Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Model with realistic molecular parameters

So far we have considered only the effect of the atmospheric thermal structure on a single line. However, in the thermal infrared, molecular bands are dominantly responsible for the gaseous opacity, and it is useful to see how they affect the appearance of spectra. We illustrate this with the 667 cm band of carbon dioxide (CO2) and the temperature profile shown in Fig. 4.3.1. This profile qualitatively [Pg.148]

From this example it is clear that some combination of thermal structure and emitting gas abimdance can be inferred from observed spectra. As we have seen, a qualitative picture can often be obtained simply by inspecting a display of the spectral data. A more quantitative assessment requires solutions of the equation of transfer. First, however, it is necessary to examine how instrumental effects modify the appearance of planetary spectra. This will be discussed in the next chapter. [Pg.151]


Although methods based on molecular dynamics seem very promising, and, with increase in computer power, are likely to become more widespread, continuum models will probably remain in use, especially in the calculation of NMR parameters. NMR spectroscopy is inherently slow , that is, the time scale of interaction with incident radiation allows for multiple rearrangement of the solvent structure. This makes continuum models more realistic for NMR than for optical spectroscopies with shorter time scales. [Pg.141]

The initial states of model systems can generally be obtained in two ways (1) by generating ordered structures of uniform polymers and subsequent melting of the ordered systems or (2) by polymerization in bulk, which can be performed according to various polymerization mechanisms leading in this way to systems with realistic nonuniformities of molecular parameters. The first method has mainly been used in published papers [26,27,34,35,37], whereas the second method has been used recently [45],... [Pg.169]

One drawback of the MF1V2 model is the inability of UNIFAC to predict (vapour + liquid) equilibria (VLB) and (liquid + liquid) equilibria (LLE) conditions using the same set of group-interaction parameters. In general, cubic equations of state do not provide precise predictions of the phase equilibria when the mixture is asymmetric in size that is attributed to the large differences in the pure-component co-volumes. The Carnahan -Starling equation for hard spheres is a more realistic model for the repulsive contribution than that proposed by van der Waals. Mansoori et al. proposed an equation for mixtures of hard spheres that has been found to correlate the phase behaviour of non-polar mixtures with large molecular size differences. [Pg.440]

We start with the simplest model of the interface, which consists of a smooth charged hard wall near a ionic solution that is represented by a collection of charged hard spheres, all embedded in a continuum of dielectric constant c. This system is fairly well understood when the density and coupling parameters are low. Then we replace the continuum solvent by a molecular model of the solvent. The simplest of these is the hard sphere with a point dipole[32], which can be treated analytically in some simple cases. More elaborate models of the solvent introduce complications in the numerical discussions. A recently proposed model of ionic solutions uses a solvent model with tetrahedrally coordinated sticky sites. This model is still analytically solvable. More realistic models of the solvent, typically water, can be studied by computer simulations, which however is very difficult for charged interfaces. The full quantum mechanical treatment of the metal surface does not seem feasible at present. The jellium model is a simple alternative for the discussion of the thermodynamic and also kinetic properties of the smooth interface [33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40]. [Pg.139]

Furthermore, the molecular scheme for the gel point prediction and viscoelasticity calculation in the course of the network formation were described in Section 3 and 4, respectively. Although some simpler models are in demand, the frameworks currently used are too complicated to use conventionally. However, the effect of unequal reactivity on the delay of gel point could be derived by drawing the detailed molecular scheme. Conversely, it is necessary to set the model up to details to meet with the realistic experimental data. Such molecular parameters allows us to prepare materials near the gel point with a wide range of properties for applications, like adhesives, absorbents, vibration dampers, sealants, membranes etc. With suitable design, it will be possible to control network structures, relaxation character, and then mechanical properties to the requirements. [Pg.56]

