Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Molecular ultrafiltration

Type IV collagen is a fundamental component of basement membranes (Fig. 1A). Basement membranes represent the portion of extracellular matrix that remains in direct contact with its formative cells. Basement membranes play an important role in cell adhesion, growth and differentiation, tissue repair, molecular ultrafiltration, cancer cell invasion, and metastasis. [Pg.377]

Cross-Flow Filtration in Porous Pipes. Another way of limiting cake growth is to pump the slurry through porous pipes at high velocities of the order of thousands of times the filtration velocity through the walls of the pipes. This is ia direct analogy with the now weU-estabHshed process of ultrafiltration which itself borders on reverse osmosis at the molecular level. The three processes are closely related yet different ia many respects. [Pg.412]

Fig. 29. Rejection of test proteins as a function of molecular weight, in a series of ultrafiltration membranes with different weight cut-offs (69). Fig. 29. Rejection of test proteins as a function of molecular weight, in a series of ultrafiltration membranes with different weight cut-offs (69).
Membrane Sep r tion. The separation of components ofhquid milk products can be accompHshed with semipermeable membranes by either ultrafiltration (qv) or hyperfiltration, also called reverse osmosis (qv) (30). With ultrafiltration (UF) the membrane selectively prevents the passage of large molecules such as protein. In reverse osmosis (RO) different small, low molecular weight molecules are separated. Both procedures require that pressure be maintained and that the energy needed is a cost item. The materials from which the membranes are made are similar for both processes and include cellulose acetate, poly(vinyl chloride), poly(vinyHdene diduoride), nylon, and polyamide (see AFembrane technology). Membranes are commonly used for the concentration of whey and milk for cheesemaking (31). For example, membranes with 100 and 200 p.m are used to obtain a 4 1 reduction of skimmed milk. [Pg.368]

Ultrafiltration is a pressure-driven filtration separation occurring on a molecular scale (see Dialysis Filtration Hollow-fibermembranes Membrane TECHNOLOGY REVERSE osMOSis). Typically, a liquid including small dissolved molecules is forced through a porous membrane. Large dissolved molecules, coUoids, and suspended soHds that caimot pass through the pores are retained. [Pg.293]

Reverse Osmosis and Ultrafiltration. Reverse osmosis (qv) (or hyperfiltration) and ultrafilttation (qv) ate pressure driven membrane processes that have become well estabUshed ia pollution control (89—94). There is no sharp distinction between the two both processes remove solutes from solution. Whereas ultrafiltration usually implies the separation of macromolecules from relatively low molecular-weight solvent, reverse osmosis normally refers to the separation of the solute and solvent molecules within the same order of magnitude in molecular weight (95) (see also Membrane technology). [Pg.382]

Ultrafiltration (qv) (uf) is increasingly used to remove water, salts, and other low molecular-weight impurities (21) water may be added to wash out impurities, ie, diafiltration. Ultrafiltration is rarely used to fractionate the proteins because the capacity and yield are too low when significant protein separation is achieved. Various vacuum evaporators are used to remove water to 20—40% dry matter. Spray drying is used if a powdery intermediate product is desired. Tyophilization (freeze-drying) is only used for heat-sensitive and highly priced enzymes. [Pg.290]

Sodium poly(a-L-glutamate). It was washed with acetone, dried, dissolved in water and ppted with isopropanol at 5°. Impurities and low molecular weight fractions were removed by dialysis of the aqueous solution for 50h, followed by ultrafiltration through a filter impermeable to polymers of molecular weights greater the 10. The polymer was recovered by freeze-drying. [Mori et al. J Chem Soc, Faraday Trans I 2583 1978.]... [Pg.475]

Like normal filtration, with ultrafiltration (UF), a feed emulsion is introduced into and pumped through a membrane unit water and some dissolved low molecular weight materials pass through the membrane under an applied hydrostatic pressure. In contrast to ordinary filtration however, there is no build-up of retained materials on the membrane filter. [Pg.345]

Ultrafiltration Solution or colloidal suspension of high molecular weight organics One stream concentrated in high molecular weight organics one containing dissolved ions... [Pg.429]

Tangential crossflow filtration Process where the feed stream sweeps the membrane surface and the particulate debris is expelled, thus extending filter life. The filtrate flows through the membrane. Most commonly used in the separation of high-and-low-molecular weight matter such as in ultrapure reverse osmosis, ultrafiltration, and submicron microfiltration processes. [Pg.626]

P. Zumbusch, W. Kulcke, G. Brunner. Use of alternating electric fields as antifouling strategy in ultrafiltration of biological suspensions. Introduction of a new experimental procedure for crossflow filtration. J Memb Sci 142-.15 (1998). R. L. Rowley, T. D. Shupe, M. W. Schuck. A direct method for determination of chemical potential with molecular dynamics simulations. 1. Pure components. Mol Phys 52 841, 1994. [Pg.797]

Ultrafiltration of micellar solutions combines the high permeate flows commonly found in ultrafiltration systems with the possibility of removing molecules independent of their size, since micelles can specifically solubilize or bind low molecular weight components. Characteristics of this separation technique, known as micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF), are that micelles bind specific compounds and subsequent ultrafiltration separates the surrounding aqueous phase from the micelles [70]. The pore size of the UF membrane must be chosen such, that the micelles are retained but the unbound components can pass the membrane freely. Alternatively, proteins such as BSA have been used in stead of micelles to obtain similar enan-tioselective aggregates [71]. [Pg.145]

