possible range of T 0 < T < oo) and X(0 < X < 1). This is in contrast to many situations in the physical sciences where equations have multiple roots but only one root is physically acceptable because the other solutions are either outside the bounds of parameters (such as negative concentrations or temperatures) or occur as imaginary or complex numbers and can therefore be ignored. [Pg.250]

Step 2 QP diffuses across the membrane because of negative concentration gradient. [Pg.230]

Consider the situation where an LC column is fed with a mobile phase containing a solute at a given concentration until equilibrium is achieved, and an injection of pure mobile phase, devoid of the solute, is placed on the first plate of the column. This will result in a fall in concentration of the solute in the first plate which, mathematically, will represent the injection of a charge of negative concentration. This negative concentration profile of sample will pass through the column in exactly the same way as a positive concentration profile and will be eluted at the same retention time or volume but will be recorded as a negative peak by the detector... [Pg.55]

In concluding this section, we should touch upon phase boundary concentration data for poly(p-benzamide) dimethylacetamide + 4% LiCl [89], poly(p-phenylene terephthalamide) (PPTA Kevlar)-sulfuric acid [90], and (hydroxy-propyl)cellulose-dichloroacetic acid solutions [91]. Although not included in Figs. 7 and 8, they show appreciable downward deviations from the prediction by the scaled particle theory for the wormlike hard spherocylinder. Arpin and Strazielle [30] found a negative concentration dependence of the reduced viscosity for PPTA in dilute Solution of sulfuric acid, as often reported on polyelectrolyte systems. Therefore, the deviation of the Ci data for PPTA in sulfuric acid from the scaled particle theory may be attributed to the electrostatic interaction. For the other two systems too, the low C] values may be due to the protonation of the polymer, because the solvents of these systems are very polar. [Pg.116]

Equation (57) states that if there is a negative concentration gradient in the +x direction, there will be a mass flux in the x direction further a negative gradient in the temperature in the +x direction will cause A to flow in the +x direction (that is, toward the colder region). From Eqs. (57) and (58) it can be shown that the difference in the average velocities of species A and B is... [Pg.177]

So one can consider V as the eigenvector representation of E and QT as the eigenvector representation of C. Unfortunately, these matrices in their present form have little physical significance. The matrix QT whose rows represent eigenvectors of the covariance matrix must necessarily be orthogonal to each other and therefore must be negative at some points. The concept of a negative concentration is novel but unacceptable. [Pg.106]

Suppose that you carry out an analytical procedure to generate a calibration curve like that shown in Figure 4-11. Then you analyze an unknown and find an absorbance that gives a negative concentration for the analyte. What does this mean ... [Pg.76]

One admonition is necessary concerning the maximum kinetics parameter that may be employed in any simulation. As is evident in Equations 20.53, 20.59, and 20.61, if too large a value is used for k,tk or k2Ctk, a negative concentration may result. Since this is impossible, any values of these kinetics parameters that yield negative concentrations may be regarded as too large for treatment by these methods. In the case of first-order kinetics, the maximum rate that can be handled occurs when... [Pg.606]

Figure 3.6 shows that, for exothermic reactions (0 > 0), the effectiveness factor may exceed unity. This is because the increase in rate caused by the temperature rise inside the particle more than compensates for the decrease in rate caused by the negative concentration gradient which effects a decrease in concentration towards the centre of the particle. A further point of interest is that, for reactions which are highly exothermic and at low value of the Thiele modulus, the value of tj is not uniquely defined by the Thiele modulus and the parameters 0 and e. The shape of... [Pg.125]


See other pages where Negative concentrations is mentioned: [Pg.196]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.683]    [Pg.436]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.1021]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.606]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.115]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.22 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.23 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info