This equation is based on the assumption that the gas phase may be treated as ideal gas and the volume of the liquid is negligible compared to that of the vapor. Eg-l represents the difference in the total energies of the gas (Eg) and the liquid (El) phase. The estimate of Eg is based on the MD non-periodic simulation of one M(CH3) molecule in vacuum and the value of El is extracted from the MD simulation of the molecular liquid in periodic boundary conditions. The enthalpy of vaporization results obtained with the two parameter sets derived with different quantum mechanical methods (PBE and MP2) together with the experimentally assessed value are presented in Table 26.7. The two theoretical estimates are essentially identical. Comparison between theory and experiment is acceptable but needs improvement. More satisfying results would provide probably simulations of more realistic systems, e.g. the gas phase may be modeled more sophisticatedly. [Pg.477]

In computational chemistry it can be very useful to have a generic model that you can apply to any situation. Even if less accurate, such a computational tool is very useful for comparing results between molecules and certainly lowers the level of pain in using a model from one that almost always fails. The MM+ force field is meant to apply to general organic chemistry more than the other force fields of HyperChem, which really focus on proteins and nucleic acids. HyperChem includes a default scheme such that when MM+ fails to find a force constant (more generally, force field parameter), HyperChem substitutes a default value. This occurs universally with the periodic table so all conceivable molecules will allow computations. Whether or not the results of such a calculation are realistic can only be determined by close examination of the default parameters and the particular molecular situation. ... [Pg.205]

A useful model should account for a reduction of kt and kp with increase in polymer molecular weight and concentration and decrease in solvent concentration at polymerization temperatures both below and above the Tg of the polymer produced. For a mechanistic model this would involve many complex steps and a large number of adjustable parameters. It appears that the only realistic solution is to develop a semi-empirical model. In this context the free-volume theory appears to be a good starting point. [Pg.49]

The lattice gas has been used as a model for a variety of physical and chemical systems. Its application to simple mixtures is routinely treated in textbooks on statistical mechanics, so it is natural to use it as a starting point for the modeling of liquid-liquid interfaces. In the simplest case the system contains two kinds of solvent particles that occupy positions on a lattice, and with an appropriate choice of the interaction parameters it separates into two phases. This simple version is mainly of didactical value [1], since molecular dynamics allows the study of much more realistic models of the interface between two pure liquids [2,3]. However, even with the fastest computers available today, molecular dynamics is limited to comparatively small ensembles, too small to contain more than a few ions, so that the space-charge regions cannot be included. In contrast, Monte Carlo simulations for the lattice gas can be performed with 10 to 10 particles, so that modeling of the space charge poses no problem. In addition, analytical methods such as the quasichemical approximation allow the treatment of infinite ensembles. [Pg.165]

With respect to SCF models that focus on the tail properties only (typically densely packed layers of end-grafted chains), the molecularly realistic SCF model exemplified in this review needs many interaction parameters. These parameters are necessary to obtain colloid-chemically stable free-floating bilayers. A historical note of interest is that it was only after the first SCF results [92] showed that it was not necessary to graft the lipid tails to a plane, that MD simulations with head-and-tail properties were performed. In the early MD simulations (i.e. before 1983) the chains were grafted (by a spring) to a plane it was believed that without the grafting constraints the molecules would diffuse away and the membrane would disintegrate. Of course, the MD simulations that include the full head-and-tails problem feature many more interactions than the early ones. [Pg.62]

Extension to many dimensions provides insight into more sophisticated aspects of the method and into the nature of molecular interactions. In the second stage of this unit, the students perform molecular dynamics simulations of 3-D van der Waals clusters of 125 atoms (or molecules). The interactions between atoms are modeled using the Lennard-Jones potentials with tabulated parameters. Only pairwise interactions are included in the force field. This potential is physically realistic and permits straightforward programming in the Mathcad environment. The entire program is approximately 50 lines of code, with about half simply setting the initial parameters. Thus the method of calculation is transparent to the student. [Pg.228]


See other pages where Model with realistic molecular parameters is mentioned: [Pg.148]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.1192]    [Pg.1237]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.574]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.501]    [Pg.574]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.1316]    [Pg.802]    [Pg.501]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.2832]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.617]    [Pg.637]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.30]   


SEARCH



Model parameter

Molecular parameters

Realistic

Realists

© 2024 chempedia.info