Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Micromeritic measurements

The term micromeritics (coined by Godfrey Schmidt by combining piKpoo small and pepoa part, used for the first time by Dalla Valle [113]) encompasses a broad field that includes particle size and particle-size distribution. Other aspects of micromeritics that are important to pharmaceutical scientists are particle shape, specific surface area, porosity, and density. A few of these are briefly discussed in the following. [Pg.284]


Micromeritic measurements on the catalysts shown in Table 10.8 are given in Table 10.11. Before their nse, the catalysts— particnlarly those prepared from mixed oxides— had to be carefully reduced in process gas to convert hexavalent chromic oxide to trivalent chromium oxide. [Pg.425]

ITie BET method is the most widely used procedure for determining the surface area of porous materials. In this chapter, BET results were obtained from single point measurements using a Micromeritics Flowsorb II 2300 surface area analyzer. A mixture of nitrogen in helium (30 70 mole percentage) was used. Although this simple method is not quantitative for the microporous materials studied in section 5, it still allows qualitative comparisons to be made. [Pg.350]

The major gaseous components were analyzed by a gas chromatograph equipped with a TCD and a molecular sieve 13X column. The specific surface areas of carbon produced were measured by the BET method(ASAP 2010, Micromeritics). The morphology and particle size of the formed carbon were investigated by the scanning electron microscopy(S-4200, Hitachi... [Pg.421]

Physical properties of the prepared catalysts were measured by an adsorption analyzer [Quantachrome Co., Autosorb-lC]. The structure of prepared catalysts were investigated by XRD [Simmazdu Co., XRD-6000] with a Cu-Ka radiation source (X = 1.54056 A), voltage of 40.0 kV, ciurent of 30.0 mA and scan speed of 5.0 deg/min. Also, temperature-programmed reduction (TPR) profiles of the samples were investigated by a sorption analyzer [Micromeritics Co., Autochem II] and obtained by heating the samples from room temperature to 1100°C at a rate of lOTl/min in a 5 % H2/Ar gas flow (50 ml/min). [Pg.614]

The reference Pt-Ba/y-Al203 (1/20/100 w/w) catalyst shows surface area values in the range 140-160 m2/g, a pore volume of 0.7-0.8cc/g and an average pore radius close to 100 A (measured by N2 adsorption-desorption at 77 K by using a Micromeritics TriStar 3000 instrument). Slight differences in the characterization data are associated to various batches of the ternary catalyst [24,25],... [Pg.178]

Some properties of the rock used in this study were measured The cation exchange capacity (cec) was determined by the barium sulfate method as described by Mortland and Mellor (33). Surface area was measured by using a Digisorb Meter (Micromeritics Instrument Corporation) through nitrogen adsorption. Estimation of mineral composition and indentification of the rock were performed by X-ray diffraction. [Pg.597]

Grinding was performed using Retsch ball-mill. Particle size distribution was measured using Malvern (Mastersizer) laser particle sizer. BET surface area measurements were carried out using ASAP (Micromeritics) surface area analyzer. [Pg.208]

Specific surface area (SSA), total pore volume and average pore diameter were measured by N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms at 77K using Micromeritics ASAP 2020. The pore size was calculated on the adsorption branch of the isotherms using Barrett-Joyner-Helenda (BJH) method and the SSA was calculated using the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method. [Pg.13]

N2-BET analysis and porosity measurements were done on a Micrometries ASAP 2000 apparatus at liquid nitrogen temperature. Temperature-programmed desorption of ammonia (NH3-TPD) and temperature-programmed reduction by H2 (H2-TPR) were performed with a Micromeritics AutoChem 2910 apparatus. [Pg.130]

Physical adsorption of nitrogen was carried out on an ASAP 2400 Micromeritics apparatus. Before measurements, samples were evacuated overnight at 350 °C at vacuum of 2 Pa. For all samples the same adsorption data table was used. Collected adsorption data were treated by BET-isotherm in the range 0.05 < P/micropore volume and mesopore + external surface, t-plot method, with master isotherm of nonporous alumina (Harkins-Jura) was used, t-plot was linearized in the range of 0.35 < t < 0.6 nm. [Pg.230]

The chemical compositions of the samples were obtained by ICP in a Varian 715-ES ICP-Optical Emission Spectrometer. Powder X-ray diffraction was performed in a Philips X pert diffractometer using monochromatized CuKa. The crystallinity of the zeolites was obtained from the intensity of the most intense reflection at 23° 20 considering the parent HZ5 sample as 100% crystalline. Textural properties were obtained by nitrogen physisorption at -196°C in a Micromeritics ASAP 2000 equipment. Surface areas were calculated by the B.E.T. approach and the micropore volumes were derived from the corresponding /-plots. Prior to the adsorption measurements the samples were degassed at 400°C and vacuum overnight. [Pg.322]

