Modulus at the interface

Assume that the interface coincides with the grid point defining the stress rj+i/2 in Fig. 3. It can be shown (Moczo et al. 2002) that the boundary conditions at the interface can be fulfilled by defining the shear modulus at the interface as the harmonic average of the shear moduli from the two connected media ... 

A high modulus gradient at the interface is also be avoided in materials Joined as a result of the interdiffusion of materials to form a fractal surface [32]. The effect is to produce an interfacial composite region. This strengthens the interface and leads to a more gradual change in modulus and avoids the sharp concentrations of stress which would occur at a smooth interface. 

The shape of the curves for the dilational modulus (Figures 7 and 8) suggests a single relaxation mechanism, probably the unfolding of the demulsifier molecules at the interface. The frequency peak in the e"(f) plot is a measure of the characteristic relaxation time. A shorter relaxation time, by inducing faster film drainage, increases demulsification efficiency. 

For effective demulsification of a water-in-oil emulsion, both shear viscosity as well as dynamic tension gradient of the water-oil interface have to be lowered. The interfacial dilational modulus data indicate that the interfacial relaxation process occurs faster with an effective demulsifier. The electron spin resonance with labeled demulsifiers suggests that demulsifiers form clusters in the bulk oil. The unclustering and rearrangement of the demulsifier at the interface may affect the interfacial relaxation process. 

The commercial composite materials being marketed today are optimized in order to make the interfacial properties acceptable in the sense that they will not fail at such low levels as to detract from the overall composite behavior. Considering a unidirectional specimen, where the fibers are all aligned parallel to each other, commercial systems can be described by a rule of mixtures661 relationship (Fig. 10). Properties of the matrix and fiber can be linearly combined based on the volume fraction of each constituent. For example, the longitudinal tensile modulus is the sum of the proportion of each component. The interface in these systems is considered ideal in that it efficiently transmits forces between fiber and matrix without failure. Using this model as a basis for micromechanical analysis and discussion, the magnitude of the forces present at the interface can be predicted. 

Consider the same unidirectional lamina with the stresses now applied perpendicular to the fiber axis as shown in Fig. 12. The local stress at the fiber matrix interface can be calculated and compared to the nominally applied stress on the whole lamina to give K, the stress concentration factor. The plot of the results of this analysis shows that the interfacial stresses at the point of maximum principal stress can range up to 2.6 times the applied stress depending on the moduli of the constituents and the volume fraction of the reinforcement. For a typical graphite-epoxy composite, with a modulus ratio of 70 and a volume fraction of 70 % the stress concentration factor at the interface is about 2.4. That is, the local stresses at the interface are a factor of 2.4 times greater than the applied stress. 

Imposing a shear stress parallel to the fiber axis of a unidirectional composite creates an interfacial shear stress. Because of the disparity in material properties between fiber and matrix, a stress concentration factor can develop at the fiber-matrix interface. Linder longitudinal shear stress as shown by the diagram in Fig. 13, the stress concentration factor is interfacial. The analysis shows that the stress concentration factor can be increased with the constituent shear modulus ratio and volume fraction of fibers in the composite. Under shear loading conditions at the interface, the stress concentration factor can range up to 11. This is a value that is much greater than any of the other loadings have produced at the fiber-matrix interface. 

Fig. 13. A unidirectional lamina under shear loading. The dots indicate the points of high stress concentration at the interface. The micromechanical analysis shows that the stress concentration factor increases with volume fraction of fiber and fiber to matrix shear modulus ratio. From Adams et al.70)...

Investigations on SmFeB/TbFeB multilayers have shown that strain and stress are transferred effectively at the interface (Shima et al. 1997). In these SmFeBA bFeB multilayers, the thickness of the layers was varied, and it was found that the magnetostriction is sensitively affected by Young s modulus, the Poisson ratio and the thickness of the constituent layers. 

Figure 24. A comparison of the data obtained from a range of surface rheological measurements of samples of /3-lg as a function of Tween 20 concentration. ( ), The surface diffusion coefficient of FITC-jS-lg (0.2 mg/ml) at the interfaces of a/w thin films (X), the surface shear viscosity of /3-lg (0.01 mg/ml) at the o/w interface after 5 hours adsorption ( ), the surface dilational elasticity and (o) the dilational loss modulus of /3-lg (0.2 mg/ml).

SBM) as a compatibilizer. As a result of the particular thermodynamic interaction between the relevant blocks and the blend components, a discontinuous and nanoscale distribution of the elastomer at the interface, the so-called raspberry morphology, is observed (Fig. 15). Similar morphologies have also been observed when using triblock terpolymers with hydrogenated middle blocks (polystyrene-W<9ck-poly(ethylene-C0-butylene)-Wock-poly(methyl methacrylate), SEBM). It is this discontinuous interfacial coverage by the elastomer as compared to a continuous layer which allows one to minimize the loss in modulus and to ensure toughening of the PPE/SAN blend [69],... 

The elastic bending modulus Kc for lipid bilayers was found to be of the order of 10 x 10-20 J.6 For the lyotropic lamellar liquid crystals, the additional presence of a cosurfactant at the interface shouldleadto smaller values. Various experimental measurements21 provided values ranging between 0.08 and 5 x 10-20 J. 

The mechanical properties of materials involve various concepts such as hardness, shear and bulk modulus. The group III nitrides are now mostly used as fihns or layers grown by metal organic vapour phase epitaxy (MOVPE) or molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) on sapphire, GaAs or SiC. The lattice parameters of the substrate do not generally match those of the deposited layer, and therefore, stresses appear at the interface and in the layer and modify its physical properties. Hence, it is necessary to have a good knowledge of these properties. 

---