Computational fluid dynamics modeling

The effects deriving from both nonideal mixing and the presence of multiphase systems are considered, in order to develop an adequate mathematical modeling. Computational fluid dynamics models and zone models are briefly discussed and compared to simpler approaches, based on physical models made out of a few ideal reactors conveniently connected. 

Detailed process characterization for reduction of stress exposure, insurance of homogenized reaction conditions, and identification of suitable scale-up parameters (e.g., with the help of chemometric modeling, computational fluid dynamics)... 

If similarity theory is applied correctly, the dimensionless numbers and characteristics that are determined are independent of the scale. This makes it possible, by using appropriate scale-up rules, to specify the operating parameters for industrial-scale systems from the results of tests carried out on models. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) can be used to visualize the impeller system at its full scale, thus contributing to solving scale-up problems. 

The simplest case of fluid modeling is the technique known as computational fluid dynamics. These calculations model the fluid as a continuum that has various properties of viscosity, Reynolds number, and so on. The flow of that fluid is then modeled by using numerical techniques, such as a finite element calculation, to determine the properties of the system as predicted by the Navier-Stokes equation. These techniques are generally the realm of the engineering community and will not be discussed further here. 

Computer Models, The actual residence time for waste destmction can be quite different from the superficial value calculated by dividing the chamber volume by the volumetric flow rate. The large activation energies for chemical reaction, and the sensitivity of reaction rates to oxidant concentration, mean that the presence of cold spots or oxidant deficient zones render such subvolumes ineffective. Poor flow patterns, ie, dead zones and bypassing, can also contribute to loss of effective volume. The tools of computational fluid dynamics (qv) are useful in assessing the extent to which the actual profiles of velocity, temperature, and oxidant concentration deviate from the ideal (40). 

The Prandtl mixing length concept is useful for shear flows parallel to walls, but is inadequate for more general three-dimensional flows. A more complicated semiempirical model commonly used in numerical computations, and found in most commercial software for computational fluid dynamics (CFD see the following subsection), is the A — model described by Launder and Spaulding (Lectures in Mathematical Models of Turbulence, Academic, London, 1972). In this model the eddy viscosity is assumed proportional to the ratio /cVe. 

Another detailed method of determining pressures is computational fluid dynamics (CFD), which uses a numerical solution of simplified equations of motion over a dense grid of points around the building. Murakami et al. and Zhoy and Stathopoulos found less agreement with computational fluid dynamics methods using the k-e turbulence model typically used in current commercial codes. More advanced turbulence models such as large eddy simulation were more successful but much more costly. ... 

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is becoming more popular, as discussed above for building pressures. However, a recent paper found difficulties in the practical use of current commercial codes due to the wide range of user inputs and decisions. - Other papers are exploring alternatives to the standard k- e model typically used in commercial codes today. -" ... 

In theory it should be possible to calculate the capture efficiency without measurements. Some attempts have used computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models, but difficulty modeling air movement and source characteristics have shown that it will be a long time before it will be possible to calculate the capture efficiency in advance. ... 

Computational fluid dynamics methods may allow for more accurate predictions. These models account for turbulence and other parameters such as thermal effects. A description of these methods is included in Chapter 11. 

Four methods for industrial air technology design are presented in this chapter computational fluid dynamics (CFD), thermal building-dynamics simulation, multizone airflow models, and integrated airflow and thermal modeling. In addition to the basic physics of the problem, the methods, purpose, recommended applications, limitations, cost and effort, and examples are pro vided. 

The highest level of integration would be to establish one large set of equations and to apply one solution process to both thermal and airflow-related variables. Nevertheless, a very sparse matrix must be solved, and one cannot use the reliable and well-proven solvers of the present codes anymore. Therefore, a separate solution process for thermal and airflow parameters respectively remains the most promising approach. This seems to be appropriate also for the coupling of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) with a thermal model. ... 

P. V. Nielsen. Airflow in a world exposition pavilion studied by scale-model experiments and computational fluid dynamics. ASHRAE Transactions, 101(2), 1118-1126, 1995. 

Particle trajectories can be calculated by utilizing the modern CFD (computational fluid dynamics) methods. In these calculations, the flow field is determined with numerical means, and particle motion is modeled by combining a deterministic component with a stochastic component caused by the air turbulence. This technique is probably an effective means for solving particle collection in complicated cleaning systems. Computers and computational techniques are being developed at a fast pace, and one can expect that practical computer programs for solving particle collection in electrostatic precipitators will become available in the future. 

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is the numerical analysis of systems involving transport processes and solution by computer simulation. An early application of CFD (FLUENT) to predict flow within cooling crystallizers was made by Brown and Boysan (1987). Elementary equations that describe the conservation of mass, momentum and energy for fluid flow or heat transfer are solved for a number of sub regions of the flow field (Versteeg and Malalase-kera, 1995). Various commercial concerns provide ready-to-use CFD codes to perform this task and usually offer a choice of solution methods, model equations (for example turbulence models of turbulent flow) and visualization tools, as reviewed by Zauner (1999) below. 

Computational Fluid Dynamics modelling predictions (Al-Rashed etal., 1996) indicate that such velocity gradients can vary considerably throughout a vessel, as illustrated in Figure 8.28. 

W. Shyy, H. S. Udaykumar, M. M. Rao, R. W. Smith. Computational Fluid Dynamics with Moving Boundaries in Series in Computational and Physical Processes in Mechanics and Thermal Sciences. Washington, DC Taylor Francis, 1995 W. Shyy. Computational Modeling for Fluid Flow and Interfacial Transport. Amsterdam Elsevier, 1994. 

So far, some researchers have analyzed particle fluidization behaviors in a RFB, however, they have not well studied yet, since particle fluidization behaviors are very complicated. In this study, fundamental particle fluidization behaviors of Geldart s group B particle in a RFB were numerically analyzed by using a Discrete Element Method (DEM)- Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) coupling model [3]. First of all, visualization of particle fluidization behaviors in a RFB was conducted. Relationship between bed pressure drop and gas velocity was also investigated by the numerical simulation. In addition, fluctuations of bed pressure drop and particle mixing behaviors of radial direction were numerically analyzed. 

In this chapter, a number of transport phenomena with entirely different natures are compared for liquids filling porous systems. Here transport can refer to flow, diffusion, electric current or heat transport. Corresponding NMR measuring techniques will be described. Applications to porous model objects will be juxtaposed to computational fluid dynamics simulations. 

The advantages of this type of system are obvious the pore space is of sufficient complexity to represent any natural or technical pore network. As the model objects are based on computer generated clusters, the pore spaces are well defined so that point-by-point data sets describing the pore space are available. Because these data sets are known, they can be fed directly into finite element or finite volume computational fluid dynamics (CFD) programs in order to simulate transport properties [7]. The percolation model objects are taken as a transport paradigm for any pore network of major complexity. 

If one wants to model a process unit that has significant flow variation, and possibly some concentration distributions as well, one can consider using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to do so. These calculations are very time-consuming, though, so that they are often left until the mechanical design of the unit. The exception would occur when the flow variation and concentration distribution had a significant effect on the output of the unit so that mass and energy balances couldn t be made without it. 

---