Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Microscopy techniques compare

Hermann R and Muiier M 1991 High resoiution bioiogicai scanning eiectron microscopy a comparative study of iow temperature metai coating techniques J. Eiectron. Microsc. Tech. 18 440-9... [Pg.1651]

The relatively poor spatial resolution of XPS compared, for example, with electron microscopy techniques such as SAM is more than offset by the benefit of concurrent chemical state identification. [Pg.31]

As reported earlier, several types of microscopy techniques can be used for the observation of food microstructure. They allow the generation of data in the form of images (Kalab et al., 1995). Because of the artifacts due to the preparation of samples before microscopy analysis, it is advisable to apply a variety of techniques to the same samples in order to compare the... [Pg.210]

The oldest microscopy technique for materials analysis was optical microscopy. Even to this day, for feature sizes above 1 pm, this is one of the most popular tools. For smaller features, electron microscopy techniques such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) are the tools of choice. A third family of microscopy includes scanning probe tools such as scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). In these relatively recent techniques, sample preparation concerns are of minor importance compared to other problems, such as vibration isolation and processing of atomically sharp probes. Therefore, the latter techniques are not discussed here. This chapter is aimed at introducing the user to general specimen preparation steps involved in optical and electron microscopy [3 7], which to date are the most common... [Pg.378]

AFM (atomic force microscopy). The major advantages of these techniques, compared with UHV surface science techniques, are that they do not require vacuum conditions, which usually entail a lot of experimental difficulties, and the removal of electrodes... [Pg.4]

The ammonium salt of Rh(III) Anderson type heteropolymolybdate [RhMo6024H6] has been prepared and characterized by powder X-ray diffraction, spectroscopic [FTIR-Raman, DRS (UV-visible)] and SEM-EDAX electron microscopy techniques. The water soluble salts were used in the design and preparation of Y-AI2O3 supported catalysts. The varied Mo Rh ratio of both olution and solid samples was measured by AAS technique. The supported oxidic system was characterized by DRS spectroscopy and SEM-EDAX microscopy. The HDS and HYD activity for different bimetallic catalysts was measured in a high-pressure reactor. In addition, some conventional catalysts and some C0M06 and combined supported systems [(RhMoe + AIM06)] have been tested for comparative purposes. The discussion about the performance of the new catalysts is made on the basis of the structural and physicochemical heteropolyanion properties as well as the preparation conditions. [Pg.565]

Acoustic waves are often used in microscopy techniques for failure analysis and reliability testing of modem devices. Although they have a quite large wavelength up to several centimeters, they can be well used for nanoscopic investigations by introduction of near-field conditions [1], e.g. with microprobes. These microprobes can be used either as an acoustic source [2,3] or as a detector [4,5] together with a comparably large acoustic transducer. [Pg.180]

This chapter opens with a description of the packing of polymer molecules in crystals. X-ray diffi-action gives an extremely precise description of this, since the polymer lattice diffracts X-rays as does any other three-dimensional lattice. The shape and mutual arrangement of the minute crystals are then described. The crystals are separated one from another amorphous regions whose dimensions are comparable with those of the crystals. The information on these matters stems from electron and light microscopy, techniques which are less precise than X-ray diffiractiotL Crystalline synthetic polymers are invariably partly ciystalUne and partly amorphous the term crystalline polymer always implies partially crystalline. [Pg.45]

Sigillo et al. (1997) used several experimental methods for the measurement of interfacial tension of a model polymer blend. Common to all methods presented here are two main points. The first is that a is obtained from experiments where the shape of the interface between the liquids is directly observed by means of optical microscopy techniques. The second point is that the interface geometry is controlled by a balance between the interfacial force and the viscous stresses generated by some flow applied to the system. Measurements have been carried out on a model polymer blend, whose constituents are a polyisobutylene and a polydimethylsiloxane, both transparent and liquid at room temperature. When compared with each other, the values of interfacial tension obtained from the different methods show a good quantitative agreement. Excellent agreement is also found with results for the same system previously published in the literature. [Pg.482]

Visualization of serial sections is the most frequently used computer technique in confocal microscopy, independent of specific applications [83], [108]. [109], Most commercial instruments have three-dimensional software implementations ready for the user. Three-dimensional objects are displayed on the computer screen by staking up the individual sections. Such techniques have been reviewed in several articles [110]-[114]. Besides surface rendering based on contours, volumetric representations that rely on the intensities of the voxels are the preferred techniques in confocal microscopy. A comparative assessment of both techniques is given in [115]. Reconstructions are presented three-dimensionally on a computer graphics screen by using either visual cues, animation, of stereoscopic displays. [Pg.1077]

The various general microscopy techniques are listed and compared in Tables 7.6 and 7.7. Table 7.6 compares optical, electron and scanning probe microscope techniques, with the magnification, resolution, field of view and imaging... [Pg.360]


See other pages where Microscopy techniques compare is mentioned: [Pg.111]    [Pg.677]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.423]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.508]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.1142]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.535]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.469]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.6268]    [Pg.221]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.480 , Pg.481 , Pg.482 , Pg.483 , Pg.484 , Pg.485 , Pg.486 , Pg.487 ]




SEARCH



Microscopy techniques

© 2024 chempedia.info