Molecular composition ultrafiltration

The molecular composition of the high molecular weight (HMW) fraction of seawater DOM that can be isolated by ultrafiltration with... 

S-layer ultrafiltration membranes (SUMs) are isoporous structures with very sharp molecular exclusion limits (see Section III.B). SUMs were manufactured by depositing S-layer-carrying cell wall fragments of B. sphaericus CCM 2120 on commercial microfiltration membranes with a pore size up to 1 pm in a pressure-dependent process [73]. Mechanical and chemical resistance of these composite structures could be improved by introducing inter- and intramolecular covalent linkages between the individual S-layer subunits. The uni-... 

Ultrafiltration of heterogenous colloidal suspensions such as citrus juice is complex and many factors other than molecular weight contribute to fouling and permeation. For example, low MW aroma compounds were unevenly distributed in the permeate and retentate in UF in 500 kd MWCO system (10). The authors observed that the 500 kd MWCO UF removed all suspended solids, including pectin and PE. If PE is complexed to pectate in an inactive complex, then it is conceivable that release of PE from pectin with cations will enhance permeation in UF. At optimum salt concentration, less PE activation was observed at lower pH values than at higher pH (15). In juice systems, it is difficult to separate the effect of juice particulates on PE activity. Model studies with PE extracts allows UF in the absence of large or insoluble particulates and control of composition of the ultrafilter. In... 

Membrane Morphology—Pores, Symmetric, Composite Only nucleopore and anodyne membranes have relatively uniform pores. Reverse osmosis, gas permeation, and pervaporation membranes have nonuniform angstrom-sized pores corresponding to spaces in between the rigid or agamic membrane molecules. Solute-membrane molecular interactions are very high. Ultrafiltration membranes have nonuniform nanometer sized pores with some solute-membrane interactions. For other microfiltration membranes with nonuniform pores on the submicrometer to micrometer range, solute-membrane interactions are small. 

Ultrafiltration results in little loss of enzyme activity and can be nsed for concentration and fractionation on basis of molecular weight, for removal of salts and low molecnlar weight species, as well as for changing salt composition by diafiltration. 

Figure 24 shows the rejections of polymer solutes, polyethylene glycols) (PEG) with monodispersed molecular weights. From Fig. 24, it is apparent that the composite membrane can find application for ultrafiltration. The molecular weight cut-off drastically decreased by more than 10 fold from the swollen state at 25 °C to the shrunken state at 45 °C. Thus the switching ability of the gel was demonstrated in the permeation experiments. 

Most ultrafiltration membranes are porous, asymmetric, polymeric structures produced by phase inversion, i.e., the gelation or precipitation of a species from a soluble phase. See also Membrane Separations Technology. Membrane structure is a function of the materials used (polymer composition, molecular weight distribution, solvent system, etc) and the mode of preparation (solution viscosity, evaporation time, humidity, etc.). Commonly used polymers include cellulose acetates, polyamides, polysulfoncs, dyncls (vinyl chlondc-acrylonitrile copolymers) and puly(vinylidene fluoride). 

Chemical differences between these fractions of DOM are apparent, but there is considerable compositional overlap as well. Extraction of humic substances or ultrafiltration removes most of the colored DOM from water samples and most of the dissolved lignin (Ertel et al., 1986 Opsahl and Benner, 1998). This is consistent with the observation that many humic and fulvic acids have molecular masses greater than the cutoff (1000 Da) of the membranes used for DOM isolation by ultrafiltration (Thurman, 1985). 

As the filtrate flows into the descending limb of this loop, the NaCl concentration in the fluid surrounding the tubule increases by a factor of four, and osmotic processes cause water to be reabsorbed. At the same time, salts and metabolic products are secreted into the tubular fluid. In the ascending limb, in contrast, the tubular wall is nearly impermeable to water. Here, the epithelial cells contain molecular pumps that transport sodium and chloride from the tubular fluid into the space between the nephrons (the interstitium). These processes are accounted for in considerable detail in the spatially extended model developed by Holstein-Rathlou et al. [14]. In the present model, the reabsorption l rmh in the proximal tubule and the flow resistance Rum are treated as constants. Without affecting the composition much, the proximal tubule reabsorbs close to 60% of the ultrafiltrate produced by the glomerulus. 

In addition to methods that yield average molecular weights, there are a number of methods (gel filtration, ultrafiltration, small-angle X-ray scattering) that measure molecular size. In these methods, model compounds of known molecular weight and composition are used to estimate the molecular weight of humic substances. Problems can arise if the model compounds are not sufficiently similar to the humic substances of interest. Choice of appropriate model compounds is hampered by lack of detailed information about the chemical structures of humic substances. 

Rowe (Rl) was able to prove that purified albumin prepared from nephrotic serum and urine had the same molecular weight as that from normal serum he concludes that the increased excretion of albumin by nephrotic patients is not the result of a reduction of its molecular dimensions, but rather that the abnormality resides in the kidney. Ultrafiltration experiments showed (Fig. 23) that a selective molecular filtration may be reproduced by a suitable membrane in vitro. Rowe concludes that it is not necessary to invoke tubular activity to account for the composition of the uroproteins. 

This chapter focuses on the chemical processing of ceramic membranes, which has to date constituted the major part of inorganic membrane development. Before going further into the ceramic aspect, it is important to understand the requirements for ceramic membrane materials in terms of porous structure, chemical composition, and shape. In separation technologies based on permselective membranes, the difference in filtered species ranges from micrometer-sized particles to nanometer-sized species, such as molecular solutes or gas molecules. One can see that the connected porosity of the membrane must be adapted to the class of products to be separated. For this reason, ceramic membrane manufacture is concerned with macropores above 0.1 pm in diameter for microfiltration, mesopores ranging from 0.1 pm to 2 nm for ultrafiltration, and nanopores less than 2 nm in diameter for nanofiltration, per-vaporation, or gas separation. Dense membranes are also of interest for gas... 

---