Purification of poloxamers has been extensively investigated due to their use in medical applications, the intention often being to remove potentially toxic components. Supercritical fluid fractionation and liquid fractionation have been used successfully to remove low-molecular weight impurities and antioxidants from poloxamers. Gel filtration, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and ultrafiltration through membranes are among the other techniques examined [5]. [Pg.768]

Commercially available plate- and frame- type ultrafiltration equipment are used for exopolysaccharide concentration. The membranes are polysulphone or polyvinylidine fluoride with molecular weight cut-off between 20-60,000. There is a relatively low eneigy requirement (1-2 kWh m 3) for pumping the fluid through the filtration unit at the desired pressure. Pressure difference across the membrane is of the order 2-14 atmospheres. [Pg.212]

Ultrafiltration has the advantage that there is removal of low molecular weight fermentation products and medium components during concentration of the exopolysaccharide. In addition, biological degradation is minimised because fluid is held only for a short time during the filtration process. Other advantages lie in file fact that there is no requirement for solvent recovery and the process is carried out at ambient (not elevated) temperature. [Pg.212]

The eluted luciferase is precipitated with ammonium sulfate. The precipitate is dissolved in 1 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, containing 0.1 mM EDTA, 3 mM DTT and 0.1 M NaCl, and chromatographed on a column of Sephacryl S-300 (2.6 x 97 cm) using the same buffer. Luciferase is eluted in two peaks, corresponding to the molecular weights of about 420,000 (an aggregate) and 130,000, in a ratio of about 8 1. The fractions of these two peaks are pooled separately the Mr 420,000 luciferase is concentrated by either ultrafiltration or precipitation with ammonium sulfate. [Pg.253]

Primary isolation is done to increase product concentration. Solvent extraction, absorption, precipitation and ultrafiltration are the best known. Ultrafiltration can discriminate at the molecular level. During primary isolation, desired product concentration increases considerably and substances of widely differing polarities are separated from the product. [Pg.171]

Eig. 16.9. Dependence of rejection coefficient on molecular weight for ultrafiltration membranes. [Pg.360]

A limitation to the more widespread use of membrane separation processes is membrane fouling, as would be expected in the industrial application of such finely porous materials. Fouling results in a continuous decline in membrane penneation rate, an increased rejection of low molecular weight solutes and eventually blocking of flow channels. On start-up of a process, a reduction in membrane permeation rate to 30-10% of the pure water permeation rate after a few minutes of operation is common for ultrafiltration. Such a rapid decrease may be even more extreme for microfiltration. This is often followed by a more gradual... [Pg.376]

Fig. 17.9. Purity comparison (SDS-PAGE) of the conventional purification process and integrated cell disrupt tion/fluidised bed adsorption.The numbers given in the flow sheet indicate the origin of samples and correspond to their respective lane numbers. Lanes M, low molecular weight markers 1, Erwinia disruptate, 15% biomass ww/v 2, eluate CM HyperD LS, fluidised bed 3, desalted eluate (after dia/ultrafiltration, 30 K MWCO membrane) 4, flow-through, DEAE fixed bed 5, elution, DEAE fixed bed 6, eluate CM HyperD LS 7, CM cellulose eluate 8, CM cellulose eluate, final 9, final commercial product. Fig. 17.9. Purity comparison (SDS-PAGE) of the conventional purification process and integrated cell disrupt tion/fluidised bed adsorption.The numbers given in the flow sheet indicate the origin of samples and correspond to their respective lane numbers. Lanes M, low molecular weight markers 1, Erwinia disruptate, 15% biomass ww/v 2, eluate CM HyperD LS, fluidised bed 3, desalted eluate (after dia/ultrafiltration, 30 K MWCO membrane) 4, flow-through, DEAE fixed bed 5, elution, DEAE fixed bed 6, eluate CM HyperD LS 7, CM cellulose eluate 8, CM cellulose eluate, final 9, final commercial product.
Kj is the distribution ratio of uncomplexed ions and all low molecular weight inorganic and organic complexes (ultrafiltration cutoff was at a molecular weight of 1000). [Pg.307]

S-layer ultrafiltration membranes (SUMs) are isoporous structures with very sharp molecular exclusion limits (see Section III.B). SUMs were manufactured by depositing S-layer-carrying cell wall fragments of B. sphaericus CCM 2120 on commercial microfiltration membranes with a pore size up to 1 pm in a pressure-dependent process [73]. Mechanical and chemical resistance of these composite structures could be improved by introducing inter- and intramolecular covalent linkages between the individual S-layer subunits. The uni-... [Pg.373]


See other pages where Molecular ultrafiltration is mentioned: [Pg.411]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.530]    [Pg.530]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.490]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.2058]    [Pg.2144]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.502]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.527]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.518 , Pg.519 , Pg.520 , Pg.521 , Pg.522 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.518 , Pg.519 , Pg.520 , Pg.521 , Pg.522 ]




SEARCH



Molecular composition ultrafiltration

Molecular weight cutoff values ultrafiltration

Molecular weight ultrafiltration

Nominal molecular weight cutoff ultrafiltration membranes

Ultrafiltrate

Ultrafiltration molecular weight cutoff

Ultrafiltration, molecular weight limit

© 2024 chempedia.info