Nitrogen adsorption was performed at -196 °C in a Micromeritics ASAP 2010 volumetric instrument. The samples were outgassed at 80 °C prior to the adsorption measurement until a 3.10 3 Torr static vacuum was reached. The surface area was calculated by the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method. Micropore volume and external surface area were evaluated by the alpha-S method using a standard isotherm measured on Aerosil 200 fumed silica [8]. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of samples dried at 80 °C were collected at room temperature on a Broker AXS D-8 diffractometer with Cu Ka radiation. Thermogravimetric analysis was carried out in air flow with heating rate 10 °C min"1 up to 900 °C in a Netzsch TG 209 C thermal balance. SEM micrographs were recorded on a Hitachi S4500 microscope. [Pg.390]

BET and Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) measurements for the catalysts were conducted to determine the loss of surface area with loading of the metal and changes in pore size distributions. These measurements were conducted using a Micromeritics Tri-Star system. Prior to the measurement, samples were slowly ramped to 160°C and evacuated for 24 h to approximately 50 mTorr. [Pg.151]

The surface area was calculated using the BET equation,36 while the total pore volume and the average pore size were calculated from the nitrogen desorption branch applying the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method.37 BET and BJH adsorption measurements were carried out with a Micromeritics Tri-Star system on both the supports and the calcined catalysts. Prior to measurements, the samples were evacuated at 433 K to approximately 50 mTorr for 4 h. [Pg.248]

BET surface area measurements were carried out using a Micromeritics TriStar 3000 gas adsorption analyzer. Approximately 0.35 g of sample was weighed out and loaded into a 3/8-inch sample tube. Nitrogen was used as the adsorption gas and sample analysis was performed at the boiling temperature of liquid nitrogen. [Pg.370]

When applied to powders, micromeritics is taken to include the fields that relate to the nature of the surfaces making up the solid. Of all the properties that could be measured, the surface area, its porosity, and the density of a material are generally considered to be the most pharmaceutically relevant... [Pg.19]

Measurements of particle porosity are a valuable supplement to studies of specific surface area, and such data are particularly useful in the evaluation of materials used in direct compression processes. For example, both micromeritic properties were measured for several different types of cellulosic-type excipients [53]. Surface areas by the B.E.T. method were used to evaluate all types of pore structures, while the method of mercury intrusion porosimetry used could not detect pores smaller than 10 nm. The data permitted a ready differentiation between the intraparticle pore structure of microcrystalline and agglomerated cellulose powders. [Pg.21]

This chapter on micromeritics will deal specifically with surface area, porosimetry, and density measurements. It is designed to introduce the importance of the specific technique in pharmaceutics and briefly describe the theory, instrumentation, and data collection involved. Examples are presented to... [Pg.254]

Micromeritics) or Autosorb-1 (Quantachrome) allow measurements of AIs starting from P/P0 10 7, and comparative plots in this range discover new opportunities for more detailed studies of micropore structure and surface heterogeneity evaluation [84-87],... [Pg.279]

Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) data were collected via a Siemens D5005 diffractometer with CuKa radiation (A. = 1.5418 A). Routine transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and Z-contrast microscopy were carried out using an HITACH HD-2000 scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) operated at 200 kV. Nitrogen gas adsorption measurements (Micromeritics Gemini) were used to determine the surface area and porosity of the catalyst supports. Inductively coupled plasma (ICP) analysis was performed via an IRIS Intrepid II XSP spectrometer (Thermo Electron Corporation). [Pg.58]

Characterization. The high resolution TEM images were obtained on a JEOL 2010 electron microscope with an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. Measurement of nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms was performed on a Micromeritics ASAP... [Pg.74]

The catalysts were characterized by measuring the total surface area, BET area, and the pore size distribution by nitrogen adsorption in a Micromeritics ASAP 2010 unit. The zeolite and matrix surface areas were calculated by the t-plot method [16,17], For data see Table 4.2. [Pg.66]

The total acidity of different samples was measured by NHj-TPD with Micromeritics Autochem II (ASAP 2920) chemisorption system. The pyridine FT-IR spectra of the catalysts were recorded on a BIO-RAD FT3000 FT-IR spectrometer after desorption at 250 and 450°C, respectively. Then the total and strong acidity of Eewis and Bronsted acid was obtained from the integrated absorbance of the respective bands. [Pg.78]


See other pages where Micromeritic measurements is mentioned: [Pg.284]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.554]    [Pg.582]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.220]   


SEARCH



Micromeritics

© 2024 chempedia.info