Modifying existing loops

In its development, it adapted two existing technologies, In the agricultural sector, the mechanics of grain elevators provided a model for how to move solids vertical distances and in closed-loop flow arrangements. Sacony engineers modified the elevator bucket systems traditionally used by the grain industry to carry hot catalyst from the bottom to top of vessels and between vessels. 

Hence, the problem is reduced to whether g(co) has its maximum on the wings or not. Any model able to demonstrate that such a maximum exists for some reason can explain the Poley absorption as well. An example was given recently [77] in the frame of a modified impact theory, which considers instantaneous collisions as a non-Poissonian random process [76]. Under definite conditions discussed at the end of Chapter 1 the negative loop in Kj(t) behaviour at long times is obtained, which is reflected by a maximum in its spectrum. Insofar as this maximum appears in g(co), it is exhibited in IR and FIR spectra as well. Other reasons for their appearance are not excluded. Complex formation, changing hindered rotation of diatomic species to libration, is one of the most reasonable. 

The transparent chamber technique in its broadest sense covers all transparent devices which allow living tissue to be studied microscopically for more than a few hours. A large assortment of devices exist for numerous animals and various tissues (Baker and Nastuk, 1986). Internal organs that have been exteriorized by chamber techniques include a loop of small intestine with its attached mesentery in the rabbit and dog, the pancreas of the mouse, and the ovary and Fallopian tube in the rabbit. Body surfaces that have been replaced by transparent windows include the rabbit and monkey cranium, atrium, and stomach wall, and the dog and rabbit thorax. The original transparent chamber designed for the rabbit ear has since been modified and adapted to the lateral body-wall skin flap of rabbits, the ear of the dog, the hamster cheek pouch, the dorsal skin fold of the mouse and the rat, and even to the upper-arm skin fold in man. 

All of these changes in the Ontario water safety control structure over time led to the modified control structure shown in figure C.7. Dotted lines represent communication, control or feedback channels that still existed but had become ineffective. One thing to notice in comparing the original structure at the top and the one at the bottom is the disappearance of many of the feedback loops. 

Fernandez et al. [5] applied the HW model, to explain the observed existence of an immiscibility gap, with hmited success. As a consequence of this Horst and Wolf [26,27] later modified their model to include important temperature dependencies of the rheological parameters. This lead to some complex predictions, most notably the possibihty of closed loop miscibihty gaps, as can be seen in Fig. 3. At certain shear rates, an LCST blend which is miscible at low temperatures, become immiscible far below the quiescent phase boundary as heated, but then become miscible again at a temperature still below quiescent phase boundary, finally becoming immiscible at some temperature above the quiescent phase boundary, which is in qualitative agreement with the findings of reference [5]. 

---