Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Molecules molecular bonds

Figure A3.9.8. An elbow potential energy surface representing the dissociation of a diatomic in two dimensions-the molecular bond lengdi and tlie distance from the molecule to the surface. Figure A3.9.8. An elbow potential energy surface representing the dissociation of a diatomic in two dimensions-the molecular bond lengdi and tlie distance from the molecule to the surface.
Schinke R and Huber J R 1993 Photodissociation dynamics of polyatomic molecules. The relationship between potential energy surfaces and the breaking of molecular bonds J. Rhys. Chem. 97 3463... [Pg.1090]

Lines 4—18 form the connection table (Ctah), containing the description of the collection of atoms constituting the given compound, which can be wholly or partially connected by bonds. Such a collection can represent molecules, molecular fragments, substructures, substituent groups, and so on. In case of a Molfile, the Ctah block describes a single molecule. [Pg.49]

Molecular orbitals are not unique. The same exact wave function could be expressed an infinite number of ways with different, but equivalent orbitals. Two commonly used sets of orbitals are localized orbitals and symmetry-adapted orbitals (also called canonical orbitals). Localized orbitals are sometimes used because they look very much like a chemist s qualitative models of molecular bonds, lone-pair electrons, core electrons, and the like. Symmetry-adapted orbitals are more commonly used because they allow the calculation to be executed much more quickly for high-symmetry molecules. Localized orbitals can give the fastest calculations for very large molecules without symmetry due to many long-distance interactions becoming negligible. [Pg.125]

Molecular ion (Section 13 22) In mass spectrometry the species formed by loss of an electron from a molecule Molecular orbital theory (Section 2 4) Theory of chemical bonding in which electrons are assumed to occupy orbitals in molecules much as they occupy orbitals in atoms The molecular orbitals are descnbed as combinations of the or bitals of all of the atoms that make up the molecule Molecularity (Section 4 8) The number of species that react to gether in the same elementary step of a reaction mechanism... [Pg.1288]

It has been common practice to blend plasticisers with certain polymers since the early days of the plastics industry when Alexander Parkes introduced Parkesine. When they were first used their function was primarily to act as spacers between the polymer molecules. Less energy was therefore required for molecular bond rotation and polymers became capable of flow at temperatures below their decomposition temperature. It was subsequently found that plasticisers could serve two additional purposes, to lower the melt viscosity and to change physical properties of the product such as to increase softness and flexibility and decrease the cold flex temperature (a measure of the temperature below which the polymer compound loses its flexibility). [Pg.131]

The traditional view of molecular bonds is that they are due to an increased probability of finding electrons between two nuclei, as compared to a sum of the contributions of the pure atomic orbitals. The canonical MOs are delocalized over the whole molecule and do not readily reflect this. There is, furthermore, little similarity between MOs for systems which by chemical measures should be similar, such as a series of alkanes. The canonical MOs therefore do not reflect the concept of functional groups. [Pg.227]

The total energy in ab initio theory is given relative to the separated particles, i.e. bare nuclei and electrons. The experimental value for an atom is the sum of all the ionization potentials for a molecule there are additional contributions from the molecular bonds and associated zero-point energies. The experimental value for the total energy of H2O is —76.480 a.u., and the estimated contribution from relativistic effects is —0.045 a.u. Including a mass correction of 0.0028 a.u. (a non-Bom-Oppenheimer effect which accounts for the difference between finite and infinite nuclear masses) allows the experimental non-relativistic energy to be estimated at —76.438 0.003 a.u. ... [Pg.267]

The situation with some forms of biological deterioration is somewhat different. Where the agent is macrobiological, as in the case of rodents, insects, and marine borers, the attack is physical in nature, such as by gnawing or boring. The attack is not at the atomic or molecular level. Any breaking of molecular bonds such as in polymer chain shortening is thus accidental. The attack may be said to be at the material s structural level, not the polymer molecule level. [Pg.263]

For a large molecule, the internal forces acting on a particular bond are the result of the deformation of some finite number of intramolecular and inter-molecular bonds in the vicinity of the bond being ruptured. [Pg.109]

Lewis s theory of the chemical bond was brilliant, but it was little more than guesswork inspired by insight. Lewis had no way of knowing why an electron pair was so important for the formation of covalent bonds. Valence-bond theory explained the importance of the electron pair in terms of spin-pairing but it could not explain the properties of some molecules. Molecular orbital theory, which is also based on quantum mechanics and was introduced in the late 1920s by Mul-liken and Hund, has proved to be the most successful theory of the chemical bond it overcomes all the deficiencies of Lewis s theory and is easier to use in calculations than valence-bond theory. [Pg.238]

The interaction of radiation with a material can lead to an absorption of energy when the radiation frequency matches one of the resonant frequencies of the material. The exact frequency at which the absorption occurs and the shape of the absorption feature can provide detailed information about electronic stmcture, molecular bonding, and the association of molecules into microstmctural units. [Pg.184]

In this section, we develop a process for making schematic drawings of molecules called Lewis structures. A Lewis structure shows how the atoms in a molecule are bonded together. A Lewis structure also reveals the distribution of bonding and nonbonding valence electrons in a molecule. In a sense, a Lewis structure is a molecular blueprint that... [Pg.582]

The Lewis stmcture of a molecule shows how the valence electrons are distributed among the atoms. This gives a useful qualitative picture, but a more thorough understanding of chemistry requires more detailed descriptions of molecular bonding and molecular shapes. In particular, the three-dimensional structure of a molecule, which plays an essential role in determining chemical reactivity, is not shown directly by a Lewis structure. [Pg.603]

Covalent bonds form between atoms with similar electronegativities. In these reactions, electrons do not migrate from one atom to another as they do in ionic bonds they are shared by the atoms in the molecule. A good way to visualize this was proposed by Gilbert Lewis, a chemist at the University of California, Berkeley. His representations of molecular bonds are called Lewis dot structures. These structures use dots to denote the valence electrons of an element or molecule. [Pg.84]

In order to obtain a better model for the molecular bond, [Santos et al., 2006] employed the extended Hiickel, or tight binding, theory. For the breaking of the bond in a diatomic molecule according to the schemes... [Pg.49]

T ike metals minerals also exhibit typical crystalline structures. As an example, the structure of molybdenite is shown in Figure 1.17. It is hexagonal with six-pole symmetry and contains two molecules per unit cell. Each sulfur atom is equidistant from three molybdenum atoms and each molybdenum atom is surrounded by six sulfur atoms located at the comers of a trigonal prism. There are two types of bonds that can be established between the atoms which constitute the molybdenite crystal stmcture. They are the covalent bonds between sulfur and molybdenum atoms and the Van der Waals bonds between sulfur-sulfur atoms. The Van der Waals bond is considerably weaker than the covalent sulfur-molybdenum bond. This causes the bonds of sulfur-sulfur to cleave easily, imparting to molybdenite the property of being a dry lubricant. Molybdenite adheres to metallic surfaces with the development of a molecular bond and the friction between metallic surfaces is replaced by easy friction between two layers of sulfur atoms. [Pg.53]


See other pages where Molecules molecular bonds is mentioned: [Pg.800]    [Pg.907]    [Pg.909]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.787]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.804]    [Pg.1096]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.958]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.535]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.614]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.140]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.19 ]




SEARCH



Bonding molecules

Molecular bonding

© 2024 chempedia.info